C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
natural chiral feedstock. In addition, they can be easily tuned in
the oxazoline and biaryl phosphite moieties so that their effect on
catalytic performance can be explored. By carefully selecting the
ligand components, we obtained high activities and enantioselectivities
under unoptimized reaction conditions. Of particular note are the
excellent activities and enantioslectivities at low catalyst loadings
obtained with simple disubstitued olefins. So, this is an exceptional
ligand family that competes favorably with a few other ligand series
that also provide high ee values for tri- and disubstituted substrate types.
The introduction of a bulky biaryl phosphite moiety in the ligand design
is highly advantageous in the product outcome. Therefore, these ligands
provides higher enantioselectivities than its phosphinite-oxazoline
analogue. These results provide a new class of ligands for the highly
active and enantioselective Ir-catalyzed hydrogenation of a wide range
of substrates. Mechanistic studies are currently under way and further
applications are being looked into.
Figure 3. Selected hydrogenation results. Reaction conditions: 0.2 mol %
catalyst, CH2Cl2 as solvent, 50 bar H2, 2 h. Reaction run with 1 mol %
catalyst.
a
Acknowledgment. We thank the Spanish (CTQ2007-62288/
BQU) and Catalan (2006BE-210167 and Distinction to M.D.)
Government, COST D40, Vetenskapsrådet (VR), and Astra Zeneca
for support. We are grateful to Pa¨ivi Kaukoranta for assistance with
chiral analyses.
Figure 4. Selected hydrogenation results. Reaction conditions: 0.2 mol%
catalyst, CH2Cl2 as solvent, 1 bar H2, 30 min.
activity is mainly affected by the steric properties of the oxazoline
substitutent and by the substituents at the ortho positions of the
biaryl phosphite moiety. The presence of bulky substitutents in the
biaryl phosphite and less-sterically demanding substituents in the
oxazoline is necessary if activities are to be high. The best result
(100% conversion; >99% ee) was therefore obtained with ligand
L1c (entry 3), which contains the optimal combination of the
substituent in the oxazoline and in the biaryl phosphite moieties.
We also performed the reaction at low catalyst loading (0.2 mol
%) using ligand L1c (entry 10). The excellent enantioselectivity
(>99% (R) ee) and activity (100% conversion after 2 h at room
temperature) were maintained.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization of new ligands L1f and L1g and [Ir(cod)(L)]BArF (L)
L1-L4a-h) complexes. This material is available free of charge via
References
(1) (a) Ojima, I. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: New
York, 2000. (b) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis;
Wiley: New York, 1994. (c) Blaser, H.-U.; Schmidt, E. Asymmetric
Catalysis on Industrial Scale; Wiley: New York, 2004. (d) Brown, J. M.
In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A.,
Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1999; Vol. 1.
(2) For recent reviews, see: (a) Ka¨llstro¨m, K.; Munslow, I.; Andersson, P. G.
Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 3194. (b) Roseblade, S. J.; Pfaltz, A. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2007, 40, 1402. (c) Church, T. L.; Andersson, P. G. Coord. Chem.
ReV. 2008, 252, 513. (d) Cui, X.; Burgess, K. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 3272.
(3) See for instance: (a) Tang, W.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2003, 42, 943. (b) Hou, D.-R.; Reibenspies, J.; Colacot, T. J.; Burgess,
K. Chem.sEur. J. 2001, 7, 5391. (c) Cozzi, P. G.; Menges, F.; Kaiser, S.
Synlett 2003, 833. (d) Lighfoot, A.; Schnider, P.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3897. (e) Menges, F.; Neuburger, M.; Pfaltz, A. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 4713. (f) Liu, D.; Tang, W.; Zhang, X. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
513. (g) Drury III, W. J.; Zimmermann, N.; Keenan, M.; Hayashi, M.;
Kaiser, S.; Goddard, R.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 70.
(h) Cheruku, P.; Gohil, S.; Andersson, P. G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1659.
