2958 J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 49, No. 6, 2001
van den Heuvel et al.
(9) Lomascolo, A.; Stentelaire, C.; Asther, M.; Lesage-
Meessen, L. Trends Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 282-289.
(10) Overhage, J .; Priefert, H.; Rabenhorst, J .; Steinbuechel,
A. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 52, 820-828.
(11) Li, T.; Rosazza, J . P. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66,
684-687.
(12) Walton, N. J .; Narbad, A.; Faulds, C. B.; Williamson,
G. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 490-496.
(13) de J ong, E.; van Berkel, W. J . H.; van der Zwan, R. P.;
de Bont, J . A. M. Eur. J . Biochem. 1992, 208, 651-657.
(14) Fraaije, M. W.; Veeger, C.; van Berkel, W. J . H. Eur. J .
Biochem. 1995, 234, 271-277.
(15) van Berkel, W. J . H.; Fraaije, M. W.; de J ong, E. Process
for Producing 4-Hydroxycinnamyl Alcohols; 1997,
European Patent Application 071028gB1.
(16) Oi, Y.; Kawada, T.; Watanabe, T.; Iwai, K. J . Agric. Food
Chem. 1992, 40, 467-470.
(17) Park, Y. H.; Lee, S. S. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 1994,
34, 351-360.
(18) Ogata, N.; Baba, T. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol.
Pharmacol. 1989, 66, 411-423.
(19) Dyreborg, S.; Arvin, E.; Broholm, K. Biodegradation
1996, 7, 191-201.
(20) Fraaije, M. W.; van den Heuvel, R. H. H.; Roelofs, J . C.
A. A.; van Berkel, W. J . H. Eur. J . Biochem. 1998, 253,
712-719.
(21) van den Heuvel, R. H. H.; Fraaije, M. W.; Laane, C.;
van Berkel, W. J . H. J . Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 5646-5651.
(22) van den Heuvel, R. H. H.; Fraaije, M. W.; Mattevi, A.;
van Berkel, W. J . H. J . Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 14799-
14808.
of the phenol decreases from 9.8 to 5.0 (14). Possibly,
binding of vanillylamine to the enzyme does not stimu-
late phenol deprotonation. Alternatively, the pH effect
might be related to the preferred binding of the pheno-
late form of vanillylamine. On the other hand, the
protonation state of the amide moiety of vanillylamine
might also be of importance for its reactivity.
In conclusion, this paper presents two novel enzy-
matic routes for the biocatalytic production of natural
vanillin. The bienzymatic process from capsaicin to
vanillin is most promising from a biotechnological point
of view, as capsaicin is a widely available compound.
To make this process more feasible, the first enzyme in
the reaction sequence, a carboxylesterase, needs to be
characterized in detail and overexpressed in a suitable
host. The VAO-catalyzed deamination of vanillylamine
is efficient, does not need any external cofactors, and
uses molecular oxygen as a clean and mild oxidant.
Moreover, the enzyme can be easily obtained in large
amounts (25). When the two enzymes can be combined
in a single reaction mixture, one can design a one-pot
reactor to produce natural vanillin. Because the pH
optima of these two enzymatic reactions vary between
pH 8-9 for the carboxylesterase (17) and pH 10-10.5
for VAO, one can assume that the optimum pH condi-
tions for a one-pot system are between pH 9 and 10.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Maurice Franssen (Wageningen University)
for fruitful discussions and the gift of lipase B from
Candida antarctica and Marlou van Iersel (Wageningen
University) for the gift of rat liver microsomes. We also
thank Niek Bastiaensen and Rigoberto Gonzales for
technical assistance.
(23) Rietjens, I. M.; Vervoort, J . Xenobiotica 1989, 19, 1297-
1305.
(24) Gibson, T. G. Studies on the Epstein-Barr virus ge-
nome. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge,
Cambridge, U.K., 1984.
(25) Benen, J . A. E.; Sanchez-Torres, P.; Wagemaker, M. J .
M.; Fraaije, M. W.; van Berkel, W. J . H.; Visser, J . J .
Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 7865-7872.
LITERATURE CITED
(26) Fraaije, M. W.; van Berkel, W. J . H. J . Biol. Chem. 1997,
272, 18111-18116.
(27) Strickland, S.; Palmer, G.; Massey, V. J . Biol. Chem.
1975, 250, 4048-4052.
(28) Mattevi, A.; Fraaije, M. W.; Mozzarelli, A.; Olivi, L.;
Coda, A.; van Berkel, W. J . H. Struct. Fold. Des. 1997,
5, 907-920.
(1) Rao, S. R.; Ravishankar, G. A. J . Sci. Food Agric. 2000,
80, 289-304.
(2) Aruoma, O. I. Free Radical Res. 1999, 30, 419-427.
(3) Kamat, J . P.; Ghosh, A.; Devasagayam, T. P. Mol. Cell.
Biochem. 2000, 209, 47-53.
(4) Ranadive, A. S.; Krings, U.; Berger, R. G. J . Agric. Food
Chem. 1992, 40, 1922-1924.
(5) Prince, R. C.; Gunson, D. E. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1994,
19, 521.
(6) Lesage-Meessen, L.; Delattre, M.; Haon, M.; Thibault,
J .-F.; Colonna Ceccaldi, B.; Brunerie, P.; Asther, M. J .
Biotechnol. 1996, 50, 107-113.
Received for review J anuary 22, 2001. Revised manuscript
received April 4, 2001. Accepted April 5, 2001. This work was
performed within the framework of the Innovation Oriented
Research Program (IOP) Catalysis of the Dutch Ministry of
Economy Affairs (Project IKA 96005).
(7) Cheetham, P. S. J . Trends Biotechnol. 1993, 11, 478-
488.
(8) Hagedorn, S.; Kaphammer, B. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
1994, 48, 773-800.
J F010093J