significantly larger in substrates having LL than for substrates
having HL (Scheme 1b).9
Scheme 1
.
CN- Sensing by Nucleophilic or New SET-Based
Reaction and Its STPs
This reaction-based system produces an air-stable radical
anion marker, which is selective and sensitive (0.2-16 µM)
to cyanide. This STP is based on a SOMO-LUMO based
eT, a complete shift from the conventional HOMO-LUMO
eT (Scheme 1b). The formation of spin and charge in the
marker leads to multiple modes of sensing. The indicator
exhibits regenerability and dip-stick sensing. Importantly, the
high conductivity of the radical anion let us fabricate an
electronic device for sensing cyanide.
We synthesized molecular indicators belonging to three
classes: naphthalene-bis-hydrazimide (NBHI)10 (1a-c), NDI
(2a,b), and PDI derivatives (3a) with varying functionalities
X, Y, Z and extent of core conjugation, n, and characterized
by NMR, IR, and mass spectrometry.
Next, to confirm that the Y/Z groups and the linker X can
indeed affect electron-withdrawing (EW) ability of the
carbonyl groups and lower the LUMO levels, we carried out
theoretical calculations and verified the results with IR and
cyclic voltammetry (CV) (Supporting Information, Page No.
S8 and S9). Figure 1 clearly depicts substantial lowering of
These indicators harness high-lying LUMO (HL), and thus,
nucleophilic addition is preferred. They utilize internal
charge-transfer (ICT)-based signal transduction pathway
(STP) involving HOMO-LUMO-based electronic transition
(eT). As a result, signal readability relies on a particular
analytical technique, and instrumentation errors due to limited
signal outputs become inevitable (Scheme 1a). In addition,
some of them require elevated reaction temperature, biphasic
conditions, and lag-time in sensing. This necessitates search
for new indicators having new STPs which can circumvent
the above problems.
In this context, single-electron transfer (SET) based
biological sensors, e.g., redox-active cofactors in bacteria,
1e- oxidation of cyanide, and its complex formation with
cytochrome c oxidase (CcO), etc.,7 motivated us to design
molecules with new STP for anions which are anticipated
to have easy and multiple signal readability.
Figure 1. LUMO levels, IR frequencies, and reduction potentials
for indicators 1a-3a.
the LUMO levels going from 1c f 1a or 2b f 2a (effect
of Y/Z groups) and also nicely discern the pivotal role of
the linker X (NH/CH2) in controlling the electron acceptor
properties in NBHI (1a-c) versus NDI/PDI (2a,b, 3).
The first electron reduction potential (E1) also shows a
significant lowering with substitution of the Y, Z and by
the NH group. IR studies further substantiated that the EW
ability of the carbonyl groups can be enhanced by substitution
effects, e.g., stretching frequency of carbonyl groups in 1a
increases by 18 and 22 cm-1 compared to 2a.
As a proof-of-concept, herein we report the first SET-based
cyanide indicator which is based on a low-LUMO (LL)
design. We chose naphthalenediimide (NDI)8a and perylene-
diimide (PDI)8b moiety as the core unit since (a) the NDI/
PDI moieties have LL levels and provide synthetic scope to
further lower them and (b) they contain carbonyl groups ideal
for electron acceptance. This design aspect is crucial since
for a given anion the electron-transfer component would be
We then explored the colorimetric sensing ability of 1a
and 3a in the presence of anions 1-14. Only in the presence
of cyanide do 1a and 3a with an extended core show an
instantaneous change from colorless to dark brown and from
an initial orange to a turquoise-blue solution, respectively
(Figure 2). The other anions remained nonresponsive. These
color changes are specific to the 1e- transfer to the NDI/
(5) (a) Garc´ıa, F.; Garc´ıa, J. M.; Garc´ıa-Acosta, B.; Mart´ınez-Ma´ñez,
R.; Sanceno´n, F.; Soto, J. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2790–2792. (b) Tomasulo,
M.; Sortino, S.; White, A. J. P.; Raymo, F. M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
744–753. (c) Chung, Y.; Lee, H.; Ahn, K. H. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 9470–
9474. (d) Yang, Y.-K.; Tae, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5721–5723. (e) Lee,
K.-S.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, G.-H.; Shin, I.; Hong, J.-I. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
49–51. (f) Sessler, J. L.; Cho, D.-G. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 73–75. (g) Cho,
D.-G.; Kim, J. H.; Sessler, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12163–
12167.
(6) (a) Hudnall, T. W.; Gabbba¨ı, F. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
11978–11986. (b) Kim, Y.; Zhao, H.; Gabba¨ı, F. P. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 4957–4960.
(9) (a) Hoz, S. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3545–3547. (b) Hoz, S.;
Speizman, D. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2904–2910.
(7) Green, J.; Paget, M. S. Nat. ReV. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 954–966.
(8) (a) Bhosale, S. V.; Jani, C. H.; Langford, S. J. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2008,
37, 331–342. (b) Wu¨rthner, F. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1564–1579.
(10) Compounds 1a and 1b were reported recently; see: Ajayakumar,
M. R.; Mukhopadhyay, P. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3702–3704.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 11, 2010
2647