6398 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 40, No. 25, 2001
Hou and Kirkpatrick
a similar Larmor frequency, and the 6Li pulse length for the solids was
2 µs. The 6Li recycle time for the spectra reported here was 60 s. There
is no significant difference in the relative intensities of the 6Li spectral
components and their peak shapes between spectra collected with
recycle times of 20 and 60 s. MAS spinning frequencies were 9.5-11
kHz. Normally, 80-300 scans were acquired for each spectrum. An
exponential line broadening of 15 Hz was used to process the data
with the NUTs processing package. Line simulation and integration
Experimental Section
Sample Preparation. LiAl2(OH)6Cl‚nH2O samples were prepared
by the direct reaction of gibbsite with a LiCl solution.13 For each sample,
9 g of gibbsite and 15 g of LiCl were mixed with 25 mL of boiled
deionized (DI) water, and the mixture was reacted at 90 °C for 14 h in
a tightly sealed polyethylene bottle under strong stirring. The suspension
was centrifugally separated and ultrasonically washed for three cycles
using boiled DI water to remove the excess LiCl. The sample used
here (LiAlCl8) was then dried in a vacuum at room temperature for
several weeks. A high concentration of LiCl (14 M in our case) is
critical in the preparation of LiAl2(OH)6Cl‚nH2O by this method. Fogg
and O’Hare13 reported that the rate of the reaction is half-order with
respect to the initial concentration of LiCl. Our experience shows that
a significant formation of LiAl2(OH)6Cl‚nH2O using 0.5 M LiCl under
conditions similar to those described previously does not occur.
Calcination was conducted using the following methods. For
temperatures of 720 °C and below, aliquots of dried LiAlCl8 were
placed in a furnace at the desired temperature and heated for 6 h in air.
For temperatures of 850 °C and above, samples were placed in the
furnace at 850 °C, the furnace was ramped to the desired calcination
temperature over a few minutes, and the sample was held at the run
temperature for 3 h. In all of the cases, the samples were heated in
open Pt crucibles in air, allowed to cool to 200 °C in the furnace, and
then quickly removed to a desiccator with P2O5. After being cooled to
room temperature, five aliquots of the sample were stored in separate
vials in a glovebag for parallel XRD, NMR, and elemental analysis.
Sample Examination. Samples were examined by elemental
7
were also performed using the NUTs software. Li has a spin of I )
3/2, a large natural abundance (92.6%) and nuclear receptivity, and a
relatively small electric quadrupole moment.14,15 For our samples, only
7
one scan is required for good S/N ratios in the Li spectra.
Results and Interpretation
Chemical Analysis. The structural formula of the sample
used for the calcination experiments (LiAlCl8) based on
compositional analysis is Li0.970Al2.030(OH)6Cl0.977‚0.644H2O.
This composition conforms closely to the desired stoichiometric
composition of LiAl2(OH)6Cl‚H2O except that the analyzed
water content depends significantly on the drying and storage
conditions. Although LiCl was greatly in excess in the initial
mixture, the Al/Li molar ratio of the final product is close to 2,
consistent with a strict Al/Li ordering in the octahedral sheet.
This observation is in contrast to Mg/Al LDHs (hydrotalcites)
for which the final Al/Mg ratio can vary from 1/5 to 1/2 depending
on the initial solution Al/Mg ratio and the synthesis route.9 Here,
the analyzed Al/Li ratio is slightly larger than 2 because of a
small amount of gibbsite, as observed by XRD (Figure 1).
LiAlCl8 contains the least amount of gibbsite of all of the
samples that we synthesized and has an Al/Li ratio closest to
2. The gibbsite present could be unreacted starting material or
could have formed by the leaching of the LDH product during
washing.7 No carbonate was detected in LiAlCl8, although
contamination of LDHs by atmospheric CO2 is common and
was observed for our other samples.
Compositional analysis shows a significant decrease in the
Cl content and an increase in the Al/Li molar ratio in the cal-
cined samples. For the 850 °C sample, the elemental composi-
tion (wt %) is 43.01% Al, 3.88% Li, 2.54% Cl, 0.13% C, and
0.24% H and, for the 1100 °C sample, it is 49.25% Al, 2.80%
Li, 1.09% Cl, 0.05% C, and 0.04% H. On the basis of these
analyses, the atomic Al/Li ratios of these two samples are 2.85
and 4.52, respectively. These values are in good agreement with
the line fits of the 6Li NMR data, as discussed in the following
paragraphs.
