Z. Yang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 17 (2009) 1071–1078
1077
peaks in each scan were analyzed by MS/MS. Dynamic
exclusion was set at a repeat count of 2 with exclusion
duration of 2 min. Database searches were performed
using the mouse NCBI protein database using the Se-
quest algorithm (Thermo Fisher, USA). Peptides with
XCorr values over 1.5 (+1 charge), 2 (+2 charge) and
2.5 (+3 charge) and deltaCn values over 0.1 were consid-
ered for further evaluation. Protein and peptide hits
were statistically reevaluated by Scaffold (Proteome
Software, USA). Peptide identifications were accepted
if they could be established at greater than 95% proba-
bility as specified by the Peptide Prophet algorithm. Pro-
tein identifications were accepted if they could be
established at greater than 99.0% probability and con-
tained at least two identified peptides. Protein probabil-
ities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm.23
plate one day before treatment. Cells were pre-treated
with yzm09 (10 lM), or with control DMSO (0.1%)
for 1 h and labeled for 1 h by addition of yzm24 to
culture medium. The final DMSO concentration was
maintained at 0.2%. Cells were washed with PBS
twice and lysed by addition of sample buffer (10%
glycerol, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6.8, 3% SDS, and
5% b-mercaptoethanol). Lysates were boiled for
10 min and cleared by centrifugation. Equal amounts
of protein per lane were separated by 15% SDS–
PAGE, and labeled proteases were visualized by scan-
ning of the gel with a Typhoon flatbed laser scanner
(Ex/Em 532/580 nm).
Acknowledgments
4.7. Determination of kinetic rate constants of inhibition
This work was supported by the National Institutes of
Health National Technology Center for Networks and
Pathways Grant U54 RR020843, R01 EB005011, P01
CA072006, and a Stanford Chemical and Systems Biol-
ogy training grant (to S.V.).
The kinetics of inhibition was determined by the pro-
gress curve method under pseudo-first-order conditions
with at least 10-fold molar excess of inhibitor. Recorded
progress curves were analyzed by nonlinear regression
according to the following equation:
½Pꢂ ¼ mzð1 ꢀ eꢀktÞ=k
References and notes
where [P] is the product, vz is the velocity at time zero
and k is the pseudo-first-order rate constant. Apparent
rate constant (kapp) was determined from the slope of
plot k versus [I]. Because of the irreversible and compet-
itive mechanism of inhibition, kapp was converted to the
association constant (kass) using the equation below:
1. Campbell, D. A.; Szardenings, A. K. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2003, 7, 296.
2. Jeffery, D. A.; Bogyo, M. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14,
87.
3. Kozarich, J. W. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 78.
4. Speers, A. E.; Cravatt, B. F. Chembiochem 2004, 5, 41.
5. Verhelst, S. H. L.; Bogyo, M. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2005, 24,
261.
6. Evans, M. J.; Cravatt, B. F. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3279.
7. Powers, J. C.; Asgian, J. L.; Ekici, O. D.; James, K. E.
Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4639.
8. Cravatt, B. F.; Sorensen, E. J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2000, 4, 663.
9. Yuan, F.; Verhelst, S. H. L.; Blum, G.; Coussens, L. M.;
Bogyo, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5616.
10. Palmer, J. T.; Rasnick, D.; Klaus, J. L.; Bromme, D. J.
Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 3193.
11. Wang, G.; Yao, S. Q. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4437.
12. Borodovsky, A.; Ovaa, H.; Meester, W. J. N.; Venanzi,
E. S.; Bogyo, M. S.; Hekking, B. G.; Ploegh, H. L.;
Kessler, B. M.; Overkleeft, H. S. Chembiochem 2005, 6,
287.
13. Hemelaar, J.; Borodovsky, A.; Kessler, B. M.; Reverter,
D.; Cook, J.; Kolli, N.; Gan-Erdene, T.; Wilkinson, K. D.;
Gill, G.; Lima, C. D.; Ploegh, H. L.; Ovaa, H. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 2004, 24, 84.
kass ¼ kappð1 þ ½Sꢂ=KmÞ
Activity of human cathepsin L was measured with the
fluorogenic substrate Z-FR-AMC (Bachem; Km =
7.1 lM) and cathepsin B was assayed against the fluoro-
genic substrate Z-RR-AMC (Bachem; Km = 114 lM).
Concentration of substrates during the measurement
was 10 lM. Cathepsins B and L (1 nM final concentra-
tions) were incubated with inhibitor concentrations rang-
ing from 10 to 2000 nM in the presence of 10 lM of
appropriate substrate. Total volume during the measure-
ment was 100 lL. The increase in fluorescence (370-nm
Ex, 460-nm Em) was continuously monitored for
30 min with a Spectramax M5 fluorescent plate reader
(Molecular Devices), and inhibition curves were re-
corded. DMSO concentration during all measurements
was 3.5%.
14. Overkleeft, H. S.; Bos, P. R.; Hekking, B. G.; Gordon, E.
J.; Ploegh, H. L.; Kessler, B. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 6005.
15. Bogyo, M.; Shin, S.; McMaster, J. S.; Ploegh, H. L. Chem.
Biol. 1998, 5, 307.
16. Nazif, T.; Bogyo, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001,
98, 2967.
17. Santos, M. M. M.; Moreira, R. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem.
2007, 7, 1040.
4.8. Cell cultures
WT mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF), Cat Lꢀ/ꢀ MEF
cells, and Cat Bꢀ/ꢀ MEF cells were cultured in DMEM
supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U mlꢀ1 penicillin,
100 lg mlꢀ1 streptomycin. All cells were cultured in a
humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 ꢁC.
18. Choe, Y.; Brinen, L. S.; Price, M. S.; Engel, J. C.; Lange,
M.; Grisostomi, C.; Weston, S. G.; Pallai, P. V.; Cheng,
H.; Hardy, L. W.; Hartsough, D. S.; McMakin, M.;
Tilton, R. F.; Baldino, C. M.; Craik, C. S. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2005, 13, 2141.
4.9. Labeling of intact cells with probes
WT and Cat Lꢀ/ꢀ (240,000 cells per well) and Cat
Bꢀ/ꢀ (300,000 cells per well) were seeded in a six-well