limited possibilities for varying these syntheses, we have
turned our attention to the remarkable family of difluoro-
bora-diaza-s-indacene (“F-Bodipy”) dyes. These are par-
ticularly intriguing molecules for several reasons:8,9,13 (i) they
combine high molar absorptivities with very high fluores-
cence quantum yields; (ii) their optical properties can be
tuned by modifying the pyrrole unit and/or the bridge of the
pyrromethene unit and/or, as shown recently, the boron
substituents; (iii) they are chemically and photochemically
stable in solution and in the solid state; and (iv) they are
redox active both as oxidants and as reductants.
and emits at 780 nm with a quantum yield of 20% when
excited in the lower energy absorption band (Figure 2), thus
The focus of the present work is the issue of whether or
not a range of F-Bodipy derivatives can be obtained showing
both absorption and emission in the near-infrared area (in
particular, 720-780 nm; Figure 1A). To this end, we have
Figure 2. Absorption, emission spectra of starting material 1
(green) and pivotal intermediate 5 (black) in CH2Cl2, at rt.
largely satisfying the demands specified above for a near-
infrared active material. Its excitation and absorption spectra
match precisely, indicating that the emission results from
the S1fS0 transition. The Stokes’ shift, however, as expected
for an organic singlet emitter, is relatively small (∆ν ) 930
cm-1), but slightly larger than in dipyrromethene dyes.17
The promising characteristics of 1 prompted us to examine
further functionalization involving attachment of arylalkynide
fragments at boron, the aryl substituents involving both metal
ion chelating and luminescent polycyclic aromatic units. Our
earlier observation was that 1 was not resistant to substitution
using 4-lithioethynyltoluene or 1-lithioethynylpyrene, prob-
ably as a result of deprotonation of the relatively acidic meso-
proton. This problem could be readily circumvented, how-
ever, by using alkynyl-Grignard reagents in place of the
lithium species, enabling 2 to be obtained readily and in good
yield (Scheme 1).
Figure 1. General formulas for F-Bodipy and E-Bodipy.
explored the substitution of the fluoride ligands on boron
by polyaryl-alkynide ligands (Figure 1B), the aryl substitu-
ents being designed to produce large virtual Stokes’ shifts
by virtue of intramolecular energy transfer.
While trigonal alkynylboranes14 are well-characterized
species, much less is known of tetrahedral alkynylborates15,16
and thus we have explored their synthesis in some detail.
The systems developed significantly extend the scope of
available indacene-dye derivatives and provide photo- and
electroactive materials with potential applications in both
biological analysis and various light-emitting devices.
Our earlier work involving introduction of oligopyridine
substituents onto the meso position of F-Bodipy’s demon-
strated that this could produce highly luminescent materials,
soluble in polymeric matrices, of considerable promise in
sensors17 and electroluminescent devices.18 The pivotal
building block 119 absorbs at 727 nm (ꢀ ) 90 000 M-1 cm-1)
Scheme 1
(12) Montalti, M.; Prodi, L.; Zaccheroni, N.; Zattoni, A.; Reschiglian,
P.; Falini, G. Langmuir 2004, 20, 2989.
(13) (a) Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R. Synlet. 2004, 439. (b) Ulrich, G.; Ziessel,
R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2070. (c) Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 1949.
Thus, our present target became the substitution of the
fluoro ligands by sophisticated arylalkynyl entities. Crucial
to the success of the strategy adopted was the unsymmetrical
functionalization of 1,4-diiodobenzene with acetylenic units
bearing different protecting groups (Scheme 2).
Our earlier work on bipyridine derivatives provided
appropriate inspiration.20 Thus, compound 6 could be
selectively deprotected on the 2-hydroxyprop-2-yl side by
using an alkali metal hydroxide under anhydrous conditions.
(14) (a) Yamaguchi, S.; Akiyama, S.; Tamao, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 6335. (b) Jia, W.-L.; Saong, D.; Wang, S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
701. (c) Kubo, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Ikeda, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Shinkai, S.;
Yamaguchi, S.; Tamao, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2003, 42, 2036.
(15) (a) Qian, B.; Baek, S. W.; Smith, M. R., III Polyhedron 1999, 18,
2405. (b) Ding, L.; Ma, K.; Du¨rner, G.; Bolte, M.; Fabrizi de Biani, F.;
Zanello, P.; Wagner M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2002, 1566.
(16) Ulrich, G.; Goze, C.; Guardigli, M.; Roda, A.; Ziessel, R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3694.
(17) Goze, C.; Ulrich, G.; Charbonnie`re, L.; Ziessel, R. Chem. Eur. J.
2003, 9, 3748.
(18) Hepp, A.; Ulrich, G.; Schmechel, R.; von Seggern, H.; Ziessel, R.
Synth. Met. 2004, 146, 11.
(19) Kang, H. C.; Haugland, R. P. U.S. Patent 5,433,896, July 18, 1995.
(20) Goeb, S.; De Nicola, A.; Ziessel, R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1518.
738
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 5, 2007