O.M. Bankole et al. / Polyhedron 88 (2015) 73–80
75
sion. Further purification of the compound was achieved by Soxh-
let extraction using ethanol–water (1:1) for 24 h to remove the
traces of DBU from the compound. Column chromatography on sil-
ica gel as stationary phase and tetrahydrofuran (THF):methanol as
eluent was also performed. The blue-green indium phthalocyanine
obtained was thereafter concentrated and dried.
where I00 is the intensity of the light on focus, b is the two pho-
2
ton absorption (2PA) coefficient, Leff , z and z are the effective path
0
length in the sample of length L, translation distance of the sample
relative to the focus and Rayleigh length, respectively. Rayleigh
2
o
length is defined as
p
w =k, where k is the wavelength of the laser
and w
o
is the beam waist at the focus, (z ¼ 0). Leff is given by Eq. (3):
Yield: 64.6%, UV–Vis (DMSO): kmax/nm (log e): 696 (5.07), 629
ꢁaL
ꢁ
1
1 ꢁ e
(
2
1
H
4
1
4.40), 358 (4.83). FT-IR [KBr disc (
m
max/cm )]: 3285 („C-H);
934 (CH aliphatic); 3089 (Ar-H); 2222 (C„C); 1228, 1118, 1081,
045 (C–O–C), 966, 824, 741, 650 (Pc-Skeleton). Anal. Calc. for C56-
InCl.H O: C, 63.31; H, 4.70; N, 10.52. Found: C, 63.26; H,
.91; N, 10.68%. MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z: Calcd. 1046.36; Found:
L
eff
¼
ð3Þ
a
where
a is the linear absorption coefficient.
48
N
8
O
4
2
The molecular two-photon absorption (MTPA) cross-section
(cm s/photon) can be calculated from the known two-photon
r
2
4
+
1
049.22 [M+3H] . H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d
6
): d, ppm:8.53
absorption coefficient (b Þ using Eq. (4) [36]:
2
(
Ar-H, d, 4H), 7.62 (Ar-H, s, 4H), 7.18 (Ar-H, dd, 4H), 4.09 (CH
2
–
2
2
r2 ¼ 1
000h
N C
A
tb2
ð4Þ
O–, t, 8H), 2.11 (C„CH, s, 4H), 1.75 (CH , m, 8H), 1.48 (CH , m,
8
H), 1.09 (CH
2
, t, 8H).
where, h
t
is the incident photon measured in joules, N
A
is the
2
.3.4. 2,9(10),16(17),23(24)-Tetrakis(prop-2-
Avogadro constant, C is the concentration of the sample.
ð3Þ
ynoxy)phthalocyanatoindium(III) chloride (3b) (Scheme 1)
A mixture of 4-propy-2-ynyloxy-phthalonitrile (2b) (0.3 g,
.64 mmol), indium (III) chloride (0.36 g, 1.64 mmol) and 20 l of
The imaginary third-order susceptibility (I ½
v
ꢂ) is directly
m
proportional to the two-photon absorption coefficient, b as shown
2
1
l
in Eq. (5) [37]:
catalytic DBU in n-pentanol (1.7 mL) was heated to 140 °C under
nitrogen for 20 h. The crude dark product was cooled to room tem-
perature and washed with methanol, ethanol, 1 M HCl and acetone
in succession. Further purification of the compound was achieved
only by Soxhlet extraction using ethanol–water (1:1) for 24 h to
remove the traces of DBU from the compound. The blue-green
indium phthalocyanine obtained was thereafter concentrated and
dried.
