8204
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8204-8214
Mechanistic Studies of Olefin Metathesis by Ruthenium Carbene
Complexes Using Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Christian Adlhart, Christian Hinderling, Harold Baumann, and Peter Chen*
Contribution from the Laboratorium f u¨ r Organische Chemie der Eidgen o¨ ssischen
Technischen Hochschule, Z u¨ rich, Switzerland
ReceiVed October 27, 1999
Abstract: The olefin metathesis reaction of the Grubbs ruthenium carbene complexes has been investigated in
the gas phase by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Relative rates of reaction for substituted
ruthenium benzylidenes and alkylidenes after removal of one phosphine ligand were interpreted with the aid
of linear free energy analysis and kinetic isotope effects. The experimental observations are consistent with a
reaction profile in which the metallacyclobutane structure is a transition state rather than an intermediate,
although alternative explanations cannot be wholly ruled out. Electron withdrawal on the carbene moiety is
found to accelerate the metathesis reaction when only the metathesis step itself is examined. Quantum chemical
calculations at a variety of levels were performed to check for the consistency of the interpretation.
Introduction
has elucidated many aspects of the catalytic cycle for this class
of metathesis catalyst. With cationized phosphine ligands,12
ruthenium benzylidene complex was even rendered soluble and
a
Olefin metathesis is one of the very few, or arguably even
the only, fundamentally novel organic transformations discov-
ered in the past four decades. Following the initial report of
homogeneously catalyzed metathesis of propylene in 1967, the
basic mechanistic picture of the reaction was worked out with
1
3
1
active in water, methanol, or aqueous emulsions. Despite the
wide application of the metathesis reaction, particularly for the
new ruthenium carbene complexes, several mechanistic ques-
tions remain outstanding. What determines the selectivity in the
reaction? What is the rate-determining step? Is the metalla-
cyclobutane an intermediate or transition state? In an earlier
contributions from the groups of Calderon, Katz, Casey, Grubbs,
Schrock, and others.2 The Chauvin mechanism3 via metal
carbene complexes has been amply supported by experiment
and is now accepted as an accurate depiction of the general
course of the reaction. The unique transformation has found
1
4
report, we used electrospray ionization tandem mass spec-
trometry (ESI-MS/MS) to investigate the cationized ruthenium
carbene complexes in the gas phase.
considerable application in the Shell higher olefin process
4
We report here further mechanistic studies on the (Cy2RP)-
Cl2RudCHAr complex, including isotopic labeling, kinetic
isotope effects, and the influence of electron-donating or
-withdrawing substituents on the rates of 2 f 3 and 2 f 4
(SHOP) for the large-scale production of long-chain R-olefins
and ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP), com-
mercialized by B. F. Goodrich (Telene) and Hercules (Metton)
5
for reaction-injection molding (RIM), and CDF-Chimie (Nor-
(Scheme 1), which suggest that the metallacyclobutane structure
sorex) and Degussa-H u¨ ls (Vestenemer) for specialty resins. The
metathesis reaction has furthermore been applied in organic
is a transition state rather than an intermediate in the metathesis
reaction, at least for the ruthenium carbene complexes. Further
6
synthesis; for example, several recent syntheses of a variety
of natural and nonnatural products use a ring-closing metathesis
to accomplish difficult macrocyclizations. The recent introduc-
(
7) Miller, S. J.; Kim, S. H.; Chen, Z. R.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem.
7
Soc. 1995, 117, 2108. Miller, S. J.; Blackwell, H. E.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9606. F u¨ rstner, A.; Langemann, K. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 3942. F u¨ rstner, A.; Langemann, K. Synthesis 1997, 792. Nicolaou,
K. C.; He, Y.; Vourloumis, D.; Vallberg, H.; Yang, Z. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2399. Yang, Z.; He, Y.; Vourloumis, D.; Vallberg, H.;
Nicolaou, K. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 166. Xu, Z.;
Johannes, C. W.; Houri, A. F.; La, D. S.; Cogan, D. A.; Hofilena, G. E.;
Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10302. Kamat, V. P.;
Hagiwara, H.; Suzuki, T.; Ando, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998,
2253.
(8) Nguyen, S. T.; Johnson, L. K.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3974.
(9) Demonceau A.; Noels, A. F.; Saive, E.; Hubert, A. J. J. Mol. Catal.
1992, 76, 123.
tion of well-defined late transition metal metathesis catalysts,
particularly ruthenium complexes,8,9 has significantly broadened
the scope of the reaction due to their substantial tolerance of
heteroatom-containing functional groups which had poisoned
1
0,11
earlier catalysts. Mechanistic work from the Grubbs group
(
1) Calderon, N.; Chen, H. Y.; Scott, K. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967,
327.
2) For several representative reviews spanning the three decades of
3
(
work, see: Katz, T. J. AdV. Organomet. Chem. 1978, 16, 283. Calderon,
N.; Lawrence, J. P.; Ofstead, E. A. AdV. Organomet. Chem. 1979, 17, 449.
Grubbs, R. H.; Tumas, W. Science 1989, 243, 907.
(
3) Herrison, J. L.; Chauvin, Y. Makromol. Chem. 1970, 141, 161.
(10) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 100. Ulman, M.; Grubbs, R. H. Organometallics 1998, 17, 2484.
(11) Dias, E. L.; Nguyen, S. T.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 3887.
(12) Mohr, B.; Lynn, D. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Organometallics 1996, 15,
4317.
(4) Commercial aspects of olefin metathesis are reviewed in the
following: Ivin, K. J.; Mol, J. C. Olefin Metathesis and Metathesis
Polymerization; Academic Press: New York, 1997; pp 397-410.
(5) Goodall, B. L.; Kroenke, W. J.; Minchak, R. J.; Rhodes, L. F. J.
Appl. Polym. Sci. 1993, 47, 607. McCann, M.; McDonnell, D.; Goodall, B.
L. J. Mol. Catal. A 1995, 96, 31. Rhodes, L. F. European Patent 0 435 146
A2, 1990. Mazany, A. M. European Patent 0 755 938 A1, 1995.
(13) Lynn, D. M.; Mohr, B.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 1627.
(
46.
6) Grubbs, R. H.; Miller, S. J.; Fu, G. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28,
(14) Hinderling, C.; Adlhart, C.; Chen, P. Angew. Chem. 1998, 110,
2831.
4
1
0.1021/ja9938231 CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/10/2000