9
650 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 20, 2010
Dixon and Hayward
to remove any lithium-containing phases (LiH and Li
being dried under vacuum.
2
O) before
Characterization. X-ray powder diffraction data were col-
lected using a PANalytical X’Pert diffractometer incorporating
an X’celerator position-sensitive detector (monochromatic Cu
KR1 radiation). Data were collected from air-sensitive samples
under an inert atmosphere using a homemade gas-tight sample
holder. Electron diffraction patterns were collected from sam-
ples supported on lacy carbon grids (deposited from suspension
in chloroform) using a JEOL 2000FX microscope operating at
200 kV. Neutron powder diffraction data were collected in the
temperature range 5 < T/K< 300 from samples contained in
vanadium cans, sealed under argon with indium washers, at a
˚
wavelength of λ = 1.59 A using the D2b diffractometer (ILL
neutron source, Grenoble, France). Additional data sets were
collected in the temperature range 300<T/K<388 using the
POLARIS diffractometer (ISIS neutron source, U.K.) from
samples contained in vanadium cans sealed under argon using
a copper gasket. Rietveld profile refinement was performed
1
0
using the GSAS suite of programs. Average iron oxidation
states in all phases were determined by iodiometric titration.
Approximately 50 mg of material was placed in a three-necked
flask under an argon atmosphere. The solid was then dissolved
in 1.1 M HCl containing an excess of KI, and the liberated I was
2
2 2 3
titrated with previously standardized Na S O under an argon
Figure 1. The crystal structures of the n=2 Ruddlesden-Popper phases
Sr Fe Cl and Sr Fe
3
O
2 5
2
3
2 7
O .
square-planar Fe(II) centers, providing a structural contrast
to the recently reported phases SrFeO and Sr Fe O , which
2
3
2
5
5,6
contain similar iron coordination sites.
purge to prevent oxidation by the air. Titrations were repeated
three times or until a consistent result was obtained.
Experimental Section
Preparation of Sr
3
Fe
2
O
5
Cl
2
. Samples of Sr
3
Fe
2
O
5
Cl
2
were
prepared by a direct-combination route that has previously been
Results
7
described by Weller et al. Suitable quantities of SrO (prepared
Reactivity of Sr Fe O Cl . X-ray powder diffraction
3 2 4 2
data collected from the products of the reaction between
Sr Fe O Cl and LiH reveal that at temperatures below
by the decomposition of SrCO
SrCl
(dried at 180 °C under vacuum), and Fe
9.99%) were thoroughly mixed with an agate pestle and mortar
in an argon-filled glovebox (O and H O levels<1 ppm). The
3
at 1100 °C under vacuum),
O
3
(Alfa Aesar,
3
2
5
2
2
2
9
350 °C no reaction occurs. Reactions performed at tem-
peratures above 400 °C result in the decomposition of the
ternary oxychloride phase and the formation of Sr FeO Cl,
2
2
mixture was then heated in an evacuated silica ampule at 850 °C
for 2 periods of 24 h with one intermediate grinding. X-ray
powder diffraction data collected from this material were con-
sistent with a single phase with lattice parameters a = 3.947(1) A
˚
and c = 23.786(1) A in good agreement with previously reported
2
3
elemental iron, and LiFeO . In the temperature range
2
3
50<T/°C<400, reactions resulted in the formation of a
body-centered tetragonal phase consistent with the topo-
tactic reduction of Sr Fe Cl
˚
7
3
2
O
5
.
2
˚
˚
values (a = 3.946(1) A, c =23.786(1) A).
Reduction of Sr Fe Cl
performed using LiH as a solid state reducing agent. Small
Fe Cl were ground together in a 1:4
Structural Characterization. X-ray powder diffraction
data collected from the washed product of the reaction
between Sr Fe O Cl and LiH at 350 °C could be readily
3
O
2 5
2 3 2 5 2
. The reduction of Sr Fe O Cl was
8
samples (∼300 mg) of Sr
3
2
O
5
2
3
2
5
2
molar ratio with LiH in an argon-filled glovebox. These mix-
tures were then sealed under vacuum in Pyrex ampules and
heated at temperatures between 210 and 400 °C to monitor the
temperature dependence of the reduction reaction. Due to the
hazards associated with the production of hydrogen gas when
indexed on the basis of a body-centered tetragonal unit
˚
cell (a=4.009(1) A, c=22.638(1) A) consistent with the
˚
topotactic reduction of Sr Fe O Cl to a phase of com-
2
position Sr Fe O Cl . In contrast to the X-ray powder
3
3
2
5
2
5-x
2
diffraction data, neutron powder diffraction data col-
lected at room temperature from Sr Fe O Cl exhib-
ited a series of large d-spacing diffraction features which
are inconsistent with the simple body-centered tetragonal
cell described above (Figure 2). These additional diffrac-
tion features could be indexed using a unit cell related to
the X-ray cell by an a = 2a, b = 2b, c =c geometric
expansion. In order to confirm the size and symmetry
of the crystallographic unit cell, electron diffraction data
were collected. As can be seen in Figure 3, these data
could be readily indexed using the body-centered tetra-
gonal cell determined from the X-ray powder diffraction
data, suggesting the additional features observed in the
neutron diffraction data are due to magnetic order.
This was further confirmed by the observation that the
8
using LiH as a reducing agent, large-scale samples suitable
for characterization by neutron powder diffraction were pre-
3
2
5-x
2
pared by means of a spring-loaded venting apparatus described
was mixed in a
9
previously. Approximately 4 g of Sr
3
Fe
2
O
5
Cl
2
1
2
:4 molar ratio with LiH and heated at 350 °C for 4 periods of
4 h with intermediate grinding. The sample was then heated for
a further 48 h in an evacuated Pyrex ampule. After reaction, the
sample was washed under nitrogen with 4 ꢀ 100 mL of methanol
√
√
0
0
0
(
5) Tsujimoto, Y.; Tassel, C.; Hayashi, N.; Watanabe, T.; Kageyama, H.;
Yoshimura, K.; Takano, M.; Ceretti, M.; Ritter, C.; Paulus, W. Nature 2007,
50, 1062–1065.
6) Hiroshi, K.; Takashi, W.; Yoshihiro, T.; Atsushi, K.; Yuji, S.;
Kazuyoshi, K.; Kazuyoshi, Y.; Naoaki, H.; Shigetoshi, M.; Mikio, T.;
Monica, C.; Werner, P.; Clemens, R.; Gilles, A. Angew. Chem. 2008, 47, 5740–
4
(
5
745.
(
7) Dann, S. E.; Weller, M. T.; Currie, D. B. J. Solid State Chem. 1992, 97,
1
79–185.
(
8) Adkin, J. J.; Hayward, M. A. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 10959–10964.
(10) Larson, A. C.; Von Dreele, R. B. General Structure Analysis System,
Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR 86-748, Los Alamos National
Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, 2000.
(
9) O’Malley, M.; Lockett, M. A.; Hayward, M. A. J. Solid State Chem.
2
007, 180, 2851–2858.