tetrahydrocarbazole series, but this was accompanied by a slight
decrease in cell potency. N-Methylation (32, 33) gave very little
change in potency, although a significant drop in cell potency
was seen in the case of the acrylamide. Removal of the methyl at
C-2' (34 – 37) caused two-fold increase in enzyme potency, but a
two- to three-fold decrease in cell potency except in the case of
the vinyl sulfone 35. The loss of cell potency for 34, 36 and 37
relative to the methylated analogs may reflect poorer cell
penetration, perhaps due to decreased shielding of the polarity
and hydrogen-bonding ability of the amide moiety.
Selectivity for BTK over other kinases is summarized in Table
5 for three irreversible compounds (11, a tetrahydrocarbazole,
and two indoles, 27 and 31), along with the tetrahydrocarbazole
quinazolinone 10 for comparison. Selectivity over LCK, which is
involved in leukocyte function, is greatly increased for all three
compounds relative to 10, dramatically so for the indole vinyl
sulfone. Compound 10 is already very selective with respect to
JAK2, but this selectivity is greatly improved (5000- to 16,000-
fold) for the three irreversible compounds. ITK is also involved
in leukocyte function and, like BTK, is a member of the TEC
family. Despite also having a cysteine homologous to Cys481 in
the ATP binding site, selectivity over ITK is improved in the
irreversible compounds relative to that seen with 2, especially for
the indole acrylamide 27. Differences in selectivity are less
profound and more varied for the remaining TEC family kinases
(BMX, TEC and TXK). Selectivities for two other kinases
having homologous cysteines are also shown. Compound 10 was
already very selective for JAK3; the irreversible compounds were
still selective but less so. Against HER4, the acrylamides showed
good selectivity, while the vinyl sulfonamide was about 10-fold
less selective.
these molecules, particularly in the indole series, combines with
the increased potency (seen despite the loss of the tertiary
carbinol in 27 and 31) to give significant increases in ligand
efficiency.
Unfortunately, compared to the quinazolinone-based
reversible inhibitors, the dimethylindole acrylamides and vinyl
sulfones showed reduced metabolic stability on incubation with
microsomes from human and (especially) mouse hepatocytes.
Because of this, although in vivo studies were not performed on
the irreversible compounds described here, their pharmacokinetic
profiles are expected to be poor. It should be noted, though, that
irreversible inhibitors are expected to require less prolonged and
elevated plasma levels than reversible inhibitors, since any
inhibitor bound to BTK would equilibrate only very slowly, if at
all, with plasma, leading to a favorable disconnect between
pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Further SAR, as well
as study and optimization of the ADME properties and efficacy
of this new class of inhibitors, will be reported elsewhere.
Table 6. Physicochemical properties and metabolic stability for
three irreversible BTK inhibitors compared to reversible inhibitor
10
Property
MWa
10
506.60
38
11
431.53
32
27
347.42
26
31
383.47
27
HACb
HBD/Ac
PSAd
3/4
4/3
3/2
3/3
111.78
4.61
0.19
84
108.21
3.91
0.29
90
87.98
3.76
0.35
71
105.05
2.85
0.36
71
clogPe
LEf
hLMg
mLMg
86
100
1.6
12
amolecular weight. bheavy atom count. cH-bond donors/acceptors.
dPolar surface area. eCalculated log P. fLigand efficiency.
GPercent remaining after 15 min incubation with human or mouse
liver microsomes.
Table 5. Kinase selectivity for three irreversible BTK inhibitors
compared to reversible inhibitor 10a,b
10
11
27
31
(THC,
reversible)
(THC,
(indole,
(indole,
Kinase
BTK
irreversible) irreversible) irreversible)
9.3
0.21
0.38
0.14
LCK
910
(98)
5700
(610)
290
(31)
200
(22)
56
420
>2000
(>5300)
>2000
(>5300)
88
(230)
13
(34)
>2000
(>14000)
1100
(7900)
8.3
(59)
3.3
(24)
0.9
(2000)
3300
(16,000)
23
(110)
5.2
JAK2
ITK
BMX
TEC
(25)
2.3
6.4
(6.0)
nt
(11)
15
(71)
41
(200)
150
(17)
26
(68)
28
(74)
240
(6.4)
2.3
(16)
11
(79)
10
TXK
JAK3
HER4
15,000
(1600)
nt
(710)
(630)
(71)
a
IC50 (nM). Numbers in parentheses are selectivities for BTK
over the indicated kinase. nt
b
=
not tested.
THC =
tetrahydrocarbazole
Some physicochemical properties for the same four
compounds are compared in Table 6. As mentioned previously,
replacement of the quinazolinone of 10 with the acrylamide of 11
decreases molecular weight, heavy atom count, polar surface area
and calculated log P, clearly improving these parameters of
“drug-likeness”.10 The trend obviously continues in moving from
11 to the dimethylindole 27, along with further improvement in
hydrogen bond donor/acceptor count and polar surface area
through removal of the tertiary carbinol. The smaller sizes of
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) bis-pinacol diborane, KOAc,
PdCl2(dppf)2, dioxane, 110 oC, 16 h (50-70%). (ii) Pd(PPh3)4, R4Br,
Na2CO3 or K2CO3, toluene/EtOH, 90 °C, 16
h (19-65%). (iii)
ClC(=O)C(R)=C(R2)R1 or ClSO2CH2CH2Cl, Hünig’s base, CH2Cl2, rt,
16 h (17-94%). (iv) -78 °C to rt, THF, 4 h (37-45%). (v) SEM-Cl, NaH,
THF, 0 °C to rt, 3 h (82-95% crude). (vi) n-BuLi, THF, -78 °C, 10 min;
then CO2, -78 °C to rt, 4 h (93-95% crude). (vii) NH4OH, HOBT, EDC,
THF/DCM, rt, 16 h (36-83%). (viii) TBAF, ethylenediamine, THF, 50
°C, 1-3 days (49-74%). (ix) HOAc, 110 °C, 16 h (50-80%).