2
T. Fatima, R.A. Haque and A. Ahmad et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1222 (2020) 128890
complexes were found to be anticancer agents by inhibiting the
cell migration and colony formation of cancer cells [23].
8 × CH of cyclopentyl, m), 4.99 (2H, -CH-, m), 5.23 (8H, 2 × N-
2
CH -CH -N, s), 7.42-8.13 (12H, Ar-H, m), 10.12 (2H, NCHN, s), 10.17
2
2
As we have studied and reported the cytotoxicity of mono-,
di- and tetra-NHC silver(I) complexes against various cancer cell
lines [24–26], thus in keeping the continuation of our studies, the
tri-NHC silver(I) complexes were prepared and evaluated for their
anticancer potential against various cancer cell lines. The present
study aimed to probe whether the tri-NHC metal complexes having
three Ag(I) ions per complex, furnishes greater number of silver(I)
ions with a more sustained release in the cancer cells as compared
to mono-NHC Ag(I) complexes having one, di- and tetra-NHC Ag(I)
complexes having two silver centres per complex. Further in or-
der to get insight into the effect of substituents on the delivery
of the tri-NHC Ag(I) complexes into the cancer cells different sub-
stituents (benzyl/ n-butyl/ cyclopentyl/ 2-methylene benzonitrile/
n-decyl) have been selected.
(1H, NCHN, s).13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ ppm: 22.9, 29.1,
6
31.3, 45.6, 59.6 (CH ); 112.5, 114.1, 127.4, 127.8, 130.6, 131.2 (Ar-C);
2
143.1, 144.5 (NCHN).
2.2.3. 2-Methylenebenzonitrile substituted tris benzimidazolium
bromide (4)
Salt 4 was prepared following the same procedures as described
for salt 2 except that salt II was replaced by IV (0.73 g, 1.62
mmol), benzimidazole (0.12 g, 0.83 mmol). Salt 4 was collected as
white precipitate. Yield: 0.40 g (57%). M.p.: 275-279°C. Anal. Calc.
for C41H35Br3N8: C, 55.97; H, 3.98; N, 12.74. Found: C, 56.31; H,
4.04; N, 12.47. FTIR (KBr) ʋ (cm 1): 3159 (Carom-H), 2968 (Caliph
H), 2228(C≡N), 1616, 1491, 1446 (Carom=Carom), 1568 (Carom-N),
1287 (C
-N). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm: 5.02 (8H,
−
-
aliph
2
× -CH -CH -, s), 5.80 (4H, 2 × CH -Ar, m), 7.46-8.20 (20H, H-Ar,
2
2
2
m), 10.01 (2H, NCHN, s), 10.30 (1H, NCHN, s).13C NMR (125 MHz,
2. Experimental
DMSO-d ) δ ppm: 45.6, 46.2, 49.2 (CH ); 111.7, 112.9, 113.1, 113.8,
6
2
116.5, 127.6, 127.8, 129.4, 129.9, 130.8, 131.2, 133.7, 134.8 (Ar-C);
2
.1. Materials and instruments
143.1, 144.3 (NCHN).
All the chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade and
2
.2.4. n-decyl substituted tris benzimidazolium bromide (5)
were used as received. FTIR spectra were recorded with Perkin
Elmer 2000 spectrometer. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded
Salt 5 was prepared following the same procedures as described
for salt 2 except that salt II was replaced by V (1.04 g, 2.50 mmol),
benzimidazole (0.15 g, 1.21 mmol). Salt 5 was collected as white
precipitate. Yield: 0.60 g (60%). Anal. Calc. for C45H65Br ClN : C,
with Bruker 500 MHz spectrometer. Elemental analysis was per-
formed on Perkin Elmer series II, 2400 microanalyzer. Melting
points were taken using Stuart Scientific SMP-1 (UK) instrument.
3
6
61.05; H, 7.34; N, 9.49. Found: C, 61.38; H, 6.98; N, 9.63. FTIR (KBr)
ʋ (cm 1): 3166, 3109 (Carom-H); 2926, 2855 (Caliph-H), 1614, 1458
−
2
.2. Synthesis
(
Carom=Carom), 1572 (Carom-N), 1271 (Caliph-N). 1H NMR (500 MHz,
DMSO-d ) δppm: 0.85 (6H, 2 × CH , t, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.22-1.25 (28H,
6
3
The precursor salts 3-(2-bromoethyl)-1-(benzyl/ n-butyl/ cy-
1
4 × -CH -, m), 1.77-1.79 (4H, 2 × -CH -, m), 4.44 (4H, 2 × -
2
2
clopentyl/ 2-methylene benzonitrile/ n-decyl) benzimidazolium
bromides (I-V), proligand 1 (Benzyl substituted tris benzimida-
zolium bromide salt) and respective silver(I) complex 6 were pre-
pared according to the reported procedure [27].
CH -N, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.22 (8H, 2 × -CH -CH -, s), 7.46-7.80 (8H,
2
2
2
Ar-H, m), 8.09-8.20 (4H, Ar-H, m), 10.16 (2H, NCHN, s), 10.37 (1H,
NCHN, s). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ ppm: 13.8(CH ); 22.1,
6
3
2
5.6, 28.4, 28.6, 28.7, 28.9, 31.2, 45.5, 46.6 (CH ); 111.2, 113.4, 113.7,
2
Synthesis of tris benzimidazolium bromides (2-5)
1
26.5, 130.7, 131.4(Ar-C); 142.8, 144.2 (NCHN).
