FULL PAPERS
step to 160 mM NaOH. The total amount of the expected
thioglycoside product was determined by using a calibration
curve with three different amounts (0.53, 1.06 and 2.12 nmol
of a-GlcNAc-S-CH2CO2Me and 0.25, 0.75 and 1.5 nmol of
a-GlcNAc-S-CH2CO2Et, respectively) of the product, and
cellobiose (0.73 nmol) as internal standard. The authentic
compounds used to obtain the calibration curves were ob-
tained by preparative scale biocatalysis as outlined below.
The synthetic efficiency of the mutants was determined as-
suming the amount of GlcNAc available in 2NP-a-GlcNAc
as 100%. All the samples were analysed in duplicate.
formed at 0.28Cminꢀ1 and the SYPRO Orange fluorescence
was normalised to maximum fluorescence value within each
scan to obtain relative fluorescence. All the measurements
were performed in triplicate. The Tm value represents the
flection point of the transition curve, as described by the
Boltzmann equation.[28]
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the project “Esobiologia e ambi-
enti estremi: dalla Chimica delle Molecole alla Biologia degli
Estremofili – ECMB” n. 2014-026-R.0 of the Italian Space
Agency. N.T.M., E.S., and M.M. were supported by an Exec-
utive programme of scientific and technological co-operation
between the Italian Republic and the Republic of South
Africa for the years 2011–2013, entitled: “Novel a-glycosyn-
thases for the preparation of Mycothiol analogues as poten-
tial antituberculosis agents”, funded by the Directorate for
Cultural Promotion and Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, Italy and the National Research Foundation of South
Africa.
Preparative Scale Biocatalysis
Preparative scale a-TGL reactions were carried out in
15 mL of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0). 2NP-
a-GlcNAc (0.026 g, 0.076 mmol) was added as the donor,
followed by addition of thiol (20 equiv.) or 100 mM sodium
azide as the acceptor. DTT (0.160 mM, 0.370 mg,
0.0024 mmol,) was added as reducing agent to prevent disul-
phide bond formation in the case of the thiol acceptors. The
reaction was initiated by addition of the thioglycoligase cat-
alyst (1.33 mM of either CpGH89–E483A or CpGH89–
E483S) to the reaction mixture followed by incubation at
378C. Reaction progress was monitored and analysed by
TLC (EtOAc/MeOH/H2O; 70:20:10 v/v). Upon completion
(usually after overnight incubation), the reaction was fil-
tered through a syringe filter (13 mm GHP Acrodiscꢄ filter
with 0.2 mm GHP membrane) to remove the protein. The fil-
tered mixture was loaded onto an SPE column (Phenomen-
ex Strata C18-U, 55 mm, 70 A, 10 g/60 mL) and the crude
product was eluted with methanol. The fractions with the
crude product were pooled together and concentrated by
rotary evaporation. In the case of reactions with acceptors
that do not proceed close to completion (as in the case of
thiophenol), the crude product was treated with wild-type
CpGH89 for 72 h under standard conditions to hydrolyse
any residual donor that may be present. The enzyme was
subsequently removed as described above. The crude prod-
uct was purified by flash column chromatography on silica
(EtOAc/MeOH/H2O; 70:20:10 v/v). Any residual nitrophe-
nol was removed by passing the purified product through
Phenomenex Strataꢄ Phenyl (55mm 70 ꢅ) SPE column, elut-
ing with water. The final purified products were obtained
following by freeze drying for three days to remove any
References
[1] a) H. C. Dorfmueller, D. M. F. van Aalten, FEBS Lett.
2010, 584, 694–700; b) G. J. Davies, S. J. Williams, Bio-
chem. Soc. Trans. 2016, 44, 79–87.
[2] S. R. Joshi, E. Standl, N. Tong, P. Shah, S. Kalra, R.
Rathod, Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2015, 16, 1959–
1981.
[3] G. Parenti, M. Moracci, S. Fecarotta, G. Andria, Future
Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 1031–1045.
[4] G. Yogalingam, J. J. Hopwood, Hum. Mutat. 2001, 18,
264–281.
[5] G. Parenti, EMBO Mol. Med. 2009, 1, 268–279.
[6] E. Ficko-Blean, K. A. Stubbs, O. Nemirovsky, D. J. Vo-
cadlo, A. B. Boraston, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008,
105, 6560–6565.
[7] a) L. F. Mackenzie, Q. P. Wang, R. A. J. Warren, S. G.
Withers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5583–5584; b) M.
Moracci, A. Trincone, G. Perugino, M. Ciaramella, M.
Rossi, Biochemistry 1998, 37, 17262–17270; c) C. Malet,
A. Planas, FEBS Lett. 1998, 440, 208–212.
[8] a) B. Cobucci-Ponzano, F. Conte, E. Bedini, M. M. Cor-
saro, M. Parrilli, G. Sulzenbacher, A. Lipski, F. Dal
Piaz, L. Lepore, M. Rossi, M. Moracci, Chem. Biol.
2009, 16, 1097–1108; b) I. Park, H. Lee, J. Cha, Biotech-
nol. Lett. 2014, 36, 789–796.
water, and were fully characterised by H NMR, 13C NMR
and MS-ESI or HR-MS (see the Supporting Information for
data).
1
CpGH98 Wild Type Inhibition assay and Thermal
Stability
The inhibitory effects of the different compounds (0.6 mM
each) were assayed by measuring the specific activity of
CpGH89 wild type on 2NP-a-GlcNAc in 100 mM phosphate
buffer (pH 7.3) at 378C as reported above. Thermal stability
of CpGH89 wild type was measured by DSF as previously
reported[23] with some modifications. Briefly, CpGH89 wild
type (2.5 mg) was incubated in citrate phosphate buffer and
SYPRO Orange dye 5X, in a total volume of 25 mL in the
presence of the different compounds under test. Samples
were heated from 25 to 948C in a Real-Time Light Cycler
(Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy). Thermal stability scans were per-
[9] a) B. Cobucci-Ponzano, C. Zorzetti, A. Strazzulli, S. Ca-
rillo, E. Bedini, M. M. Corsaro, D. A. Comfort, R. M.
Kelly, M. Rossi, M. Moracci, Glycobiology 2011, 21,
448–456; b) Z. Armstrong, S. G. Withers, Biopolymers
2013, 99, 666–674.
[10] M. Jahn, J. Marles, R. A. J. Warren, S. G. Withers,
Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 366; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 352.
[11] K. Slamova, J. Krejzova, P. Marhol, L. Kalachova, N.
Kulik, H. Pelantova, J. Cvacka, V. Kren, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2015, 357, 1941–1950.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 0000, 000, 0 – 0
13
ꢀ 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!