T. Mori / Polyhedron 24 (2005) 2803–2807
2805
successfully determined with the [001] plane forming
large faces, however, we could not assign the explicit
in-plane alignment of the crystals by Laue photogra-
phy techniques. Such difficulty has been noticed for
other boron-rich systems like MgAlB14 and TbB50-type
compounds [13] and is generally attributed to the
complicated structure and weakness of reflection of
boron-rich compounds. However, in the case of the
GdB18Si5 crystals, it appears that there are multigrains
within the in-plane alignment which are aligned in
different directions in-plane (whereas these grains are
uniformly ordered along the [001] direction with the
[001] plane forming orderly). This is indicated from
magnetic measurements where the susceptibility below
TN did not differ largely despite incrementally rotating
the magnetic field direction in-plane, i.e., the spins are
antiferromagnetically aligned in-plane in a certain
direction [11] but due to the multigrains aligned in dif-
ferent directions in-plane, the observed susceptibility is
a sum of parallel and also perpendicular susceptibility
components. Despite not being able to resolve the
particular in-plane alignment of a single crystal piece,
the in-plane measurements carried out in this work
are still important because they obviously contain a
component of the parallel susceptibility and reflect its
behavior under magnetic field.
Fig. 2. Temperature dependence of the c-axis magnetic susceptibility
of GdB18Si5 for 16 kG (open circles), 14 kG (closed circles), 12 kG
(open triangles), 10 kG (closed squares), 8 kG (open diamonds), 6 kG
(closed triangles), 4 kG (crosses), and 2 kG (open squares). The lines
are guides to the eye.
Magnetic susceptibility was measured by using a
Quantum Design MPMS-XL SQUID magnetometer
from 1.8 to 300 K, with fields up to 70 kG. The magne-
tization was measured with the magnetic field applied
along the [001] c-axis and in-plane.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Magnetic field applied along the c-axis
Fig. 3. Magnetic phase diagram of GdB18Si5 with the field applied
along the c-axis. AF indicates the antiferromagnetic phase. The line is
a guide to the eye.
The temperature dependence of the magnetic sus-
ceptibility with the field applied along [001] for vari-
ous fields is plotted in Fig. 2. The c-axis is
perpendicular to the direction the spins are aligned
[11] and accordingly little temperature dependence of
the c-axis susceptibility is observed below the transi-
tion temperature. As is typical for antiferromagnetic
transitions, the transition temperature shifts to lower
temperatures as the magnetic field is increased. We
define TN as the intercept of the lower and higher
temperature region extrapolations. The magnetic
phase diagram is plotted in Fig. 3. The magnitude
of the magnetic field corresponds well with the tem-
perature scale observed here.
saturates to reach the full moment expected for the
8S7/2 ground state of Gd3+
.
3.2. Magnetic field applied in-plane
As noted in Section 2, the crystals of GdB18Si5 ap-
peared to be composed of multigrains which were not
uniformly aligned along a particular direction in the
in-plane direction (whereas the alignment of these
grains along the c-axis was uniformly very good owing
to large crystal planes of [001]). Due to the various
alignment of the multigrains leading to a summation
of both parallel and perpendicular components, a
rotation of the magnetic field within the in-plane
The magnetization curve at 1.8 K with field applied
along the c-axis is shown in Fig. 4. The magnetization
increases linearly as the field is increased until it reaches
a critical field HC around 15 kG (as can be estimated
from Fig. 3) after which the magnetization rapidly