Synthesis of tri-NHC trinuclear Ag(I) complexes (7-10)
2
.2.1. n-Butyl substituted tris benzimidazolium bromide (2)
Compound II (1.30 g, 3.60 mmol) and benzimidazole (0.21 g,
2
.2.5. n-Butyl substituted tri NHC-Ag(I) complex (7)
1
.8 mmol) were dissolved in a mixture of 1,4-dioxane (20 mL) and
Salt 2 (0.25 g, 0.35 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (50 mL)
methanol (2 mL). The reaction mixture was heated under reflux
for 32 hours. The tris benzimidazolium bromide salt appeared as
white precipitate, which was filtered and washed with 1,4-dioxane
and dichloromethane sequentially. The product obtained was dried
and silver oxide (0.23 g, 1.00 mmol) was added to it. The reac-
tion mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 days. The re-
action was carried out in a round bottom flask wrapped with alu-
minium foil. After completion of reaction time, the product was
in fume cupboard. Yield: 0.71 g (51%). Anal. Calc. for C33H41Br N :
3
6
separated from the insolubles like AgBr and unreacted Ag O by fil-
2
C, 52.03; H, 5.38; N, 11.03. Found: C, 52.43; H, 5.42; N, 10.80. FTIR
tering through a column of celite. The obtained silver complex is
in bromide form so it was subjected to metathesis using potassium
hexafluorophosphate (0.18 g, 1.00 mmol). The mixture was stirred
for 2 hours and the resulting precipitates were filtered, washed
with distilled water and left to dry at room temperature. The sil-
ver complex 7 was collected as white precipitate. Yield: 0.27 g
(
KBr) ʋ (cm 1): 3166, 3105 (Carom-H), 2967, 2877 (Caliph-H), 1614,
−
1
489, 1469 (Carom=Carom), 1568 (Carom-N), 1282 (Caliph-N). 1H NMR
(
500 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ ppm: 0.92 (6H, 2 × CH , t, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.29
6
3
(
4H, 2 × CH -CH -, m), 1.84 (4H, 2 × CH -CH -CH , m), 4.45 (4H,
3
2
2
2
2
2
8
× -CH -N, t, J = 7.0 Hz,), 5.28 (8H, 2 × N-CH -CH -N, s), 7.47-
2
2
2
.04 (12H, Ar-H, m), 9.91 (2H, NCHN, s), 10.20 (1H, NCHN, s).13
C
(
43%). M.p.: 254-257°C. Anal. Calc. for C66H76 Ag3F18 N12P .H O: C,
3 2
NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ ppm: 13.0 (CH ); 18.9, 30.2, 45.5, 47.0
6
3
43.69; H, 4.30; N, 9.26. Found: C, 43.30; H, 3.85; N, 9.19. FTIR (KBr)
(
(
CH ); 112.6, 113.6, 127.2, 127.8, 130.8, 131.2 (Ar-C); 143.2, 144.4
−1
2
ʋ (cm ): 3063 (Carom-H), 2958, 2873 (Caliph-H), 1614, 1481, 1450
NCHN).
Carom=Carom), 1271 (Caliph-N). 13C NMR (125 MHz, acetonitrile-d3)
(
δ ppm: 12.6 (CH ); 19.1, 31.8, 43.8, 49.5, 50.1 (CH ); 108.9, 110.6,
3
2
2
.2.2. Cyclopentyl substituted tris benzimidazolium bromide (3)
116.0, 121.2, 124.8, 133.7 (Ar-C); 187.8 (C-Ag, br d).
Salt 3 was prepared following the same procedures as described
for salt 2 except that salt II was replaced by III (1.05 g, 2.60 mmol),
benzimidazole (0.16 g, 1.30 mmol). Salt 3 was collected as white
precipitate. Yield: 0.57 g (57%). M.p.: 286-290°C. Anal. Calc. for
C35H41Br N : C, 53.50; H, 5.09; N, 10.70. Found: C, 53.77; H, 5.23;
2.2.6. Cyclopentyl substituted tri NHC-Ag(I) complex (8)
Complex 8 was prepared following the same procedures as
described for complex 7 except that salt 2 was replaced by 3
(0.41 g, 0.50 mmol) and silver oxide (0.35 g, 1.50 mmol). The
silver complex 8 was collected as white precipitate. Yield: 0.42
g (46%). M.p.: 272-277°C. Anal. Calc. for C70H76Ag3F18 N12P3: C,
46.62; H, 4.22; N, 9.32. Found: C, 46.97; H, 4.61; N, 9.56. FTIR
3
6
N, 10.88. FTIR (KBr) ʋ (cm 1): 3163, 3102 (Carom-H); 2968, 2884
−
(
Caliph-H), 1618, 1488, 1431 (Carom=Carom), 1561 (Carom-N), 1275
(
Caliph-N). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ ppm: 1.73-2.27 (16H,
6