TG and DSC. The TG and DSC curves obtained in Ar and
air are essentially identical, and only those under Ar are
presented here (Figure 2). For the sample LiAlCl8 (Figure 2a),
there are four well-defined endotherms with maxima at about
125, 355, 535, and 1020 °C, and each of these events has an
associated weight loss except for that at 535 °C. The three
observed weight loss events are readily assigned to the loss of
physically adsorbed and structural (interlayer) water at 125 °C,
dehydroxylation and partial dechlorination at 355 °C (see the
discussion of NMR data that follows), and volitalization of LiCl
at 1020 °C. The LiAl2 LDH compounds are well-known to lose
surface and interlayer water at quite low temperatures, and our
peak near 125 °C is in good agreement with the previous data.16
35Cl NMR and relative humidity (RH) controlled IR data (data
not shown) also show that samples equilibrated over P2O5 for
several days or that samples equilibrated in RH ) 0% air for 2
h lose most of their surface and interlayer water. The 355 °C
feature is relatively narrow for the dehydroxylation of an LDH,
analysis, XRD, TG, DSC, and 27Al , Li, Li, and 35Cl MAS NMR.
For elemental analysis, Li and Al and were determined using inductively
coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), C and H
were determined with a CHN analyzer, and Cl- was determined by
titration. Dissolution of the refractory high-temperature calcination
products was difficult, and these samples were dissolved in a mixture
of phosphoric and sulfuric acids at ∼250 °C for analysis. TG and DSC
data were recorded from room temperature to 1225 °C at a heating
rate of 10 °C min-1 in both Ar and air using a NETZSCH Simultaneous
Thermal Analyzer STA 409. Powder XRD patterns were recorded with
a Rigaku diffractometer using Cu KR radiation at a scanning rate of
1° 2θ min-1 and a step size of 0.02° 2θ. No special precautions were
taken to prevent a preferred orientation during sample loading or to
prevent the absorption of moisture. The samples were exposed to
ambient atmosphere during XRD data collection. The only apparent
effect of this was in the hydration of crystalline LiCl. KGa-1 kaolinite
(Clay Minerals Repository, University of Missouri, Columbia) was used
as an external XRD standard.
27Al and 35Cl MAS NMR spectra were collected at room temperature
using both a Varian 750 spectrometer (H0 ) 17.62 T) and a home-
built 500 MHz spectrometer (H0 ) 11.74 T) equipped with Doty
Scientific fast MAS probes. The calcined samples were quickly loaded
from their sealed containers into capped rotors just prior to data
collection to avoid moisture absorption. Aqueous solutions of 1 M AlCl3
and 1 M NaCl were used as external chemical-shift standards for 27Al
and 35Cl, respectively, and their chemical shifts were set at 0 ppm.
The measured 90° pulses for both of the solutions, 27Al and 35Cl, were
8 µs. Shorter pulses of 1 µs for 27Al and 3 µs for 35Cl were used for
the MAS NMR spectra of the solid samples to get better quantification.
Typically, a recycle time of 1 s was used for both 27Al and 35Cl.
6Li and 7Li MAS NMR spectra were recorded using the Varian 750
instrument only. A 1 M LiCl aqueous solution was used as an external
chemical-shift reference and set at 0 ppm. 6Li has a spin of I ) 1, low
relative abundance (7.4%), and a surprisingly long T1 but the smallest
electric quadrupole moment of any quadrupolar nuclide.14 Thus, its
spectral lines are very narrow, and it often provides higher resolution
than 7Li.14,15 This is the case here. The estimated 90° pulse for solution
6Li is 8.2 µs on the basis of the pulse length of 2H in 2H2O which has
6
7
(13) Fogg, A. M.; O’Hare, D. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1771-1775.
(14) Xu, Z.; Stebbins, J. F. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 1995, 5, 103-
112.
(15) Alam, T. M.; Conzone, S.; Brow, R. K.; Boyle, T. J. J. Non-Cryst.
Solids 1999, 140-154.
(16) Mascolo, G. Thermochim. Acta 1986, 102, 67-73.