J. Mazarío et al. / Journal of Catalysis 385 (2020) 160–175
171
point of glycerol (290 °C) made impossible to properly work with it
in gas phase in our FTIR system. In addition, the HT-4 (Mg/Al = 4),
acid sites takes place on Ni and Co catalysts. Moreover, using CO as
a probe molecule, Cu species have been evidenced in the IR stud-
1
+
5
.0%Ni-HT-4 and 5.0%Co-HT-4 samples displaying much lower cat-
ies after 1,2-propanediol adsorption at 160 °C on the 5.0%Cu-HT-4
sample (IR band at 2098 cm )[56], which may be related to Cu
ꢁ1
2+
alytic activity have also been analyzed. 1,2-propanodiol has been
adsorbed at 25 °C on all samples until saturation coverage, and
then the temperature has been stepwise increased from 25 °C to
reduction by the aforementioned Cu-hydride interaction (Fig. 13).
1
+
2+/1+
In opposite, no reduced species Ni nor Co
have been observed
1
60 °C, acquiring IR spectra at each temperature.
Gas phase 1,2 propanediol shows a complex set of IR bands in
in the 5.0%Ni-HT-4 and 5.0%Co-HT-4 samples under similar condi-
tions. This fact was fully expected considering the very low
2+
the low frequency region with maxima at 1654, 1137, 1079,
reducibility of these samples, as very low amounts of Ni and
ꢁ1
3+
1
043, 989, 924 and 839 cm . After adsorption at 25 °C, the IR
bands corresponding to the CAO vibration (1137, 1079 and
043 cm ) are shifted to higher frequencies (1143, 1085 and
Co are available to be reduced at low temperatures (see TPR, Fig-
m
ure S13 in SI). Thus, it can be concluded that weak acid centers are
important because they are 1,2-propanediol adsorption centers
ꢁ1
1
1
ꢁ1
058 cm ) on all samples, in addition to a corresponding shift
3
(see NH -TPD, Figure S10 in SI), and that the additional presence
ꢁ1
2+
2+
3+
in the OH band of all samples (3730 cm ) to lower frequency
of reducible centers, such as Cu (but not Ni and Co ), could
ꢁ
(Fig. 11). Since the interaction of 1,2 propanediol is relatively
favor the abstraction of H , thereby accelerating the carbonyl
ꢁ6
strong in all cases (i.e. stable toward evacuation at 10
mbar
group formation pathway.
2
+
1+
and 25 °C) the red shift of the
an interaction with Lewis acid sites, besides that with OH groups.
In addition, the shift in the CAO IR bands is the same in all sam-
ples, indicating similar adsorption sites in all samples. This fits
with what has been already pointed out about the weak acid sites
mCAO IR bands may correspond to
Once Cu and Cu are identified as the two main species pre-
sent in the catalyst when the reaction is going on, and to assess if
2
+
1+
m
Cu or Cu are involved in the possible intermediate formation
step, the 5.0%Cu-HT-4 sample has been ‘‘ex situ” reduced in H flow
2
1
+
(containing mainly Cu , see XPS data of 5.0%Cu-HT-4R in Fig. 7)
and analyzed in the IR study. As seen in the Cu-based non-
3
+
corresponding to Al as the main responsible of the catalytic activ-
ity. Since these acid sites are present in all the studied materials
ꢁ1
reduced sample, a band at 1705 cm due to the presence of car-
bonyl group has been observed in the 1,2-propanediol temperature
dependent reaction profile. Nevertheless, the onset of carbonyl
group formation appears at a slightly lower temperature, i.e.
120 °C, in the ‘‘ex situ” reduced sample versus 160 °C in the calcined
(
3
see NH -TPD measurements, Figure S10 in SI), they could be the
main responsible of the reactant adsorption.
Despite of this, by analyzing the evolution of the adsorbed 1,2-
propanediol compound at increasing temperatures, a different
behavior could be observed depending on the nature of the transi-
tion metal site (Cu, Ni, and Co), envisaging different reaction mech-
anisms and, accordingly, reaction intermediate species and
reaction rates. Thus, in the 5.0%Cu-HT-4 sample increasing reaction
temperature up to 160 °C leads to the appearance of a band at
2
+
1+
sample (see Figure S14 in SI). Thus, while both Cu and Cu can be
considered as active sites in the 5.0%Cu-HT-4 sample, a slightly
1
+
higher reactivity could be observed for Cu , which agrees on the
improvement already seen when reducing the Cu-containing cata-
lyst with MeOH at 240 °C (see Section 3.5.2). It is important to
remark based on the IR data that the enhanced catalytic activity
in the glycerol dehydration observed with 5.0%Cu-HT-4 sample
can be ascribed to the specific role of copper versus other transition
metals to promote the carbonyl group formation pathway at the
beginning of the process.
ꢁ1
1
705 cm corresponding to a carbonyl functional group, whereas
under the same conditions in the Ni and Co based catalyst a band at
ꢁ1
1
596 cm is observed corresponding to C@C bond, while no addi-
tional band could be observed in the HT-4 sample (Fig. 12). This
may correspond to a different activation mode of the 1,2-
propanediol, where a hydride abstraction could take place pro-
However, despite displaying different reaction mechanisms,
this cannot explain the markedly lower activity of 5.0%Co-HT-4
and 5.0%Ni-HT-4 catalysts. Another aspect which could influence
the catalytic activity is the interaction strength of the reaction
products with the catalyst surface, in a way that a stronger interac-
tion would result in a fast catalyst deactivation. Thus, and in order
to analyze the interaction strength of the reaction products,
hydroxyacetone (or acetol) has been adsorbed on the 5.0%Cu-HT-
ꢁ
moted by Cu species, whereas OH abstraction catalyzed by Lewis
4
and 5.0%Ni-HT-4 samples and followed by FT-IR spectroscopic
measurements. As shown in Fig. 14, hydroxyacetone interacts on
both catalysts, although the interaction is lower on the 5.0%Cu-
HT-4 sample and stronger on the 5.0%Ni-HT-4 sample, probably
because of the higher density of acid sites in this sample (see
3
NH -TPD, Table S2 in SI).
Summarizing, it can be inferred that weak acid sites are relevant
for adsorption of 1,2-propanediol, and the presence of specific cop-
per sites in the Cu-HT sample could favor hydride abstraction in
1
+
the first step of reaction. Moreover, Cu species show a higher
2
+
2+
reactivity compared to Cu , and since Cu species are reduced
in the first state of the reaction due to the presence of methanol,
1
+
we can assess and confirm Cu as active sites in the glycerol dehy-
dration reaction over 5.0%Cu-HT-4 catalyst. Moreover, the desorp-
tion of reaction products is enhanced in the 5.0%Cu-HT-4 sample
compared to the 5.0%Ni-HT-4 and 5.0%Co-HT-4 materials. This
could be related to the different distribution of acid-base sites in
Fig. 11. IR spectra of 1,2-propanediol adsorbed at 25 °C on 5.0%Cu-HT-4 (blue), 5.0%
3
both Co- and Ni-based samples (see NH -TPD measurements,
Ni-HT-4 (red), 5.0%Co-HT-4 (green), HT-4 (cyan) and 5.0%Cu-HT-4R (ex situ H
2
Table S10 in SI) that could have too acid density, thus making prob-
lematic acetol to leave the catalytic surface. Thus, the essential role
of copper species together with the higher interaction of the prod-
reduced, black). In magenta gas phase IR spectra of 1,2-propanediol as reference
spectra. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the
reader is referred to the web version of this article.)