Table 2 Solvent effects in allylic etherification of phenola
The authors wish to thank the European Union COST Pro-
gramme D24/0005/02 for support.
Conversion
(%)b
Selectivity
(2/3)b
Solvent
e.e.(%)c
Notes and references
† After stirring 0.015 mmol (3 mol%) of [Cp*Ru(CH3CN)3]PF6 and 0.015
mol (3 mol%) of bisoxazoline ligand in acetone at room temperature for one
hour, 0.75 mmol of potassium carbonate and 0.5 mmol of cinnamyl chloride
were added and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C. After 15 min., 0.75 mmol
of phenol was added and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 40 hours, then
Acetone
Acetonitrile
THF
CH2Cl2
Acetone/CH2Cl2
THF/CH2Cl2
70
88
88
70
96
90
2/1
77
63
80
53
70
75
2.2/1
2.5/1
6.5/1
4/1
1
4/1
filtered on silica and concentrated. The resulting oil was analyzed by H
NMR spectroscopy and the enantiomeric excess was determined by
HPLC.
a conditions : 0.75 mmol of phenol, 0.75 mmol of K2CO3, 0.5 mmol of
cinnamyl chloride, 0.015 mmol of [Cp*Ru(CH3CN)3][PF6] and 5 (3 mol%)
1
in 4 mL of solvent, 0 °C, 40 h. b Determined by H NMR spectroscopy.
1 B. M. Trost and M. L. Crawley, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 2921.
2 (a) B. M. Trost and C. Lee, in Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, I. Ojima,
Ed., Wiley, 2000, pp. 593–649; (b) A. Pfaltz and M. Lautens in
Comprehensive. Asymmetric Catalysis, E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz, H.
Yamamoto, Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 1999, p. 833.
3 (a) C. Goux, P. Lhoste and D. Sinou, Synlett, 1992, 725; (b) S. Cacchi,
G. Fabrizi and L. Moro, Synlett, 1998, 741; (c) B. Nay, J.-F. Peyrat and
J. Vercauteren, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1999, 2231; (d) M. Massacret, P.
Lhoste, R. Lakhmiri, T. Parella and D. Sinou, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1999,
2665.
4 C. Goux, M. Massacret, P. Lhoste and D. Sinou, Organometallics, 1995,
14, 4585.
5 (a) P. A. Evans and D. K. Leahy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 5012;
(b) P. A. Evans and D. K. Leahy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
7882.
6 B. M. Trost, P. L. Fraisse and Z. T. Ball, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002,
41, 1059.
7 (a) A. Iourtchenko and D. Sinou, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 1997, 122, 91;
(b) J.-R. Labrosse, C. Poncet, P. Lhoste and D. Sinou, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 1069.
8 (a) B. M. Trost and F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 11262and
references cited therein (b) B. M. Trost, H. C. Shen, L. Dong and J.-P.
Surivet, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9276.
c Determined by HPLC.
tolerated the presence of methoxy and chloro substituents at the
phenyl ring. Moreover, changing the electronic properties of the
substituted phenol has little influence on the enantioselectivity. On
the other hand, cinnamyl carbonate was found to be much less
reactive than 1.
Table 3 Allylic etherification of substituted phenolsa
Conversion
(%)b
Selectivity
(2/3)b
ArOH
e.e.(%)c,d
4-MeO–C6H4
4-Cl–C6H4
4-H–C6H4
75
96
70
2.2/1
1.6/1
2/1
81 (R)
82 (R)
77 (R)
a Conditions : 0.75 mmol of ArOH, 0.75 mmol of K2CO3, 0.5 mmol of
cinnamyl chloride 1, 0.015 mmol of [Cp*Ru(CH3CN)3][PF6] and 5 (3
mol%) in 4 mL of acetone, 0 °C, 40 h. b as determined by 1H NMR
spectroscopy. c Determined by HPLC. d Absolute configuration of the
products were established by correlation with previous data.9
9 F. Lopez, T. Ohmura and J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
3426.
In conclusion, we developed the first enantioselective allylic
etherification with phenols catalyzed by a system based on the
association of a (pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium pre-
cursor and a chiral bisoxazoline. This catalytic system favoured the
formation of branched allyl aryl ethers starting from cinnamyl
chloride and provided good enantioselectivities with highly
substituted chiral bisoxazoline ligands. The scope of the method
when starting from other types of nucleophiles and other allylic
substrates, as well as the elucidation of the structure of the
ruthenium catalyst are now under investigation.
10 T. Kondo, H. Ono, N. Satabe, T. Mitsudo and Y. Watanabe,
Organometallics, 1995, 14, 1945.
11 Y. Matsushima, K. Onitsuka, T. Kondo, T. Mitsudo and S. Takahashi,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 10405.
12 J.-L. Renaud, C. Bruneau and B. Demerseman, Synlett, 2003, 408.
13 M. D. MBaye, B. Demerseman, J.-L. Renaud, L. Toupet and C.
Bruneau, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 5066.
14 M. D. MBaye, B. Demerseman, J.-L. Renaud, L. Toupet and C.
Bruneau, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2004, 346, in press.
15 A. K. Ghosh, P. Mathivanan and J. Cappiello, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
1998, 9, 1.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 8 7 0 – 1 8 7 1
1871