We reasoned that the inefficiency of these conventional
methods could be overcome if the required enolates were
formed under soft rather than hard conditions. In hard
enolization the required enolates are preformed by treatment
with a strong, non-nucleophilic base such as LDA (Scheme
provide the basis for workable solutions to the aforemen-
tioned problems associated with the synthesis of 1,3-
diketones.
To explore the use of soft enolization in 1,3-diketone
synthesis, acetophenone (6) was combined with benzoyl
chloride (7), MgBr
2
‚OEt
2 2 2 2
, and i-Pr NEt in CH Cl (Scheme
1). While effective, these stepwise procedures are time-
2
). The desired 1,3-diketone (8) was indeed isolated from
Scheme 1. Hard and Soft Enolate Formation
Scheme 2. MgBr
2
2
‚OEt -Promoted Direct Acylation of
Acetophenone and Representative Acid Chlorides
this reaction in very good yield (83%) after only 1 h. A
control experiment was carried out in which acetophenone
and benzoyl chloride were combined in CH
presence of i-Pr NEt but in the absence of MgBr
no coupled product observed after 24 h, thus confirming the
essential nature of the Lewis acid in enolization. Encouraged
2
Cl
‚OEt
2
in the
2
, with
consuming, particularly if enolate trapping is involved, and
require that all manipulations be conducted under anhydrous
conditions and, when strong bases are used, at low temper-
atures. An alternative is soft enolization (Scheme 1), which
does not employ a strong base and, consequently, can be
conducted under less stringent conditions (e.g., open to the
2
2
by the result with MgBr
2 2
‚OEt , we conducted a similar
reaction with the aliphatic system, 3,3-dimethylbutanoyl
chloride (9). In this case the desired product (10) was also
obtained, but in a somewhat lower yield (65%). Use of
pentanoyl chloride (11) as the acylating agent also gave the
desired â-diketone (12), albeit in a much lower yield (30%)
due to formation of the R,R-bis-acylation byproduct (13),
as is typical when acid chlorides are used in enolate
acylations. None of the reactions showed any improvement
in yield when left for greater than 1 h.
4
air, untreated solvent, rt) than are required of hard enoliza-
tion. In soft enolization, a weak base and a Lewis acid act
in concert to effect deprotonation reversibly. Here, the Lewis
acid interacts with the carbonyl oxygen to polarize it beyond
its normal state, resulting in a substantial increase in the
acidity of the R-proton, to the extent that it can be removed
appreciably by the weak base. Since enolization in this case
is reversible, it is conducted in a direct fashion in the presence
of the electrophilic species, further simplifying the procedure.
In addition, when applied in acylation reactions the â-di-
Significantly, in the two reactions involving 9 and 11, no
products were detected corresponding to self-acylation of the
acid chloride (14 or 15, respectively, Scheme 3). This is
2
carbonyl product (3, E ) COR , Y ) alkyl/aryl, Scheme 1)
that forms would not be expected to interfere in a detrimental
way, as in situations employing hard enolization. Deproto-
nation of this species by the ketone enolate (cf. 5, Y ) alkyl/
aryl) would undoubtedly occur, but in a reversible sense such
that the intended ketone enolate could reform and eventually
undergo the desired acylation. Given the relatively weak
nucleophilic nature of the dicarbonyl enolate, bis-acylation
should not occur with appropriate choice of acylating agent.
Scheme 3. Mechanistic Considerations in the
‚OEt -Promoted Direct Acylation with Acid Chlorides
2
MgBr
2
We recently reported the initial stages of development of
an efficient MgBr
simple thioesters based on soft enolization. The reaction is
conducted with inexpensive MgBr ‚OEt in untreated, reagent-
grade solvent open to the air, and produces innocuous
byproducts on workup. Given the efficiency, mildness, and
operational simplicity of this reaction, we felt that it might
2
‚OEt
2
-promoted direct aldol addition of
understandable if it is assumed that the reaction is facilitated
by coordination of Mg to the carbonyl oxygen (1 f 16),
4
2+
followed by deprotonation to form the enolate (16 f 17),
rather than on the basis of R-proton acidity alone. In such a
case, despite greater acidity predicted for the acid chloride
R-protons (1, Y ) Cl) compared to the ketone (1, Y ) alkyl/
aryl), its relatively electron deficient carbonyl oxygen would
be less prone to coordination to the electrophilic metal salt
(1 f 16, Y ) Cl) and, correspondingly, enolate formation,
2
2
(
4) Zhou, G.; Yost, J. M.; Coltart, D. M. Synthesis 2007, 478-482. Yost,
J. M.; Zhou, G.; Coltart, D. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1503-1506.
4140
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 21, 2007