C. Bolm et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1795–1798
Table 2. Enantioselective phenyl transfer using recycled ferrocene 13a
1797
Acknowledgements
Entry
Substrate
Cycle
Yield (%)
eeb (%)
We are grateful to the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
and to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
within the Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 380
‘Asymmetric Synthesis by Chemical and Biological
Methods’ for financial support.
1
2
3
4
5
4-Cl–C6H4–CHO
4-Cl–C6H4–CHO
4-Cl–C6H4–CHO
4-Cl–C6H4–CHO
4-Cl–C6H4–CHO
1
2
3
4
5
8097
75
81
97
96
95
95
8095
aReactions were carried out with 10mol% of catalyst in toluene at
10 ꢀC.
bDetermined by HPLC using a chiral stationary phase.
References and Notes
1. (a) For examples see: Meguro, K.; Aizawa, M.; Sohda, T.;
Kawamatsu, Y.; Nagaoka, A. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985, 33,
3787. (b) Toda, F.; Tanaka, K.; Koshiro, K. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1991, 2, 873. (c) Botta, M.; Summa, V.; Corelli, F.;
Di Pietro, G.; Lombardi, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7,
1263. (d) Stanchev, S.; Rakovska, R.; Berova, N.; Snatzke, G.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 183.
the catalytic system. However, compared to the result
obtained in a catalysis with low-molecular ferrocenyl
oxazoline 4, the enantioselectivity in the run with 11 was
significantly lower (Table 1, entry 2).12
2. (a) Bolm, C.; Muniz, K. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1295. (b)
Bolm, C.; Hermanns, N.; Hildebrand, J. P.; Muniz, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3465. (c) Bolm, C.; Kesselgruber, M.;
Hermanns, N.; Hildebrand, J. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
39, 1488. (d) Bolm, C.; Kesselgruber, M.; Grenz, A.; Her-
manns, N.; Hildebrand, J. P. New J. Chem. 2001, 25, 13. (e)
Bolm, C.; Hermanns, N.; Kesselgruber, M.; Hildebrand, J. P.
J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 624, 157. (f) For a recent review on
catalyzed asymmetric arylation reactions: Bolm, C.; Hildeb-
rand, J. P.; Muniz, K.; Hermanns, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 3284.
3. (a) For other catalyzed phenyl zinc additions to aldehydes,
see: Dosa, P. I.; Ruble, J. C.; Fu, G. C. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 444. (b) Huang, W.-S.; Hu, Q.-S.; Pu, L. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 7940. (c) Huang, W.-S.; Pu, L. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 145 and references therein..
When the MeO-PEG-supported ferrocene 13 was
employed in the title reaction an excellent enantio-
selectivity was observed. The addition product of the
phenylzinc reagent onto p-chloro-benzaldehyde was
obtained in quantitative yields and with 97% ee (Table
1, entry 3). It is noteworthy, that this result is identical
to the one obtained with low-molecular ferrocenyl oxa-
zoline 4. Furthermore, for this remarkably high
enantioselectivity neither an increase of catalyst loading
nor a slow substrate addition was required.
Unfortunately, in the case of the diethylzinc addition to
benzaldehyde, a catalysis with the immobilized ligand
13 did not reach the enantioselectivity achieved with
ferrocenyl oxazoline 4. Here, the addition product was
only obtained with 86% ee.
4. (a) DeVos, D. E., Vankelecom, I. F. J., Jacobs, P. A., Eds.
Chiral Catalyst Immobilization and Recycling; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2000. (b) Clapham, B.; Reger, T. S.; Janda, K. D.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 4637. (c) Brase, S.; Dahmen, S. Syn-
thesis 2001, 1431.
¨
In order to gain insight into the recyclability of the
MeO-PEG-bound ferrocene 13, studies on the recovery
and reuse were performed (Table 2). To our delight, we
found that the excellent enantioselectivity was retained
throughout successive addition reactions. Even after
consecutive use of 13 in five catalytic cycles, the product
from the phenyl transfer to p-chlorobenzaldehyde was
obtained with an excellent ee of 95%. Furthermore it
should be noted that both the reaction protocol as well
as the separation and recycling of the catalyst were
simple and efficient.13
5. Pu, L.; Yu, H.-B. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 757 and references
cited therein..
6. (a) For reviews on soluble polymer-supported catalysts, see:
Wentworth, H. P., Jr; Janda, K. D. Chem. Commun. 1999,
1917. (b) Pu, L. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2227. (c) Bergbreiter,
D. E. Catal. Today 1998, 42, 389. (d) Bolm, C.; Gerlach, A.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 21.
7. (a) For the use of other supported ferrocenes in asymmetric
catalysis, see: Kollner, C.; Pugin, B.; Togni, A. J. Am. Chem.
¨
Soc. 1998, 120, 10274. (b) Blaser, H.-U.; Spindler, F.; Jacob-
sen, E. N.; Pfaltz, A.; Yamamoto, H. Comprehensive Asym-
metric Catalysis, Vol. 3; Springer: Berlin, 1999; p 1427. (c)
Pugin, B. Chimia 2001, 55, 719. (d) Gotov, B.; Toma, S.;
Macquarrie, D. J. New J. Chem. 2000, 24, 597. (e) Johnson,
B. F. G.; Raynor, S. A.; Shephard, D. S.; Mashmeyer, T.;
Thomas, J. M.; Sankar, G.; Bromley, S.; Oldroyd, R.; Glad-
den, L.; Mantle, M. D. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1167.
In conclusion, we have reported the syntheses of
new polymer-supported ferrocenes and their use in
asymmetric C–C-bond formation by phenyl-to-aldehyde
addition reactions. The results from the enantioselective
catalysis demonstrate that the soluble MeO-PEG-bound
ferrocene 13 exhibits excellent catalytic activity and
enantioselectivity. Furthermore, 13 can easily be recov-
ered and reused in successive catalytic additions,
maintaining excellent enantioselectivity even after five
cycles. To the best of our knowledge, this is the
first example of a MeO-PEG-supported ligand in the
asymmetric addition of organozinc reagents to alde-
hydes. We have thus devised a suitable way to generate
chiral arylphenylmethanols in an asymmetric catalytic
fashion.
8. (a) Sammakia, T.; Latham, H. A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
1629. (b) Wright, M. E. Organometallics 1990, 9, 853.
1
9. Selected analytical data. 5: H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d
0.89–0.96 (m, 9H), 0.99–1.08 (m, 6H), 1.28–1.42 (m, 6H),
1.48–1.60(m, 6H), 4.09 (s, 2H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 4.51 (s, 2H), 4.72
(s, 2H), 9.95 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) d 10.22,
13.70, 27.34, 29.13, 69.45, 71.35, 72.10, 73.12, 75.92, 79.20,
1
193.24. 6: H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d 0.04 (s, 3H), 0.05 (s,
3H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.99–1.05 (m, 6H), 1.26–1.42
(m, 10H), 1.44–1.62 (m, 10H), 3.39 (t, J=6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.58 (t,
J=6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.96 (t, J=1.7 Hz, 2H), 4.06 (t, J=1.7 Hz,
2H), 4.17 (t, J=1.7 Hz, 2H), 4.25 (s, 2H), 4.28 (t, J=1.7 Hz,