1
620
C. V. Ste6ens et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 1619–1622
temperature over 2 weeks (88% yield). However, using
sensitive imines (e.g. Ar=pyridyl; R =Bn; 2 weeks; rt;
phosphoryl phosphonate 11 formed from chloroacetyl
1
chloride. The mechanism for this reaction was
18
99% yield), the reaction had to be performed at room
described by Britelli and involves a Perkow reaction
temperature leading to very long reaction times, mak-
ing this approach less practical. Furthermore, synthesis-
ing the aminophosphonate first also resulted in
problems in the acylation afterwards. The low reactivity
results from the low nucleophilicity of the nitrogen
followed by a Michaelis–Arbuzov reaction (Scheme 2).
In order to prove this hypothesis, an experiment was
done with chloroacetyl chloride and trimethyl phos-
31
phite. Comparison of the P NMR spectrum obtained
with those from the side product confirmed our pre-
sumption. Mechanistically, two possibilities for the for-
mation of the phosphonate 11 had to be considered.
The acylation reaction was not completed and the
phosphite reacted with the excess of acid chloride, or
the phosphite is able to abstract the acyl group from
the iminium salt. To investigate this last case, a very
small amount of the iminium salt was isolated free of
chloroacetyl chloride under an N2 atmosphere and
reacted with trimethyl phosphite. Again, phosphonate
11 was found in the reaction mixture. This indicates
that the formation of the side product is not due to the
presence of an excess of acid chloride in the reaction
mixture. Therefore, it will be necessary to alter the
reaction conditions in order to minimize the abstraction
of the acyl group and to maximize the addition to the
iminium salt in further investigations.
1
atom (e.g. Ar=pyridyl; R =naphthyl) because of the
strong electron withdrawing effect of the phosphonate
group. Therefore, we became interested in the evalua-
tion of a new approach trying to use the addition of a
phosphorus nucleophile onto an acylated iminium salt
(
Scheme 1).
First, attempts were made to isolate the iminium salts
after treatment of the aromatic imines with
2
chloroacetyl chloride. Unfortunately, due to the very
hygroscopic character of these iminium salts 3, they
could hardly be isolated and could not be characterised
properly. Therefore, after formation of the salts in
toluene at −40°C, which can be followed visually by
precipitation of the salts, the reaction mixture was
stirred for one additional hour, followed by addition of
the trialkyl phosphite. The best results were obtained
using trimethyl phosphite. Triethyl phosphite can be
used as well, however resulting in a lower yield. Triiso-
propyl phosphite proves to be too sterically hindered
for the addition. The aim of the reaction is the addition
of the phosphite to the activated iminium salt, generat-
ing a phosphonium salt which is then dealkylated by
The subsequent ring closure reactions were performed
with NaH in THF and the b-lactams were obtained in
good yields (71–99%). The formation of the b-lactam
ring via a C ꢀC bond is not exploited in detail, since
3
4
1
9,20
most lactams are prepared by a [2+2] cycloaddition.
17
the liberated chloride (Arbuzov type dealkylation).
However, the cycloaddition approach is not applicable
for the phosphono-b-lactams. These promising results
in the ring closure stimulate us to spend more time on
the optimisation of the addition reaction of phosphite
to the iminium salts.
Using trimethyl phosphite, methyl chloride is formed in
the reaction and bubbles out of the reaction mixture
(
CAUTION: the reaction should be performed in a
properly working hood), so that theoretically only the
desired aminophosphonate 5 is present in the mixture.
A further remarkable observation that still needs some
computational background, is the ring closure of
dimethyl 1-[benzyl(chloroacetyl)amino]-3-phenyl-2-pro-
penyl phosphonate 5a. Using sodium hydride as a base,
the highly stabilised anion 12 formed, ring closes exclu-
sively to the four membered ring 6a instead of to the
expected less strained six-membered ring 13 (Scheme 3).
However, a competing reaction complicated the addi-
tion and made the yields drop to 24–56% due to the
formation of some side products, which could not be
3
1
isolated in pure form. Examination of the P NMR
spectra of several compounds, revealed that two dou-
blets are always present. These were attributed to the
Scheme 1.