071902-3
Koblmüller et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 071902 ͑2006͒
structural quality and smooth step-flow-like surface mor-
phologies were achieved in a rather low-temperature region
of 500–540 °C under In-rich conditions. The structural qual-
ity of InN was facilitated by the multiple effect of negligible
thermal decomposition at these temperatures and the autosur-
factant action of a 1 ML thick In adlayer on the surface. The
band gap of 0.651 eV and room-temperature PL peak emis-
sion at 0.626 eV of our optimized InN are among the lowest
reported values. In addition, Hall mobilities reached
2370 cm2/V s at bulk carrier concentrations in the low
1017 cm−3, and a surface accumulation layer with an electron
density of ϳ3ϫ1013 cm−2 was determined.
The authors gratefully acknowledge C. G. Van de Walle
and D. Segev for many helpful discussions. This work was
supported by DARPA ͑CNID program͒ and AFOSR ͑D. J.
Silversmith, program manager͒.
FIG. 2. Band gap obtained from absorption data and PL spectrum from
optimized N-face InN samples.
1V. Yu. Davydov, A. A. Klochikhin, R. P. Seisyan, V. V. Emtsev, S. V.
Ivanov, F. Bechstedt, J. Furthmüller, H. Harima, A. V. Mudryi, J.
Aderhold, O. Semchinova, and J. Graul, Phys. Status Solidi B 229, R1
͑2002͒.
thick N-face GaN buffer layer grown on semi-insulating
C-face 6H–SiC substrates. To facilitate this we performed
Hall measurements at 300 K on the as-grown InN layers
͑containing a small density of In droplets͒, with their results
shown in Fig. 3. The Hall electron mobility increases con-
tinually with increasing layer thickness, reaching a maxi-
mum mobility of 2370 cm2/V s for a layer thickness of
4.4 m. These electron mobilities are almost a factor of 2
higher, and the corresponding bulk carrier concentration of
2.8ϫ1017 cm−3 is nearly one order of magnitude lower than
those reported for the best MBE grown N-face InN.15 By
linear extrapolation of the sheet carrier concentration of the
InN layers to zero thickness ͑for a series of samples grown
to different InN thickness͒, a surface electron accumula-
tion layer density of ϳ3ϫ1013 cm−2 was determined. The
surface carrier concentration is in close agreement with
the ϳ2.5ϫ1013 cm−2 density determined independently by
energy electron loss spectroscopy and theoretical
calculations.27 Despite this consistency, we suggest that a
more detailed analysis is needed for differentiating between
bulk conduction and surface or interface conduction.
2J. Wu, W. Walukiewicz, K. M. Yu, J. W. Ager, E. E. Haller, H. Lu, W. J.
Schaff, Y. Saito, and Y. Nanishi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3967 ͑2002͒.
3T. Matsuoka, H. Okamoto, M. Nakao, H. Harima, and E. Kurimoto, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 81, 1246 ͑2002͒.
4R. Ascazubi, I. Wilke, K. Denniston, H. Lu, and W. J. Schaff, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 84, 4810 ͑2004͒.
5M. Higashiwaki and T. Matsui, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 41, L540
͑2002͒.
6V. M. Polyakov and F. Schwierz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 032101 ͑2006͒.
7S. K. O’Leary, B. E. Foutz, M. S. Shur, and L. F. Eastman, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 87, 222103 ͑2005͒.
8J. Wu, W. Walukiewicz, W. Shan, K. M. Yu, J. W. Ager, S. X. Li, E. E.
Haller, H. Lu, and W. J. Schaff, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 4457 ͑2003͒.
9C. S. Gallinat, G. Koblmüller, S. Bernardis, J. S. Brown, J. S. Speck, G. D.
Chern, E. D. Readinger, H. Shen, and M. Wraback, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,
032109 ͑2006͒.
10H. Lu, W. J. Schaff, J. Hwang, H. Wu, G. Koley, and L. F. Eastman, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 79, 1489 ͑2001͒.
11Y. Saito, N. Teraguchi, A. Suzuki, T. Araki, and Y. Nanishi, Jpn. J. Appl.
Phys., Part 2 40, L91 ͑2001͒.
12C. J. Lu, L. A. Bendersky, H. Lu, and W. J. Schaff, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83,
2817 ͑2003͒.
13E. Dimakis, E. Iliopoulos, K. Tsagaraki, and A. Georgakilas, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 86, 133104 ͑2005͒.
In summary, systematic growth kinetics studies were
conducted to optimize the surface and structural properties of
N-face InN grown on freestanding GaN. InN films with high
14T. Ive, O. Brandt, M. Ramsteiner, M. Giehler, H. Kostial, and K. H. Ploog,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1671 ͑2004͒.
15K. Xu and A. Yoshikawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 251 ͑2003͒.
16H. Naoi, F. Matsuda, T. Araki, A. Suzuki, and Y. Nanishi, J. Cryst. Growth
269, 155 ͑2004͒.
17B. Heying, R. Averbeck, L. F. Chen, E. Haus, H. Riechert, and J. S. Speck,
J. Appl. Phys. 88, 1855 ͑2000͒.
18G. Koblmüller, R. Averbeck, L. Geelhaar, H. Riechert, W. Hoesler, and P.
Pongratz, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 9591 ͑2003͒.
19S. Rajan, M. Wong, Y. Fu, F. Wu, J. S. Speck, and U. K. Mishra, Jpn. J.
Appl. Phys., Part 2 44, L1478 ͑2005͒.
20E. Monroy, E. Sarigiannidou, F. Fossard, N. Gogneau, E. Bellet-Amalric,
J.-L. Rouviere, S. Monnoye, H. Mank, and B. Daudin, Appl. Phys. Lett.
84, 3684 ͑2004͒.
21A. R. Smith, R. M. Feenstra, D. W. Greve, M. S. Shin, M. Skowronski, J.
Neugebauer, and J. E. Northrup, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2114 ͑1998͒.
22G. Koblmüller, C. S. Gallinat, and J. S. Speck ͑unpublished͒.
23G. Koblmüller, R. Averbeck, H. Riechert, and P. Pongratz, Phys. Rev. B
69, 035325 ͑2004͒.
24B. Heying, X. H. Wu, S. Keller, Y. Li, D. Kapolnek, B. P. Keller, S. P.
DenBaars, and J. S. Speck, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 643 ͑1996͒.
25V. V. Mamutin, V. A. Vekshin, V. Y. Davydov, V. V. Ratnikov, T. V.
Shubina, S. V. Ivanov, P. S. Kopev, M. Karlsteen, U. Södervall, and M.
Willander, Phys. Status Solidi A 176, 247 ͑1999͒.
FIG. 3. Dependence of room-temperature Hall mobility and sheet carrier
concentration on layer thickness for InN grown on N-face GaN on C-face
6H–SiC templates. A linear extrapolation of the carrier concentration to zero
thickness yields an estimate of ϳ3ϫ1013 cm−2 for the surface electron
26M. Higashiwaki and T. Matsui, J. Cryst. Growth 269, 162 ͑2004͒.
27I. Mahboob, T. D. Veal, C. F. McConville, H. Lu, and W. J. Schaff, Phys.
density.
Rev. Lett. 92, 036804 ͑2004͒.
89.132.144.249 On: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:18:23