I
m
½
vð3Þꢂ ¼ n2
e
0
ckb =2
p
ð5Þ
2
where, n is the linear refractive index, c is the speed of light
respectively, is the permittivity of free space and k is the wave-
length of the laser.
e
0
The relationship between second order hyperpolarizability (
c)
ð3Þ
and third-order susceptibility (I
Eq. (6) [12]:
m
½
v
ꢂ) of the material is given by
Complex 3b yield: (75%). UV–Vis (DMSO): kmax/nm (log
e
): 693
ꢁ1
I ½ ꢂ
vð3Þ
4
(
(
(
5.01), 625 (4.35), 360 (4.75). FT-IR [KBr disc (
m
max/cm )]: 3286
m
c
¼
ð6Þ
„CAH); 2929 (CH aliphatic); 3077 (Ar-H); 2161 (C„C); 1604
Ar C–C), 1280, 1215, 1084, 1011 (C–O–C), 939, 825, 742, (Pc-Skel-
f Cmol
N
A
where Cmol is the molar concentration of the active species in
eton). Anal. Calc. for C44
24 8 4
H N O InCl: C, 60.12; H, 2.75; N, 12.75.
the triplet state, f is the Lorentz local field enhancement factor,
defined as f = (n + 2)/3; n is the refractive index of the sample
and N
Found: C, 60.01; H, 2.74; N, 12.01%. MS (MALDI-TOF) m/z: Calcd.
2
+
1
8
78.86; Found: 879.36 [M+H] . H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d
6
): d,
A
as defined above.
ppm: 8.44 (Ar-H, d, 4H), 7.78 (Ar-H, s, 4H), 7.36 (Ar-H, dd, 4H),
4
.45 (CH
2
–O–, t, 8H), 2.70 (C„CH, s, 4H).
3
. Results and discussion
2.4. Fluorescence and triplet quantum yields
3.1. Synthesis and characterization
Fluorescence (
mined using established methods [31–33] using ZnPc as a standard
in DMSO ( = 0.2 [33] and = 0.65) [32].
Quantum yields of internal conversion (
F T
U ) and triplet (U ) quantum yields were deter-
The novel In-phthalocyanines (3a and 3b) containing terminal
alkyne at the peripheral positions Pcs are reported for the first time
in this work.
U
F
U
T
U
IC) were obtained
from Eq. (1), which assumes that fluorescence, intersystem cross-
ing and internal conversion are the only three processes which
are jointly responsible for the deactivation of the excited singlet
state of both indium (III) phthalocyanine molecules (3a and 3b):
Modification of phthalocyanine molecules to further improve
their architectural flexibility with terminal alkynes is now becom-
ing an active area of research [38–41]. The compounds are readily
soluble in organic solvents such as DMF, DCM, THF, chloroform and
DMSO. The alkyne chain-length of compounds 3a and 3b were
carefully chosen to determine the effect of the chain length on both
the photophysical and non-linear optical properties of the new
phthalocyanines.
U
IC ¼ 1 ꢁ ð
The triplet lifetimes were determined by fitting the data
obtained to single exponential using OriginPro 8 program.
U
F
þ
U
T
Þ
ð1Þ
Targeted alkynyl-phthalonitriles (2a and 2b) were synthesized
via a based-catalyzed nucleophilic aromatic displacement between
2.5. Nonlinear optical parameters
4
-nitrophthalonitrile (1) and propargyl alcohol and 5-hexy-1ol,
The nonlinear optical properties of phthalocyanines are evalu-
Scheme 1. Cyclotetramerization of 2a and 2b (to form 3a and 3b)
ated using the Z-scan technique that has been previously described
34,35]. The technique relies on the total transmittance passing
occurred in the presence of the desired metal salt (InCl ) and a cat-
alytic amount of DBU. Since a large atom like indium requires high
3
[
through the sample as a result of the incident laser pulses. The gen-
eral equation for normalized transmittance (Tnorm(Z)) can be written
as Eq. (2).
energy to insert the metal ion into the phthalocyanine cavity, high-
boiling solvent, n-pentanol, was employed in order to obtain the
desired complexes, 3a and 3b [42]. The compounds were obtained
in satisfactorily high yields and were characterized by elemental
analysis, UV–Vis, FT-IR, H NMR spectroscopies and MALDI-TOF.
The characterization results are consistent with the predicted struc-
tures as shown in the experimental section. The elemental analyses
1
1
T
normðZÞ
¼
ð2Þ
2
1
þ b2Leff ðI00=ð1 þ ðz=z
0
Þ ÞÞ