New Insights into ETS-10 and Titanate Quantum Wire
A R T I C L E S
2-
Chart 1. (A) Illustration of 3D Networks of Titanate (TiO3
Quantum Wires (red) and SiO2 Channels (gray) in a
)
Scheme 1
Truncated-Bipyramidal ETS-10 crystal with Polymorph B and (B,
C) Single Titanate Quantum Wires Charge-Balanced with (B)
Hydrated and (C) Naked Cations
balancing cations to compensate for the negative charges of the
titanate quantum wires. In the related aluminosilicate zeolites,
the (negative) charge density of the framework23 has often been
represented by the binding energy of an O 1s electron,24 despite
the fact that it is a core electron. However, the Sanderson partial
(negative) charge of the framework oxygen, -δ(Of), has often
been used instead of the O 1s binding energy because the
binding energy of an O 1s electron cannot be routinely obtained
and it has been established that the two values [the O 1s binding
energy and -δ(Of)] are linearly correlated.24,25
The negative charge density of the framework can be
conveniently tuned by varying both the type of charge-balancing
cation and the degree of dehydration of the zeolite because the
framework oxygen atoms interact with the cations through a
ligand-to-metal charge-transfer (LMCT) interaction (Scheme 1)
and the degree of the LMCT interaction increases as the degree
of dehydration increases.25,26
Thus, in a dry zeolite, the framework charge density decreases
as the acceptor strength or the electronegativity of the charge-
balancing cation increases and also as the degree of dehydration
increases, since dehydration of the zeolite leads to the removal
of water shells from the cations, thereby increasing the degree
of direct LMCT from the framework to the cation in the ground
state.
Among the known quantum wires,18,19 the TiO3 quantum
2-
wire is an anionic counterpart of anatase nanowire18 and can
be regarded as a one-dimensional (1D) extreme of three-
dimensional (3D) bulk titanates, which are widely used in
industry as capacitors, etc.20 Therefore, acquiring the properties
of the TiO3 quantum wire also means acquiring the 1D-
extreme properties of titanates. Each TiO3 quantum wire is
surrounded by insulating nanoporous silica with a pore size of
8 Å × 5 Å, and the wires are supramolecularly organized within
the crystalline solid from its birth. It exhibits the quantum
confinement effect along the chain direction even at length scales
longer than 50 nm.12 The estimated reduced mass of an exciton
along its chain direction (µz, 0.0006me)12 is much smaller than
those of InSb (0.014me)21 and single-walled carbon nanotubes
(SW-CNTs, 0.019me).22 Such an unusually small µz further
2-
2-
Normally, a mixture of Na+ and K+ exists within the pristine
ETS-10 crystals for charge neutralization. It has been believed
that the charge-balancing cations are evenly distributed along
the quantum wire in the vicinity of each titanium center (Chart
1B).27 They can be exchanged with other cations through ion
exchange in aqueous solution.7,9,15,28-30 In the hydrated state,
the cations are also expected to be at least partially surrounded
by water molecules, as illustrated in Chart 1B. In the dehydrated
state, however, they should be directly coordinated by the
framework oxygen atoms, as illustrated in Chart 1C. Accord-
2-
suggests the possibility that the carrier mobility along the TiO3
molecular wire, despite the wire’s oxide nature, can be much
greater than that in single-walled carbon nanotubes, indicating
the possibility that the quantum wire is metallic.
The unit cell composition of ETS-10 is Mn+(2/n)Ti1Si5O13.
Thus, like aluminosilicate zeolites, ETS-10 also carries charge-
(13) (a) Borello, E.; Lamberti, C.; Bordiga, S.; Zecchina, A.; Area´n, C. O.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 71, 2319–2321. (b) Llabre´s i Xamena, F. X.;
Damin, A.; Bordiga, S.; Zecchina, A. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1514–
1515. (c) Damin, A.; Llabre´s i Xamena, F. X.; Lamberti, C.; Civalleri,
B.; Zicovich-Wilson, C. M.; Zecchina, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004,
108, 1328–1336. (d) Bordiga, S.; Palomino, G. T.; Zecchina, A.;
Ranghino, G.; Giamello, E.; Lamberti, C. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112,
3859–3867.
