HJ. Zhang et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 516 (2012) 91–95
95
Table 1
BET surface area and H2 evolution of Ca1−2xAgxLaxTiO3.
Type of catalyst
Surface area
Activity
(m2 g−1
)
(mol h−1 gcat−1
)
H2/UV
H2/vis
CaTiO3
9.64
10.61
11.39
12.17
11.44
325.4
549.6
1053.8
1064.2
436.9
0.0
2.6
2.9
10.1
4.1
Ca0.98Ag0.01La0.01TiO3
Ca0.96Ag0.02La0.02TiO3
Ca0.94Ag0.03La0.03TiO3
Ca0.92Ag0.04La0.04TiO3
the O 2p states illuminating the covalent property of the Ti–O
in the O 2p valence band, which demonstrates ionic interaction
between Ca and TiO6. It is noted that the bandwidth of O 2p states
in the upper valence band is about 4.25 eV. After the introduction of
substitutional Ag for Ca (Fig. 6b), some Ag 5s partially occupied
states are introduced above the valence band and overlap with O
2p states with the O 2p valence band expanded to be about 4.85 eV,
which results in the band gap narrowing. Fig. 6c shows that the
introduction of a La atom results in the O 2p valence band suffering
a further expansion to be about 5.12 eV, whereas La related states
have few contributions neither to the valence band nor to the con-
duction band due to the ionic interaction between La and TiO6. In
this situation, partially occupied Ag 5s states are present as totally
occupied. To keep charge balance, this Ag atom requires one more
electron from the CaTiO3 lattice than a Ca atom does, so the Ag may
act as a single acceptor. Meanwhile, the La atom releases one more
electron than a Ca atom to the CaTiO3 lattice and may act as sin-
gle donor. Spontaneously, the extra electron brought by La dopant
pairs up with the unpaired Ag 5 s electron in CaTiO3 lattice, namely,
the electron on the donor level passivates the same amount of hole
on the acceptor level, so that, this codoped system can still be of
semiconductor character. Neither acceptor levels nor donor levels
appearing within the band gap also confirm that the charge bal-
ance is maintained owing to the codoping of Ag and La, and thus
the photocatalytic activity under visible light can be improved to
an extensive degree. The charge compensation process, Ti3+ (d1)
change into Ti4+ (d0) and partially occupied Ag 5s states change into
completely occupied, indicates a stabilizing effect. Subsequently, it
can be deduced that there presents a donor-acceptor pair (DAP)
recombination [19] in the Ag–La codoped CaTiO3, in which both
rowed band gap and the recombination center of photogenerated
carriers is suppressed. So the Ag–La codoped CaTiO3 system pos-
sesses high photostability and high photocatalytic activity under
visible light like reported in Refs. [9] and [10].
rate will be increased with the average distance between capture
traps is shorter, at the same time, because the solubility of doped
ions in the CaTiO3 is limited, the higher doped concentration can
lead to enrichment of doped ions on the surface of catalyst, which
makes the photocatalytic activity reduce. Photocatalytic activities
of Ag–La codoped CaTiO3 powder for hydrogen evolution under UV
and visible light are increased dramatically than that of pure CaTiO3
powder.
4. Conclusions
CaTiO3 codoped with Ag–La, prepared by sol–gel method cou-
pled with ultrasonic technique, was shown to be an effective
photocatalyst for water splitting. Theoretical calculations and
experimental studies have demonstrated that increase of photocat-
alytic activities both under UV and visible light are caused by the
Ag–La codoping. Neither acceptor levels nor donor levels appear-
ing within the band gap also confirm that the charge balance is
maintained owing to the codoping of Ag and La, and thus the photo-
catalytic activity under visible light can be improved to an extensive
degree.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foun-
dation of China (20871036, 21071036), Natural Science Foundation
of Heilongjiang Province (ZD201011), and China Postdoctoral Sci-
ence Foundation (20100480982).
References
[1] A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature 238 (1972) 37–38.
[2] M.Y. Guo, M.K. Fung, F. Fang, X.Y. Chen, A.M.C. Ng, A.B. Djurisˇic, W.K. Chan, J.
Alloys Compd. 509 (2011) 1328–1332.
[3] J.X. Sun, G. Chen, Y.X. Li, C. Zhou, H.J. Zhang, J. Alloys Compd. 509 (2011)
1133–1137.
[4] G.K. Zhang, J. Gong, H.H. Gan, F. Lü, J.Alloys Compd. 509 (2011) 9791–9797.
[5] L.S. Ji, J.J. Li, W.P. Fang, J. Alloys Compd. 489 (2010) L13–L16.
[6] G.Q. Wang, W. Lan, G.J. Han, Y. Wang, Q. Su, X.Q. Liu, J. Alloys Compd. 509 (2011)
[7] L.C. Ji, C.C. Wu, S. Han, N. Yao, Y.Y. Li, Z.B. Li, B. Chi, J. Pu, J. Li, J. Alloys Compd.
509 (2011) 6067–6071.
3.5. Photocatalytic activity for water splitting
[8] X. Liu, Z.Q. Liu, J. Zheng, X. Yan, D.D. Li, S. Chen, W. Chu, J. Alloys Compd. 509
(2011) 9970–9976.
[9] T. Puangpetch, T. Sreethawong, S. Chavadej, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010)
6531–6540.
[10] W.J. Dong, X.Y. Li, J. Yu, W.C. Guo, B.J. Li, L. Tan, C.R. Li, J.J. Shi, G. Wang, Mater.
Lett. 67 (2012) 131–134.
[11] T. Puangtch, P. Sommakettarin, S. Chavadej, T. Sreethawong, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 35 (2010) 12428–12442.
[12] H.J. Zhang, G. Chen, Y.X. Li, Y.J. Teng, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010)
2713–2716.
[13] K.A. Shimura, H. Miyanaga, H. Yoshid, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 175 (2010) 85–92.
[14] Y.X. Li, G. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Wang, A.K. Zhou, Z.Y. Shen, Adv. Funct. Mater. 20
(2010) 3390–3398.
[15] O. Jepsen, O.K. Andersen, A.R. Mackintosh, Phys. Rev. B 13 (1975) 3060–3083.
[16] J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865–3868.
[17] P. Hohenberg, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) B864–B871.
[18] A. Shluger, V. Stefanovich, Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 9664–9673.
[19] W. Wei, Y. Dai, M. Guo, L. Yu, B.B. Huang, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009)
15046–15050.
The specific surface area (BET) and dependence of the photocat-
alytic activity of un-doped CaTiO3 and Ag–La codoped CaTiO3 under
UV light and visible light on the doping amount are listed in Table 1.
It can be seen from the table that the specific surface areas raise
monotonously with the continuous increments of codoped Ag–La
amounts, which agrees with the SEM results. The photocatalytic
activity increased with increasing doping amount to a maximum
at 3 mol%, above which the activity dropped gradually. It is well
known that the concentration of the doped ions exists an opti-
mal value. When the doped concentration is lower than optimal
doped concentration, there are not enough capture traps of charge
carriers in the semiconductor, so photocatalytic activity increased
with increasing of doped concentration; When the doped concen-
tration is higher than optimal doped concentration, recombination