acids,5 ionic liquids6) and physical methods (high pres-
sure,7 ultrasounds,8 microwave irradiations9) have been
described in recent years.
Ferrocenylphosphines as New Catalysts for
Baylis-Hillman Reactions
With the aim of developing more active Lewis base
catalysts for Baylis-Hillman reaction, phosphines,10
especially the highly nucleophilic trialkylphosphines,11
constitute a very interesting alternative to the more basic
tertiary amines. However, unlike tertiary amines, tri-
alkylphosphines must be used under careful experimen-
tal conditions due to their high sensitivity to air oxidation
and in some cases pyrophoric character.12 Having in mind
the idea of developing a phosphine catalyst enjoying
simultaneously stability to air oxidation and high nu-
cleophilicity, we envisaged that due to the electron-rich
character of the ferrocene moiety, ferrocenyldialkylphos-
phines could be interesting catalysts in Baylis-Hillman
reaction. Additionally, planar chiral ferrocenylphos-
phines, which have provided countless examples of excel-
lent enantiocontrol in catalytic asymmetric metal-
catalyzed reactions,13 could offer a new alternative in
asymmetric Baylis-Hillman reaction.
Susana Isabel Pereira,† Javier Adrio,†
Artur M. S. Silva,‡ and Juan Carlos Carretero*,†
Departamento de Quı´mica Orga´nica, Universidad
Auto´noma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain,
and Departamento de Quı´mica, Universidade de Aveiro,
Campus de Santiago, 3810-183 Aveiro, Portugal
Received August 11, 2005
On the basis of these considerations, the ferroce-
nylphosphines 1a-c were readily prepared according to
literature procedures by reaction of ferrocenyllithium
with the corresponding chlorophosphine.14 Table 1 sum-
marizes the results obtained in the model reaction
between benzylacrylate and p-nitrobenzaldehyde (in THF
at rt) in the presence of 15 mol % of the phosphine
catalyst (ferrocenylphosphines 1a-c and the commer-
cially available PPh3 and PCy3).15 For comparison pur-
poses, all reactions were stopped after 1 h of reaction.
To our delight, we observed that the diphenylphosphi-
noferrocene 1a (entry 1) was not only much more reactive
than PPh3 (entry 4), but even more reactive than the
aliphatic trialkylphosphine PCy3 (entry 5, 24% conver-
sion). Interestingly, in agreement with the increase in
nucleophilicity with the alkyl substitution, ferrocenyl-
dialkylphosphines 1b and 1c proved to be more effective.
Readily available ferrocenyldialkylphosphines are effective
air-stable catalysts for Baylis-Hillman reaction between
aldehydes and acrylates, affording the corresponding ad-
ducts in high yields and short reaction times. A set of readily
accessible planar chiral ferrocenyldialkylphosphines have
been tested in asymmetric Baylis-Hillman reactions. The
best enantioselectivities were obtained using Mandyphos as
chiral catalyst (up to 65% ee).
The development of catalytic carbon-carbon bond-
forming reactions leading to highly functionalized build-
ing blocks from simple starting materials is a fundamen-
tal challenge in organic chemistry. The Baylis-Hillman
reaction,1 which allows the direct preparation of R-me-
thylene-â-hydroxycarbonyl products from Michael accep-
tors and aldehydes, is a clear example of this kind of
outstanding process. This reaction is promoted by Lewis
bases, among which nucleophilic nonhindered tertiary
amines, such as diaza[2.2.2]bicyclooctane (DABCO), have
been the most widely used. Nevertheless, the great
synthetic potential of the Baylis-Hillman reaction is
often hampered by low reaction rates (reactions lasting
a week or more are common) and chemical yields highly
sensitive to the substitution at both aldehyde and Michel
acceptor partners. In attempts to overcome these limita-
tions, a wide variety of chemical (more activated carbonyl
compounds,2 hydrogen bonds donors,3 metal salts,4 Lewis
(5) (a) Aggarwal, V. K.; Mereu, A.; Tarver, G. J.; McCague, R. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7183. (b) Pei, W.; Wei, H.-X.; Li, G. Chem.
Commun. 2002, 1856. (c) Yang, K.; Lee, W.; Pan, J.; Chen, K. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 915. (d) You, J.; Xu, J.; Verkade, J. G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5054.
(6) (a) Rosa, J. N.; Afonso, C. A. M.; Santos, A. G. Tetrahedron 2001,
57, 4189. (b) Aggarwal, V. K.; Emme, I.; Mereu, A. Chem. Commun.
2002, 1612. (c) Pe´got, B.; Vo-Thanh, G.; Gori, D.; Loupy, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 6425.
(7) Hayashi, Y.; Okado, K.; Ashimine, I.; Shoji, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 8683.
(8) Coelho, F.; Almeida, P. A.; Veronese, D.; Mateus, C. R.; Silva
Lopes, E. C.; Rossi, R. C.; Silveira, G. P. C.; Pavam, C. H. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 7437.
(9) Kundu, M. K.; Mukherjee, S. B.; Balu, N.; Padmakumar, R.;
Bhat, S. V. Synlett. 1994, 444.
† Universidad Auto´noma de Madrid.
(10) (a) Rauhut, M. M.; Currier, H. U. S. Patent, 1963, 3074999;
Chem. Abstr. 1963, 58, 11224a. (b) Rafel, S.; Leahy, J. W. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 1521 and references therein.
‡ Universidade de Aveiro.
(1) For recent reviews, see: (a) Methot, J. L.; Roush, W. R. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1035. (b) Basavaiah, D.; Rao, A. J.; Satya-
narayana, T. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 811. (c) Drewes, S. E.; Roos, G. H.
P. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 4653. (d) Ciganek, E. In Organic Reactions;
Paquette, L. A., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1997; Vol. 51, p 201.
(2) Fort, Y.; Berthe, M. C.; Caubere, P. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 6371.
(3) (a) Cai, J.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, G.; Tang, C. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4723.
(b) Auge, J.; Lubin, N.; Lubineau, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 7947.
(c) Basavaiah, D.; Sarma, P. K. S. Synth. Commun. 1990, 20, 5019.
(4) Kawamura, K.; Kobayashi, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1539-
1542.
(11) (a) Henderson, W. A.; Buckler, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960,
82, 5794. (b) Person, R. G.; Sobel, H.; Songtad, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1968, 90, 319. (c) Rahman, M. M.; Liu, H.-Y.; Eriks, K.; Prock, A.;
Giering, W. P. Organometallics 1989, 8, 3.
(12) Netherton, R. M.; Fu, G. C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4295.
(13) Colacot, T. J. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3101.
(14) (a) Ahrendt, K. A.; Bergman R. G.; Ellman J. A. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 1301. (b) Guillaneux, D.; Kagan, H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2502.
(15) The use of other solvents such as CH3CN, DMF, MeOH, or
mixtures of dioxane/H2O, MeOH/H2O afforded lower yields.
10.1021/jo051701n CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/08/2005
J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10175-10177
10175