COMMUNICATIONS
Atsushi Sato et al.
tion of phenol was disturbed by the addition of Fe(O-i- Acknowledgements
Pr) (entry 8), other additives such as Sn(IV) and
3
Thiswork was su pported by SORST, Japan Science and Tech-
nology Corporation (JST), the Tokuyama Science Foundation,
and the Iwatani Naoji Foundation.
Ga(III) could be used in place of Fe(III) (entries 9 and
0). The applicability of the present protocol to a
1
large-scale process (100 mmol scale, 0.1 mol % of
Zr(IV)ꢀFe(III) catalyst) is demonstrated in entry 4.
In summary, Fe(III), Ga(III), or Sn(IV) is required as
a co-catalyst of Zr(IV) or Hf(IV) not only to accelerate
the reaction rate but also to extract Zr(IV) or Hf(IV)
with ionic liquid 7 quantitatively. Although the role of
Fe(III), Ga(III), or Sn(IV) is not still clear, stable salt
complexes between 7 and the 1 to 1 molar ratio mixture
of binary metal ion species may be generated in situ. Fur-
ther studies on the mechanism of the esterification reac-
tion catalyzed by binary metal ion species are in progress
in our laboratory.
References and Notes
[
1] a) K. Ishihara, S. Ohara, H. Yamamoto, Science 2000,
90, 1140; b) K. Ishihara, M. Nakayama, S. Ohara, H. Ya-
2
mamoto, Synlett 2001, 1117; c) K. Ishihara, M. Nakaya-
ma, S. Ohara, H. Yamamoto, Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 8179.
2] R. A. Sheldon, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, S e´ rie IIc, Chimie/
Chemistry 2000, 3, 541.
[
[
[
3] J. Otera, Esterification, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
4] For esterification of carboxylic acids with equimolar
amounts of alcohols, see: a) K. Wakasugi, T. Misakai,
K. Yamada, Y. Tanabe, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
5249; b) K. Manabe, S. Iimura, X.-M. Sun, S. Kobayashi,
Experimental Section
[1,3,5f]
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11971; see also refs.
[
5] For reusable esterification catalysts, see: a) J. Xiang, S.
Toyoshima, A. Orita, J. Otera, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
N-Butylpyridinium Trifluoromethanesulfonimide
[
11]
(
7)
2
001, 40, 3670; b) J. Xiang, A. Orita, J. Otera, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2002, 344, 84; c) K. Ishihara, A. Hasegawa, H. Ya-
mamoto, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4077; d) K. Ish-
ihara, A. Hasegawa, H. Yamamoto, Synlett 2002, 1296;
e) K. Ishihara, A. Hasegawa, H. Yamamoto, Synlett
2002, 1299; f) M. Nakayama, A. Sato, K. Ishihara, H. Ya-
mamoto, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1275.
An equimolar of N-butylpyridinium bromide (21.6 g,
1
1
00 mmol) and lithium trifluoromethanesulfonimide (28.7 g,
00 mmol) in H O (175 mL) was heated at 708C for 12 h.
2
The resultingmixture was extracted with 100 mL of CH Cl ,
2
2
and concentrated. The crude oil was washed with a linear
EtOAc gradient in hexane and purified by column chromatog-
raphy on neutral active aluminium oxide usingEtOAc, and
dried under 0.04 torr to give 7 (d: 1.46) in quantitative yield.
IR (neat): n¼3095, 2969, 2880, 1636, 1490, 1351, 1192, 1141,
[6] Zr(OH) (OAc) , which is halide-free and commercially
x
y
available, is a good catalyst, as well as ZrCl ·2 THF
4
[5f]
and HfCl ·2 THF.
4
ꢀ
1
1
1
3
1
1
057, 789, 770, 740, 685 cm
;
H
NMR (DMSO-d ,
–1
6
[7] LD50 [ZrCl oral, rat] ¼1688 mgkg ; lethal intake of
4
00 MHz): d¼9.08 (d, J¼6.3 Hz, 2H), 8.61 (t, J¼8.1 Hz,
H), 8.16 (dd, J¼6.9, 7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.60 (t, J¼7.5 Hz, 2H),
.91 (tt, J¼7.5, 7.8 Hz, 2H), 1.28 (tq, J¼7.2, 7.8 Hz, 2H), 0.92
Fe(II or III)¼7–35 g, see: J. Emsley, The Elements; 3rd
edn., Clarendon, Oxford, 1998.
[
[
8] It is known that Hf(IV) and Zr(IV) do not catalyze
transesterification, while Ti(IV) catalyzes transesterifica-
(
t, J¼7.5 Hz, 3H); anal. calcd. for C H N F O S : C 31.73,
1
0
14
2
6
4 2
H 3.39, N 6.73%; found: C 31.74, H 3.44, N 6.80%.
[1]
tion.
9] a) J. Dupont, R. F. de Souza, P. A. Z. Suarez, Chem. Rev.
002, 102, 3667; b) C. Hilgers, P. Wasserscheid, in: Ionic
2
Typical Procedure for Direct Esterification Catalyzed
Liquidsin Synthe si s , (Eds.: P. Wasserscheid, T. Welton),
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003, p. 21.
by Zr(IV)ꢀFe(III) Complex and Catalyst Recycling
using 7
[
10] [EMIM][BF4]: ethylmethylimidazolium tetrafluorobo-
rate; [BMIM][PF ]: butylmethylimidazolium hexafluoro-
phosphate; [EMIM][OTf]: ethylmethylimidazolium tri-
A 20-mL, single-necked, round-bottomed flask equipped with
a Teflon-coated magnetic stirring bar and a Dean–Stark appa-
ratus surmounted by a reflux condenser was charged with car-
boxylic acid (5 mmol) and alcohol (5 mmol) as substrates and
Zr(O-i-Pr) (16.3 mg, 0.05 mmol) and Fe(O-i-Pr) (11.7 mg,
6
fluoromethanesulfonate; [BMIM][NTf
imidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonimide
]: butylmethyl-
(6);
2
[BPY][NTf ]: butylpyridinium trifluoromethanesulfon-
4
3
2
0.05 mmol) as catalysts in 7 (1 mL) and hydrocarbon
imide (7).
(
2.5 mL). The mixture was brought to reflux with the removal
[11] a) P. J. Dyson, G. Laurenczy, C. A. Ohlin, J. Vallance, T.
Welton, Chem. Commun. 2003, 2418; b) C. Hardacre,
J. D. Holbrey, S. P. Katdare, K. R. Seddon, Green
Chem. 2002, 4, 143.
of water. After the reaction was complete, the resultingmix-
ture was cooled to ambient temperature and a colorless hydro-
carbon layer was separated from a brown ionic liquid layer by
simple extraction with hexane-Et O. The desired ester was iso-
2
lated from a hydrocarbon layer by column chromatography on
silica gel. On the other hand, the Zr(IV)–Fe(III) catalyst that
remained in 7 was used directly in the next reaction without fur-
ther purification.
1340
ꢀ 2005 WILEY-VCH VerlagGmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
asc.wiley-vch.de
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 1337–1340