A. Xie et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 717 (2017) 226e231
227
to explore the system in the basic solutions by employment of
different SED components. Triethanolamine (TEOA) and triethyl-
amine (TEA) are two kinds of SEDs that have been previously uti-
lized in the basic solutions for the photocatalytic water reduction
systems [2]. We evaluated the use of these two SEDs, and the ki-
netic traces in Fig. 1a show the aliphatic amine TEA gives a two-fold
increase in total hydrogen production compared to TEOA. Thus, all
subsequent studies were conducted using TEA as the SED. It should
be noteworthy that when employing TEA as the SED, the net re-
action being driven photochemically can be expressed by the
equation (Eq. 1: NEt3 þ H2O / H2 þ HNEt2 þ CH3CHO). Thermo-
chemical data indicate that the overall reaction is a thermody-
namically unfavorable reaction and must be driven by light energy
[8].
[10]. The amount of H2 only produced from [RuII(bpy)3]Cl2, which
cannot be neglected, was subtracted from the total H2 produced, to
calculate the corrected TON.
An induction period with no detectable H2 evolution in the first
half an hour from the reaction profile is observed. Generally, the
appearance of induction phase may be ascribed to the formation of
CoI species or cobalt colloids produced from the photodecomposi-
tion of molecular Co catalysts. Consequently, mercury-poisoning
experiments are carried out to determine if colloidal cobalt is
possibly formed and responsible the activity of H2 evolution. The
addition of a large excess of mercury has no significant effect on the
catalytic activity of [CoIIPc(-2)] (Fig. S2, in the Supporting Infor-
mation), excluding the formation of metal colloids during the
photocatalytic reaction. Experiments with D2O in place of water
while keeping other conditions identical are conducted. The large
deuterium incorporation into the gaseous hydrogen products pro-
vides strong evidence that the only hydrogen source in the pro-
duced hydrogen gas is water (Fig. S3, in the Supporting
Information).
The influence of solvents on the H2-evolving reaction was
explored with the system of [CoIIPc(-2)] (2 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 M), [RuII(bpy)3]
Cl2 (2 ꢁ 10ꢀ4 M) and TEA (0.36 M) at pH 9.0 within 10 h of visible-
light irradiation (l > 420 nm). It is well known that solvents have an
apparent influence on the photoinduced H2 production [6,9]. As
shown in Fig. 1b, when the mixture of CH3CH2OH/H2O (4:1, v/v)
was used as solvent, more than 300 mmol H2 was produced, cor-
To investigate the catalytic activity of the complex [CoIIPc(-2)],
we studied the effect of the relative concentration of [CoIIPc(-2)]
and [RuII(bpy)3]Cl2 on the H2 production. The catalyst is most active
at low concentrations, and hydrogen evolution is observed using
[CoIIPc(-2)] as low as 2 ꢁ 10ꢀ6 M. Fig. 2a shows the effect of varying
catalyst concentration on the rate and overall yield of hydrogen
generation under continuous irradiation. Increasing the concen-
tration of [CoIIPc(-2)] increases the overall rate of H2 generation and
the total amount of hydrogen evolved for the system. The initial
rates for hydrogen evolution are obtained from the linear portion of
each curve and indicate a first order dependence on catalyst con-
centration for this system. When the catalyst concentration is fixed
at 2 ꢁ 10ꢀ6 M and the PS [RuII(bpy)3]Cl2 concentration increases
from 2 ꢁ 10ꢀ4 to 6 ꢁ 10ꢀ4 M, TONcat between 1300 and 2400 are
obtained, corresponding to a TOFcat of 310 and 680 hꢀ1, respectively
(Fig. 2b). The apparent quantum efficiency of the H2-evolving sys-
tem at 420 nm can be calculated to be 4.20% [11]. In the previous
report, porphyrin cobalt was used as molecular photocatalyst to
reduce protons into H2 in the presence of [RuII(bpy)3]Cl2
(bpy ¼ 2,20-bipyridine) as the PS and ascorbic acid (AA) as the SED.
Though the system achieves TON (versus the catalyst) up to 725,
the catalytic activity quickly decomposes after only 2 h of irradia-
tion [4]. For comparison, the longevity of the hydrogen-generating
system with the complex phthalycyanine cobalt can be increased.
Furthermore, re-addition of the same quantity of fresh HEC
responding to 150 TON with respect to the catalyst. In contrast, 130
and 80 TON were obtained, respectively, in the mixed solvents of
CH3OH/H2O (4:1) and CH3CN/H2O (4:1), while DMF/H2O (4:1) or
THF/H2O (4:1) resulted in no hydrogen production. The solvent
dependence for hydrogen production probably may be ascribed to
many factors including solvent polarity, stabilization of reduction
intermediates and Co(II/I) reduction potential necessary for
hydrogen generation [6a,9].
The pH value significantly affected the interaction of PS and HEC,
the state of PS and TEA, and the subsequent driving force for
photocatalytic H2 evolution in the photocatalytic system. The
[RuII(bpy)3]Cl2/[CoIIPc(-2)]/TEA photocatalytic system functioned
between pH 8.0 and pH 11.0, with a maximum catalytic activity at
pH 10.0 (Fig. S1, in the Supporting Information). It sharply
decreased in a more acidic or more basic medium. The great
decrease in TONs at lower pH values was probably because of the
protonation of TEA, which resulted in poor electron-donating
ability. In higher pH values, the decreased concentrations of pro-
ton will lead to a deceleration of efficiency of photogenerated
hydrogen. Control experiments showed that the absence of PS or
TEA led to no significant H2 production. However, weak H2 pro-
duction was observed from solutions containing only the PS
[RuII(bpy)3]Cl2, which is in agreement with previous observations
Scheme 1. Photocatalytic H2-production system using [CoIIPc(-2)] as HEC, [RuII(bpy)3]Cl2 as PS and TEA as SED.