(23) It is more often called the framework electron donor strength or
framework basicity. These terms eventually represent the richness of
the electron density in the framework. Among these, the terms electron
donor strength and framework basicity should rather be used when
one deals with the interaction between the framework and its
counterparts such as electron acceptors and acids. Therefore, in this
work, we use negative framework charge density to represent the
richness of electron density.
(14) Zimmerman, A. M.; Doren, D. J.; Lobo, R. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006,
110, 8959–8964.
(24) Huang, H.; Adnot, A.; Kaliaguine, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
10005–10010.
(15) Lamberti, C. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 1999, 30, 155–163.
(16) Wang, X.; Jacobson, A. J. Chem. Commun. 1999, 973–974.
(17) Yilmaz, B.; Warzywoda, J.; Sacco, A., Jr. Nanotechnology 2006, 17,
4092–4099.
(25) (a) Mortier, W. J.; Schoonheydt, R. A. Prog. Solid State Chem. 1985,
16, 1–125. (b) Heidler, R.; Janssens, G. O. A.; Mortier, W. J.;
Schoonheydt, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 19728–19734. (c)
Genechten, K. A. V.; Mortier, W. J. Zeolites 1988, 8, 273–283.
(26) (a) Yoon, K. B. In Handbook of Zeolite Science and Technology;
Auerbach, S. M., Carrado, K. A., Dutta, P. K., Eds.; Marcel Dekker:
New York, 2003; Chapter 13. (b) Park, Y. S.; Um, S. Y.; Yoon, K. B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3193–3200. (c) Choi, S. Y.; Park, Y. S.;
Hong, S. B.; Yoon, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9377–9386.
(27) (a) Anderson, M. W.; Agger, J. R.; Luigi, D.-P.; Baggaley, A. K.;
Rocha, J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999, 1, 2287–2282. (b) Grillo,
M. E.; Carrazza, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 12261–12264.
(28) Krisnandi, Y. K.; Lachowski, E. E.; Howe, R. F. Chem. Mater. 2006,
18, 928–933.
(18) (a) Liu, C.; Yang, S. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1025–1031. (b) Venkataraman,
L.; Lieber, C. M. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1999, 83, 5334–5337. (c) Huang,
Y.; Duan, X.; Cui, Y.; Lauhon, L. J.; Kim, K.-H.; Lieber, C. M. Science
2001, 294, 1313–1317. (d) Duan, X.; Huang, Y.; Cui, Y.; Wang, J.;
Lieber, C. M. Nature 2001, 409, 66–69.
(19) (a) Xia, Y.; Yang, P.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Mayers, B.; Gates, B.; Yin,
Y.; Kim, F.; Yan, H. AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 353–389. (b) Golden,
J. H.; DiSalvo, F. J.; Fre´chet, J. M. J.; Silcox, J.; Thomas, M.; Elman,
J. Science 1996, 273, 782–784. (c) Yu, H.; Li, J.; Loomis, R. A.; Wang,
L.-W.; Buhro, W. E. Nat. Mater. 2003, 2, 517–520.
(20) Bavykin, D. V.; Friedrich, J. M.; Walsh, F. C. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18,
2807–2824.
(29) Waghmode, S. B.; Vetrivel, R.; Hegde, S. G.; Gopinath, C. S.;
Sivasanker, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 8517–8523.
(21) Burs, L. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 4403–4409.
(22) Pedersen, T. G. Phys. ReV. B 2003, 67, 073401.
(30) Pavel, C. C.; Zibrowius, B.; Lo¨ffler, E.; Schmidt, W. Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 3440–3446.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 36, 2009 13081