U.R. Pratap et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 68 (2011) 94–97
95
2. Experimental
2.1. General
Melting points were determined by open capillary method and
are uncorrected. Progress of the reaction was monitored by thin
layer chromatography on MERKs silica plates. 1H and 13C NMR
spectra were recorded on Bruker DRX-300 (300 MHz FT NMR) using
TMS as internal standard. Mass spectral data were determined by
JEOL AccuTOF DART mass spectrometer. Baker’s yeast was obtained
from local market. All chemicals used were reagent grade and used
without further purification.
Scheme 1.
Initially when the reaction was run in water at room tempera-
and the intermediate disulfide (4) (Table 1, entry 1) was formed
even after prolonged stirring (40 h). When the model reaction was
performed in the solvent like dichloromethane, the starting materi-
was observed after 20 h of stirring (Table 1, entry 3). Inspired by this,
we next investigated the effect of methanol on the yield and time of
these results we decided to carry the model reaction by using ultra-
sonic irradiation, as ultrasonication is one of the most widely used
the fast release of enzymes [23].
Ultrasound assisted (US) reaction of 2-aminobenzenethiol and
acetyl acetone in ethanol, carried at room temperature gave 68%
yield of the product within 6 h (Table 1, entry 5). Same reaction
when carried in methanol the reaction time has been decreased
by 3 h and the yield was found to be increased to 82% (Table 1,
entry 6). In view of these observations we have selected methanol
benzothiazines.
Subsequently the other substituted 2-aminobenzenethiols and
1,3-dicarbonyl compounds were subjected under the optimized
reaction conditions to obtain the respective 1,4-benzothiazines.
The results are recorded in Table 2 (Scheme 2). From these results it
seems that the baker’s yeast accepts broad array of substrate combi-
nations. One of the substrates 1,3-diphenyl 1,3-propanedione failed
to react with 2-aminobenzenethiol. This indicates that baker’s
yeast does not accept the substrate 1,3-diphenyl 1,3-propanedione
(Table 2, entry 10). The chemical reactivity of 1,3-diphenyl 1,3-
dicarbonyls has been well explored in presence of other catalysts
and obtained respective 1,4-benzothiazines. However, under the
optimized reaction conditions 1,3-diphenyl 1,3-dicarbonyl did not
undergo cyclocondensation.
2.2. General experimental procedure
To the stirred solution of 2-aminobenzenethiol (10 mmol) in
methanol (25 mL), active dry baker’s yeast (2 g) and -dicarbonyl
(10 mmol) were added. Then the reaction mixture was sonicated at
20 kHz for 3 h at 25–30 ◦C. The progress of the reaction was mon-
itored by thin layer chromatography by using ethyl acetate: pet
ether (2:8) as eluent. After completion of the reaction the reaction
mass was filtered through the bed of celite (1 g). From the filtrate,
the solvent methanol was removed under reduced pressure and the
crude products isolated were crystallized from hot ethanol (Table 2,
entries 1–10).
2.2.1. 1-(3-Methyl-4H-benzo[b][1,4]thiazine-2-yl)ethanone (3a)
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 2.33 (s, 3H), 2.42 (3H, s, CH3), 5.91
(s, 1H, NH), 6.98–8.21 (m, 4H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 190.68, 153.41, 139.36, 127.44,
126.36, 124.99, 120.49, 115.43, 98.15, 30.24, 21.41.
ESI DARTMS: calculated for C11H11NOS + 1: 206.0561; found:
206 0611.
2.2.2. 1-(3,7-Dimethyl-4H-benzo[b][1,4]thiazin-2-yl)ethanone
(3d)
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 1.96 (s, 3H), 2.20 (s, 3H), 2.45 (s,
3H), 5.91 (s, 1H, NH), 7.01 (t, 1H, J = 4.0 and 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.37 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 22.49, 28.96, 29.92, 110.12,
114.61, 127.33, 129.37, 133.49, 135.13, 136.17, 153.54 and 194.13.
ESI DARTMS: calculated for C12H13NOS + 1: 220.0717; found:
220.1154.
2.2.3. Ethyl
3,7-dimethyl-4H-benzo[b][1,4]thiazine-2-carboxylate (3e)
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 1.19 (t, 3H), 2.08 (s, 3H), 2.38 (s,
3H), 4.13 (q, 3H), 6.15 (S, 1H, NH), 7.15 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (t, 1H,
J = 4.0 and 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H).
ESI DARTMS: calculated for C13H15NO2S + 1: 250.0823; found:
250.0796.
To investigate the role of baker’s yeast in cyclocondensation the
model reaction was run in absence of baker’s yeast, no formation
Table 1
Effect of solvent on the reaction of 2-aminobenzenethiol and acetyl acetone.a
Entry
Solvent
Reaction
Time (h)
Yield (%)b
conditions
3. Results and discussion
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
Water
Dichloromethane
Ethanol
Methanol
Ethanol
Methanol
Methanol
Methanol
rt
rt
rt
rt
US
US
US
US
<40
<40
20
10
6
90c
–
Here, we describe very simple and one pot protocol for the
synthesis of 1,4-benzothiazines. This involves the oxidative cyclo-
condensation with 2-aminobenzenethiols with 1,3-dicarbonyl
compounds, expedited by baker’s yeast as a whole cell biocatalyst
at ambient temperature.
Our investigations started with an optimization study of model
reaction by allowing cyclocondensation of 2-aminobenzenethiol
(1a) and acetyl acetone (2a) in presence of baker’s yeast (Scheme 1).
To see the effect of reaction medium on the rate and yield of the
reaction we carried model reaction in various solvents like water,
dichloromethane, ethanol and methanol under stirring at room
temperature (rt).
61
78
68
82
n.d.
n.d.
3
4 days
10
n.d. = not detected.
a
Reaction conditions: 2-aminobenzenethiol (8 mmol), acetyl acetone (8 mmol),
baker’s yeast (2 g) in 25 mL solvent.
b
Isolated yields.
c
Formation of disulfide (4). Formation of disulfide was confirmed by the com-
parison of the M.P. and spectral studies with disulfide prepared by earlier method
[27].