S.M. Bruno et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 799-800 (2015) 179e183
181
soluble under the conditions used. In separate tests carried out in
species involved, which was possibly not considerably affected by
the presence of the carboxylic acid group on one of the ligands.
the absence of substrate, solutions of complexes 1e4 in ethanol
ꢀ
were left at 35 or 55 C for 3 h, and then the solutions were
evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The FT-IR spectra
3.2. a-Pinene oxide ring-opening reaction via isomerization
(
not shown) of the resultant solids were unchanged from those of
ꢀ
the as-synthesized complexes, suggesting that the complexes are
stable under the catalytic reaction conditions used. The only reac-
tion product obtained in the alcoholysis reaction was 2-ethoxy-2-
phenylethanol, i.e. selectivity was always 100% (Fig. 1, Table 1).
Complexes 1 and 2 led to a very fast alcoholysis reaction, with
The reaction of PinOx in the presence of complexes 1e4, at 55 C
with DCE as solvent, gave mainly CPA, together with TCV, trans-
pinocarveol (PCV), and iso-pinocamphone (IPC) (Fig. 1, Table 2). As
found for ethanol, separate solubility tests performed for DCE in the
absence of substrate confirmed that the complexes are stable in this
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
00% conversion reached at 10 min/55 C or 30 min/35 C. Com-
solvent at 55 C (exemplified in Fig. 2 for complexes 3 and 4). The
plexes 3 and 4 led to a slower alcoholysis reaction, with 100%
conversion being reached at 2 h/55 C or 6 h/35 C for 3, and
best catalytic results in terms of CPA and TCV total yield at 24 h
were obtained for complex 4 (51% CPA yield and 21% TCV yield at
100% conversion). These results are superior to the total yields of
CPA and TCV reported previously by some of us for indenyl com-
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
9
0 min/55 C or 3 h/35 C for 4. Without catalyst, the reaction was
ꢀ
sluggish (3% StyOx conversion at 4 h/55 C), which emphasizes the
catalytic role of the molybdenum complexes. To the best of our
knowledge, there are no reports on the catalytic performance of
metal carbonyl complexes in the alcoholysis of StyOx. According to
the literature, the Lewis acid catalysed alcoholysis of StyOx may
involve the coordination of the oxygen atom of the epoxide to the
transition metal centre by an acidebase interaction, leading to an
increase in the electrophilicity of the carbon atom attached to the
phenyl group (polarisation of the CeO bond of the oxirane ring),
making it susceptible to nucleophilic attack by the alcohol (ROH) to
give the product [34,35].
5
3
plexes of the type [(
Si(CH ) [20], and somewhat inferior to those obtained with [{(
Ind)Mo(CO) -Cl)} ] [21] (Table 2). The observed differences in
h
-IndR)Mo(CO)
2
(
h
-C
3
H
5
)] (R ¼ H, CH
3
,
h -
5
3
)
3
2
(
m
2
catalytic results may be partly due to differences in catalyst solu-
bility, stability and acidity of active species.
As mentioned in the introduction, the isomerization of PinOx to
CPA tends to be promoted by Lewis acid catalysts, while Brønsted
acidity can favour TCV [36,37]. Hence, the catalytic results for 1e4
suggest that the active species are of Lewis acid type. Complex 2 led
to slower reaction than 1 and, on the other hand, complex 4 led to
faster reaction than 3. Thus, for each pair of complexes no direct
relationship between the Brønsted acidity associated with the
carboxylic acid groups and catalytic activity can be established.
The reaction of PinOx in the presence of complex 2 was further
examined using toluene or ethanol as solvent instead of DCE
(Table 2). The reaction rate decreased in the order
ethanol > toluene > DCE. On the other hand, the total yield of CPA
and TCV at 100% conversion was higher for toluene than for
ethanol. Unidentified reaction products were formed in ethanol,
which were not detected for the other solvents. Possibly, ethanol
acts as a non-innocent solvent (as is the case for the alcoholysis of
StyOx), broadening the product spectrum. A comparison of the
catalytic results for DCE and toluene as solvents shows that the
molar ratio TCV/CPA at 55e62% conversion is higher for the latter
(ca. 2.8 compared with 0.3 for DCE). The DCE solvent molecules
The catalytic stability was investigated by re-loading the sub-
strate to the same reactor where the catalyst was maintained. These
ꢀ
experiments were carried out at 35 C for complexes 1 and 2, and at
ꢀ
5
5 C for (less active) 3 and 4. For all complexes, at least 95% StyOx
conversion was reached, and 2-ethoxy-2-phenylethanol selectivity
was always 100% for four runs (Table 1). In general, an increase in
initial reaction rate was observed from run 1 to run 2, and for each
complex in runs 2e4 the activity was somewhat steady. Hence, the
increasing concentration of 2-ethoxy-2-phenylethanol in the re-
action medium did not have a negative effect on the kinetics of
consecutive runs. The catalytic results were roughly comparable for
each pair of complexes 1 and 2, or 3 and 4, and thus the carboxylic
acid groups of complexes 2 and 4 do not seem to exert a significant
influence on the alcoholysis reaction. The catalytic activity may be
associated with the Lewis acidity of the metal centre of the active
(
dielectric constant ¼ 10.36; dipole moment ¼ 1.75 D [38]) may
unfavourably interact with the carboxylic acid function of the
catalyst (e.g. via H-bonding), affecting TCV formation. These effects
may be less important for the much less polar solvent toluene
Table 1
a
Alcoholysis of styrene oxide with ethanol in the presence of complexes 1e4.
ꢀ
Conv. (%)b
Complex
Run
Time (min)
Temp. ( C)
(
dielectric constant ¼ 2.38; dipole moment ¼ 0.36 D [38]).
1
1
1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
1
1/10
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/10
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30/60/120
1/30
1/30
55
35
35
35
35
55
35
35
35
35
55
55
55
55
35
55
55
55
55
35
67/100
65/99
77/99
72/98
71/98
71/99
60/98
83/99
76/98
75/95
7/21/58/100
78/99
77/99
83/97
1/15/99
12/46/93/100
74/100
79/99
77/98
3/64/100
Attempts were made to identify metal species formed during
the catalytic reaction. This was accomplished for complex 4 by
adding pentane to the reaction solution after 3 h and 24 h (in
separate experiments), giving the solids denoted 4-DCE(cat-3h)
and 4-DCE(cat-24h), respectively. The FT-IR spectra of 4-DCE(cat-
2
3
4
3
h) and 4-DCE(cat-24h) were similar to that of 4, suggesting that
the predominant metal species were of the type 4 (Fig. 2). Never-
theless, it is worth mentioning that the colour of the catalytic re-
action solution changed slightly from yellow (initially) to greenish-
yellow after 24 h. Thus, one cannot rule out the possibility that
different active species may be formed from 4. It has been previ-
ously reported that molybdenum(II) carbonyl complexes can un-
dergo decarbonylation in the presence of air/water giving different
species [21]. Very small amounts of air and/or water may be dis-
solved in the reagents/solvent, and influence the stability of the
molybdenum carbonyl complexes.
1/30
1/60/360
1/30/60/90
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/60/180
a
Reaction conditions: 80
mmol of Mo, 0.82 mmol StyOx, 2.0 mL ethanol,
4
. Concluding remarks
[
Mo] ¼ 0.038 M.
b
StyOx conversion. The only product was 2-ethoxy-2-phenylethanol (100%
selectivity).
In this work we have shown that complexes of the type [(h
5-