electron-donating or -withdrawing groups and also the manner
in which they function.
Conclusions
From the experimental data obtained, we find that the rate of
substitution of the chloride moiety by the selected nucleophiles
from Pt2 proceeds at a slower rate than that from Pt1. This
retardation in the rate of substitution has been attributed to the
presence of the electron-donating substituents in the ancillary
positions of the terpyridyl ligand in Pt2 which leads to a reduction
in the p-acceptor properties of the terpyridyl ring and subsequently
a less electropositive metal centre.
The experimental and computational results clearly illustrate
that the moderate decrease in reactivity of the metal centre upon
introduction of electron-donating groups is as a result of a decrease
in the positive charge of the metal centre and a corresponding
increase in the energy separation of the frontier molecular orbitals
(DE).
The introduction of electron-withdrawing groups leads to an
increase in the positive charge of the metal centre and correspond-
ing decrease in DE and should result in increased reactivity of the
metal centre. By placing these ancillary substituents in both the
cis and trans positions, we find that (i) the overall trans-influence
is greater than the overall trans-effect; and (ii) the overall p cis-
effect is greater than the overall p trans-effect. The strength of
the electron-donating or -withdrawing groups controls the overall
extent of p backdonation from the metal centre into the empty
ligand orbitals.
The manner in which some atoms or groups can withdraw or
donate electrons into a system can be through either inductive
(movement of electron density through s-bonds) or resonance
(movement of electron density through p-bonds) effects or a
combination of the two.40,41
From these, there are six possible combinations in which
electron-density distribution in a system can be achieved:40
(1) Groups that withdraw electrons by inductive effects only, e.g.
+
–CF3, –NH3 .
(2) Groups that donate electrons by inductive effects only, e.g.
–CH3, –CH2CH3, –CH(CH3)2.
(3) Groups that withdraw electrons through resonance only, e.g.
–CN, –COH, –CO2R (where R is any alkyl group).
(4) Groups that withdraw electrons both inductively and through
resonance, e.g. –NO2.
(5) Groups that withdraw electrons inductively but donate
electrons through resonance e.g. –OH, –NH2, –X (where X is a
halide moiety).
(6) Groups that can withdraw or donate electrons through
resonance, e.g. –Ph, –CHCH2.
From the combinations given, it can be clearly seen how the
ancillary groups chosen for the computational study function and
allows us to explain in detail the trends observed.
In the case of the electron-withdrawing groups, the trend
observed from the computed data correlates well with those in
literature. Groups such as the cyano (–CN) or nitro (–NO2) groups,
are known to strongly withdraw electron-density40,41 and the pres-
ence of these in the ancillary positions of the terpyridyl fragment
leads to greatest decrease in DE and also the greater positive charge
on the metal centre when compared to [Pt(terpy)Cl]+.
The fact that these effects are slightly more pronounced for
the nitro group than for the cyano group can be explained by
considering the combinations give above, in which the nitro groups
withdraws electron-density by both inductive and resonance
effects, whereas the cyano group is only electron-withdrawing
through resonance effects.
The current study thus consolidates the role of electron-
donating and electron-withdrawing groups in controlling the
reactivity of platinum(II) terpyridyl complexes.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the
University of KwaZulu-Natal and the South African National
Research Foundation (NRF). We are also grateful to the Alexan-
der von Humboldt Foundation for the donation of a UV-Vis
spectrophotometer to the University of KwaZulu-Natal.
In the case of the electron-withdrawing substituent being
the chloro (–Cl) moiety, the values obtained are slightly less
than those for cyano or nitro, since halide ions are consid-
ered to be weaker electron-withdrawing groups as a result of
them withdrawing electrons inductively but donating electrons
through resonance. However the electron-withdrawing ability,
as a result of the electronegativity of chlorine, is greater than
its electron-donating ability, due to poorer overlap of the 3p
orbital of chlorine with the 2p orbital of the carbon it is
attached to.
In the case of the amino (–NH2), methoxy (–OMe) and hydroxy
(–OH) groups, we find that these operate anti to the chloride
group in that they donate more electron-density through resonance
effects than they accept electron-density through inductive effects.
This is anticipated as a result of the lone pairs of electrons
present in these groups being in close proximity to the extended
p-conjugation of the terpyridyl fragment allowing for greater
delocalization into the pyridyl rings. The tert-butyl group also
functions as an electron-donating group, but primarily through
inductive effects, with increased branching in the alkyl group
leading to better electron-donating properties.
References
1 D. T. Richens, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 1961.
2 M. L. Tobe and J. Burgess, Inorganic Reaction Mechanisms, Addison
Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, 1999, p. 30–43, 70–112.
3 J. D. Atwood, Inorganic and Organometallic Reaction Mechanisms,
Wiley-VCH Inc., NY, 2nd edn, 1997, p. 43–61.
4 R. B. Jordan, Reaction Mechanisms of Inorganic and Organometallic
Systems, Oxford University Press Inc., NY, 1991, p. 29–74.
5 R. G. Wilkins, Kinetics and Mechanism of Reactions Transition Metal
Complexes, VCH, Weinheim, 2nd edn,1991, p.199-201, 221, 232–242.
6 R. J. Cross, Adv. Inorg. Chem., 1989, 34, 219.
7 R. J. Cross, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1985, 14, 197.
8 U. Fekl and K. I. Goldberg, Adv. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 54, 260.
9 B. Lippert, Cisplatin. Chemistry and Biochemistry of a Leading Anti-
cancer Drug, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999.
10 N. Farrell, Transition Metal Complexes as Drugs and Chemotherapeutic
Agents, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989.
11 S. Lanza, D. Minniti, P. Moore, J. Sachinidis, R. Romeo and M. L.
Tobe, Inorg. Chem., 1984, 23, 4428.
12 S. Lanza, D. Minniti, R. Romeo, P. Moore, J. Sachinidis and M. L.
Tobe, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1984, 542.
13 G. Alibrandi, G. Bruno, S. Lanza, D. Minniti, R. Romeo and M. L.
Tobe, Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26, 185.
14 R. Romeo, A. Grassi and L. M. Scolaro, L., Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31,
4383.
6730 | Dalton Trans., 2008, 6724–6731
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
©