Boovanahalli et al.
TABLE 2. Con ver sion of 2-Meth oxyn a p h th a len e to
2-Na p h th ol in Va r iou s Ion ic Liqu id s a n d Solven tsa
be attributed to the catalytic influence of bromide ion
concentration on the rate of ether cleavage, and it
suggests that a minimum of ca. 2 equiv of hydrobromic
acid is required for achieving an optimal conversion rate.
[bmim][X] or
solvent
protic acid
(equiv)
[bmim][Br] time yield
entry
(equiv)
(h)
(%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
[bmim][PF6]
HBr (47%) (2)
12
16
12
22
48
48
48
48
20
16
22
22
90
92
95
37
37
34
19
35
90
93
93
-
Use of other protic acids such as p-TsOH, MsOH,
hydrochloric acid, and sulfuric acid alone resulted in poor
conversion (30, 27, 25, and 29%, entries 5, 8, 12, and 14,
respectively); moreover, the reaction using acetic acid did
not proceeded at all (entry 10). We presume that these
differences are due to the lower nucleophilicity of the
counterions of these acids relative to hydrobromic acid.
However, the efficiency of p-TsOH, MsOH, concentrated
hydrochloric acid (35%), and dilute sulfuric acid (50%)
in cleaving the methyl ether was significantly increased
when these were employed together with the ionic liquid
[bmim][Br] as a source of additional nucleophile.
[bmim][NTf2] HBr (47%) (2)
[bmim][OTf] HBr (47%) (2)
[bmim][OAc] HBr (47%) (2)
ClCH2CH2Cl HBr (47%) (2)
benzene
CH3CN
H2O
HBr (47%) (2)
HBr (47%) (2)
HBr (47%) (2)
p-TsOH (3)
[bmim][PF6]
3
3
3
3
10
11
12
[bmim][NTf2] p-TsOH (3)
[bmim][OTf] p-TsOH (3)
[bmim][OAc] p-TsOH (3)
a
All reactions were carried out on a 1.0 mmol reaction scale of
2-methoxynaphthalene 1 in 1.0 mL of ionic liquid or solvent at
115 °C. Isolated yield.
b
The reaction using the combination of p-TsOH as
proton donor on a 2 mmol scale in conjunction with
[bmim][Br] on a 2 mmol scale as a nucleophile source
was complete in 22 h, furnishing the desired product
2-naphthol 2 in very good yield (97%, entry 6). Conse-
quently, the duration of reaction could be reduced further
by employing p-TsOH and [bmim][Br], each on a 3 mmol
scale, complete conversion being achieved within 14 h
(97%, entry 7). As expected, similar results were obtained
using the combination of ionic liquid [bmim][Br] along
with protic acids, MsOH, concentrated hydrochloric acid
(35%) and dilute sulfuric acid (50%), each on a 3 mmol
ratio, giving the desired product in 14, 22, and 22 h,
respectively, in good yields (97, 93, and 93%, entries 9,
13, and 15, respectively). However, under the same
conditions, the reaction using acetic acid and water as a
proton source along with [bmim][Br] as nucleophile did
not proceed at all, even after 22 h (entries 11 and 16).
Accordingly, it was found that [bmim][Br] alone also is
not sufficiently effective for dealkylation of the ether,
with no detectable transformation being noted when the
reaction was performed with this reagent alone in [bmim]-
[BF4], despite heating for 22 h (entry 4).
and solvents such as 1,2-dichloroethane, benzene, aceto-
nitrile (Table 2).
A comparison of entries 3 and 4 in Table 2 demon-
strates that demethylation in the ionic liquid [bmim][OTf]
not only proceeded remarkably faster but also provided
2-naphthol 2 in higher yield (95%) (12 h, entry 3). In
contrast to this, the same reaction in [bmim][OAc]
converted only 37% of 2-methoxynaphthalene 1 to 2-naph-
thol 2 in 22 h (entry 4). It is noteworthy that both the
ionic liquids [bmim][PF6] and [bmim][NTf2] were also
found to be equally good for this conversion, affording
the desired product 2-naphthol 2 in good yield (90 and
92% in 12 and 16 h, entries 1 and 2, respectively).
Interestingly, by employing ionic liquids [bmim][PF6],
[bmim][NTf2], and [bmim][OTf] as reaction media in the
presence of [bmim][Br] and p-TsOH, the expected prod-
uct, 2-naphthol 2, was also obtained in good yield (90,
93, and 93%, respectively; 20, 16, and 22 h, entries 9-11,
respectively), whereas the same reaction in [bmim][OAc]
did not proceed at all, even after 22 h (entry 12). All four
solvents, 1,2-dichloroethane, benzene, acetonitrile, and
water, afforded the desired compound in low yield,
despite having the reaction heated for 48 h (entries 5-8,
yields of 37, 34, 19, and 35%, respectively), indicating that
the specific ionic liquid used plays a pivotal role in
providing the enhanced nucleophilicity of HBr in this
displacement reaction, and that certain solvents can
moderate the effectiveness of the ether cleavage reagent.
From these results, it is evident that both an efficient
nucleophile as well as an effective proton source are
required to achieve a smooth transformation of ether to
phenol, with the reaction failing when either of the two
components is omitted. Notably, hydrobromic acid ex-
hibits dual character, being a proton donor as well as an
effective nucleophile in the ionic liquid.
The initial reaction is obviously formation of the
protonated ether. Cleavage then involves nucleophilic
attack by the halide ion on the alkyl carbon adjacent to
this protonated ether. In the cases where p-TsOH donates
a proton, the ionic liquid [bmim][Br] acts as a halide
nucleophile source, with the resulting ionic liquid stabi-
lized as [bmim]+[OTs]-.
These results reveal that the ionic liquids [bmim][PF6],
[bmim][NTf2], and [bmim][OTf] enhance the reactivity of
HBr, as does the combination of [bmim][Br] and p-TsOH,
resulting in the facile demethylation of 2-methoxynaph-
thalene 1. Thus, considerable selectivity in ether cleavage
can also be achieved by using [bmim][PF6], [bmim][NTf2],
and [bmim][OTf] as a solvent medium. On the other
hand, a significant decline in yield or no reaction is noted
when using [bmim][OAc], indicating that this ionic liquid
diminishes not only the activity of HBr but also the
combination of [bmim][Br] and p-TsOH, thereby giving
poor conversion.
To enlarge the scope of both of these dealkylation
methods, we have subjected a series of aryl methyl ethers,
as well as aryl benzyl and propyl ethers, to the same
conditions as done for entries 2 and 7 in Table 1; the
results are shown in Table 3. Interestingly, entries 1 and
As with organic solvents, all ionic liquids will not be
suitable for a particular reaction, and any one ionic liquid
will not always be best for every reaction. However, by
varying the structure of the ionic liquid, one can optimize
both the rates and the selectivity for each reaction. As a
further study of the reactions shown in entry 2 and 7 in
Table 1 and to establish the generality of reaction media,
we have performed demethylation of 2-methoxynaphtha-
lene 1 employing various other ionic liquids such as
[bmim][PF6], [bmim][NTf2], [bmim][OTf], [bmim][OAc],
3342 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 10, 2004