A R T I C L E S
Esqueda et al.
Scheme 1a
a (i) HBTU, DMF, (ii) TFA, DCM.
correlation times, metal bound water exchange ratessin re-
sponse to a specific stimulus (e.g., enzyme,13 protein,14 pH,15
metal,16 etc.). A few Zn2+-specific MRI CAs have been reported
previously. The first was reported by Nagano and co-workers17
who prepared a Gd3+ complex based on the diethylenetriamine-
pentaacetic acid (DTPA) ligand bifunctionalized with N,N-bis-
(2-pyridyl-methyl) ethylene diamine (BPEN), a moiety that has
shown to have a binding specificity for Zn2+ over other metals.
The relaxivity of this complex decreased from 6.1 to 4.0 mM-1
by Nagano forms a 1:2 complex with Zn2+, while the EuDOTA-
bisBPEN-dibutyl tetraamide PARACEST sensor (+3 charge)
only forms a 1:1 complex with Zn2+ 21 These differences must
.
reflect the differences in total charge on each Ln3+ complex.
Given these trends, a decision was made to investigate the Zn2+
binding properties of GdDOTA-bisBPEN diamide (net positive
charge), 3.
Conpound 3 was prepared as outlined in Scheme 1. Com-
pound 1 was first obtained by using a previous published
procedure following protection-derivatization-deprotection
schemes.22 Compound 1 was then coupled with 2 equiv of
BPEN (2) via activation of the free carboxylic acids with HBTU.
After product purification, the tert-butyl groups were removed
producing 3 in a 74% overall yield. The Gd3+ and Eu3+
complexes of 3 were prepared and further purified by HPLC.
s-1 (25 °C, pH 8, 7 T) in the presence of 1 equiv of Zn2+
,
presumably by restricting access of water to the Gd3+ coordina-
tion site. However, the relaxivity of this complex returned to
its initial value when a second Zn2+ was bound, so these features
make this system unattractive for testing in ViVo. The same
authors also reported a modified version of the DTPA derivative
wherein one of the pyridylmethyl groups was replaced by an
acetate moiety. This resulted in a complex that responded to
Zn2+ by changing its relaxivity from 4.8 to 3.5 mM-1 s-1 (25
The relaxivity of GdDOTA-diBPEN increased with addition
of Zn2+. In the absence of Zn2+, the relaxivity of the complex
was 5.0 ( 0.1 mM-1 s-1 (37 °C, pH 7.6, 0.1 M Tris buffer, 23
MHz) and this gradually increased to 6.0 ( 0.1 mM-1 s-1 with
addition of Zn2+ until 2 equiv had been added (Figure 1). This
shows that a 1:2 (Gd:Zn) complex is formed. These r1 values
are similar in magnitude to other GdDOTA-bis-amide complexes
previously reported.23 The relaxivity of GdDOTA-diBPEN
remained constant when dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer
over a period of 24 h, indicating that the agent is stable in a
°C, pH 7.2, 7T) upon addition of 1 equiv of Zn2+ with no further
18
changes upon addition of a second equivalent of Zn2+
.
Although this was an improvement in one sense, both systems
result in an “on-off” response or image darkening upon Zn2+
bindingsclearly not an optimal situation. More recently, Meade
and co-workers19,20 reported an “off-on” Zn2+-responsive agent
derived from GdDO3A. In this agent, the metal water coordina-
tion site is occupied by a carboxylate group of a diaminoacetate
moiety attached through the fourth amino group of the macro-
cycle. When the diaminoacetate binds Zn2+, a water molecule
then coordinates to the Gd3+ which translates in an increase in
relaxivity from 2.3 to 5.1 mM-1 s-1 (37 °C, pH 7.4, 60 MHz),
a much more favorable 120% change. When dissolved in blood
serum, however, the change in relaxivity of this complex
changed much less in response to Zn2+, from 5.8 to 7.7 mM-1
s-1. Nevertheless, an in Vitro study showed that 100 µM Zn2+
could be detected by MRI by this agent in buffer and a Zn2+
binding constant of 240 µM was determined using a fluorescence
competition method. Given that one would like to detect Zn2+
at even lower levels in ViVo, continued development of agents
that respond to Zn2+ in ViVo under physiological conditions is
highly desirable.
(13) Louie, A. Y.; Huber, M. M.; Ahrens, E. T.; Rothbacher, U.; Moats,
R.; Jacobs, R. E.; Fraser, S. E.; Meade, T. J. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000,
18, 321–325.
(14) De Leon-Rodriguez, L. M.; Ortiz, A.; Weiner, A. L.; Zhang, S.;
Kovacs, Z.; Kodadek, T.; Sherry, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
3514–3515.
(15) Zhang, S.; Wu, K.; Sherry, A. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
3192–3194.
(16) Li, W. H.; Fraser, S. E.; Meade, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
1413–1414.
(17) Hanaoka, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Urano, Y.; Nagano, T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 2001, 1840–1843.
(18) Hanaoka, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Urano, Y.; Narazaki, M.; Yokawa, T.;
Sakamoto, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nagano, T. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 1027–
1032.
(19) Major, J. L.; Parigi, G.; Luchinat, C.; Meade, T. J. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 13881–13886.
Results and Discussion
(20) Major, J. L.; Boiteau, R. M.; Meade, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47,
10788–10795.
Gd3+-based MRI contrast agents derived from DOTA-like
macrocyclic ligands have advantages over their linear counter-
parts (DTPA) because of their higher thermodynamic stability
and kinetic inertness. Previous work has shown that the
GdDTPA-bisBPEN diamide agent (zero net charge) developed
(21) Trokowski, R.; Ren, J.; Kalman, F. K.; Sherry, A. D. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6920–6923.
(22) De Leon-Rodriguez, L. M.; Kovacs, Z.; Esqueda-Oliva, A. C.;
Miranda-Olvera, A. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6937–6940.
(23) Zhang, S.; Kovacs, Z.; Burgess, S.; Aime, S.; Terreno, E.; Sherry,
A. D. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 288–296.
9
11388 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 32, 2009