(4) (a) Perry, M. C.; Cui, X.; Powell, M. T.; Hou, D.-R.; Reibenspies, J. H.;
Burgess, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5391. (b) Blankestein, J.; Pfaltz,
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4445. (c) Kaiser, S.; Smidt, S: P.;
Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5194. (d) Ka¨llstro¨m, K.;
Hedberg, C.; Brandt, P.; Bayer, P.; Andersson, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 14308. (e) Engman, M.; Diesen, J. S.; Paptchikhine, A.;
Andersson, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4536. (f) Trifonova, A.;
Diesen, J. S.; Andersson, P. G. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2318. (g) Menges,
F.; Pflatz, A AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002, 334, 4044.
Interestingly, these phosphite-oxazoline ligands showed higher
enantioselectivities than its corresponding phosphinite-oxazoline
analogue L1h (entry 3 vs 11) .
To study the potential of these readily available ligands further,
we also tested them in the asymmetric hydrogenation of several
trisubstituted unfunctionalized olefins S2-S4 (Figure 3). The
enantioselectivities are among the best observed for these substrates.2,9
It should be noted that if ligands are appropriately tuned, high
enantioselecitvities can also be obtained for the more demanding
Z isomer S4, which usually reacts with a lower enantioselectivity
than that of the corresponding E-isomer S3. Ir-L1c also proved to
be an excellent catalyst for the hydrogenation of R,ꢀ-unsaturated
ester S5, allylic alcohol S6, and acetate S7 (Figure 3).
Encouraged by the excellent results, we also tested the Ir-L1c
catalyst in the asymmetric hydrogenation of more demanding
substrates: the terminal olefins S8-S10 (Figure 4). For these
substrates, the development of highly enantioselective Ir-catalysts
is still a challenge. Therefore few catalytic systems have provided
high enantioselectivities.10 The enantiomeric excesses obtained for
this substrate class surpass the best values reported to date. Note
also the high activities obtained at low catalyst loadings (0.2 mol
%) under mild reaction conditions (1 bar of H2). Interestingly, Ir-
L1c is also capable of hydrogenating substrate S10, which contains
(5) For some representative examples see: (a) Claver, C.; Die´guez, M.; Pa`mies,
O.; Castillo´n, S. Catalytic Carbonylation Reactions; Beller, M.; Ed.;
Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2006; pp 35-64. (b) Die´guez, M.; Pa`mies, O.;
Ruiz, A.; Claver, C. In Methodologies in Asymmetric Catalysis; Malhotra,
S. V.; Ed.; ACS: Washington, DC, 2004; pp 161-174. (c) Yan, M.; Zhou,
Z.-Y.; Chan, A. S. C. Chem. Commun. 2000, 115. (d) Pa`mies, O.; Die´guez,
M.; Claver, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3646. (e) Mata, Y.; Pa`mies,
O.; Die´guez, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13, 3296.
(6) See for instance: (a) Reetz, M. T.; Neugebauer, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1999, 38, 179. (b) Die´guez, M.; Ruiz, A.; Claver, C. Chem. Commun. 2001,
2702.
(7) Hilgraf, R.; Pfaltz, A. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 61.
(8) Ligands L1-L4a-e have been successfully used in Pd-catalyzed allylic
substitution and Heck reactions, see: (a)(a) Mata, Y.; Die´guez, M.; Pa`mies,
O.; Claver, C. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 1943. (b) Reference 5e.
(9) The best enantioselectivities obtained so far are: >99% ee for S3 (ref 4c),
98% ee for S4(ref 4c), 99% ee for S5 (ref 3g), 98% ee for S6 (ref 4d) and
99% ee for S7 (ref 4d) at 1 mol % Ir-catalyst.
(10) For successful applications, see: (a) McIntyre, S.; Ho¨rmann, E.; Menges,
F.; Smidt, S. P; Pfaltz, A. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 282. (ee values up
to 94% for S9). (b) Reference 4d (ee values up to 97% for S9).
t
an sterically hindered Bu group, in high activities and enantiose-
lectivities.
In summary, we have described the first successful application
of phosphite containing ligands in the Ir-catalyzed asymmetric
hydrogenation of several unfunctionalized olefins. The advantage
of these phosphite-oxazoline ligands is that they are easily prepared
in a few steps from commercial D-glucosamine, an inexpensive
JA801706S
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 23, 2008 7209