Mendeleev Commun., 2016, 26, 405–406
F– anion and the activator of CL according to the mechanism of
nonradiative energy transfer from electron-excited atomic *Xe.
2
2
1
1
.5
.0
.5
.0
.5
2
+
We found that Xe (460 nm), *UO (520 nm) and singlet oxygen
1
2
1
dimole ( O ) are responsible for CL in the solid-phase interac-
2
2
tion of XeF with UO HPO ·4H O.
2
2
4
2
The experiments were performed on the equipment of the
Khimiya’ Centre of Collective Use at the Ufa Institute of Chemistry
‘
0
0
2
of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
3
.0
4
50
500
550
600
650
References
l/nm
1
V. P. Kazakov, Khemilyuminestsentsiya uranila, lantanoidov i d-elementov
Chemiluminescence of Uranyl, Lanthanides and d-Elements), Nauka,
(
Figure 2 FL spectra of polycrystalline powders: (1) UO HPO ·4H O;
2) reaction product of XeF with UO HPO ·4H O; and (3) UO F ·2.5H O
lex = 450 nm, 298 K).
2
4
2
Moscow, 1980 (in Russian).
(
(
2 2 4 2 2 2 2
2
3
Chemiluminescence and Bioluminescence: Past, Present and Future,
ed. A. Roda, RSC Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 2010.
A. J. Brown, P. S. Francis, J. L. Adcock, K. F Lim and N. W. Barnett,
Anal. Chim. Acta, 2008, 624, 175.
1
1
Previously, we have detected the formation of singlet O ( D )
in the solid-phase interaction of XeF on silica gel, which was
explained by the adsorption destruction of O3 generated in the
reaction. In the test system, the elimination of O was also detecte
spectrophotometrically (257 nm). The literature and experimental
data suggest that CL at 580–709 nm is caused by the radiation
of singlet oxygen dimole ( O ) . The fine correlation of the CL
maxima observed at 580, 630 and 709 nm with the reported data
on the radiative transitions of ( O ) (578, 633 and 703 nm)
2
g
10
2
4 Yu. B. Tsaplev, R. F. Vasil’ev and A. V. Trofimov, High Energy Chem.,
2015, 49, 189 (Khim. Vys. Energ., 2015, 49, 216).
5 Yu. B. Tsaplev, R. F. Vasil’ev and A. V. Trofimov, High Energy Chem.,
1
6
d
3
2
015, 49, 316 (Khim. Vys. Energ., 2015, 49, 356).
6
7
L. N. Khazimullina, V. A. Antipin, A. V. Mamykin, I. G. Tananaev, V. P.
Kazakov and B. F. Myasoedov, Radiochemistry, 2007, 49, 41 (Radio-
khimiya, 2007, 49, 38).
G. A. Masyagutova, A. V. Mamykin, I. G. Tananaev, V. P. Kazakov and
B. F. Myasoedov, Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 7.
1
2
2
1
17
2
2
confirms this supposition.
Note that 2 min after the powders of UO HPO ·4H O and
8 N. Bartlett and F. O. Sladky, Chem. Commun. (London), 1968, 1046.
J. I. Steinfeld, Chem. Rev., 1989, 89, 1291.
0 G. A. Masyagutova, A. V. Mamykin and S. S. Ostakhov, Mendeleev
Commun., 2015, 25, 375.
1 I. V. Melikhov, E. F. Simonov, V. E. Bozhevol’nov and V. V. Vedenyapin,
Khemoreaktivnoe dvizhenie tverdykh tel, reagiruyushchikh s gazom
(Chemoreactivity Movement of Solids Reacting with a Gas), KDU,
Moscow, 2006 (in Russian).
2 R. A. Lidin, L. L. Andreeva and V. A. Molochko, Konstanty neorgani-
cheskikh veshchestv: spravochnik (The Constants of Inorganic Compounds:
Handbook), Drofa, Moscow, 2006 (in Russian).
3 A. R. Striganov and N. S. Sventitskii, Tablitsy spektral’nykh linii neitral’nykh
i ionizirovannykh atomov (Tables of Spectral Lines of Neutral and Ionized
Atoms), Atomizdat, Moscow, 1966 (in Russian).
14 E. B. Saloman, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 2004, 33, 765.
15 J. T. Bell and R. E. Biggers, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1965, 18, 247.
6 A. I. Voloshin, G. L. Sharipov, V. P. Kazakov and G. A. Tolstikov, Bull.
Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci., 1986, 35, 2397 (Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR,
Ser. Khim., 1986, 2613).
7 W. Adam, D. V. Kazakov and V. P. Kazakov, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105,
3371.
9
2
4
2
1
1
XeF were mixed, the CL intensities were redistributed over the
2
entire spectral range (Figure 1, spectrum 3). When the CL at
2
+
5
20 nm due to *UO2 decreased, the radiation of *Xe (460 nm)
1
became pronounced and the luminescence in the region of ( O )
2
2
(
580–709 nm) emission increased.
Figure 2 shows the luminescence spectra of polycrystalline
specimens of UO HPO ·4H O, the reaction product of XeF
1
1
2
4
2
2
with UO HPO ·4H O, and UO F ·2.5H O, whose light sums
2
4
2
2
2
2
corresponding to the quantum yields (j) of FL are 73, 17 and 6,
respectively. Because j of FL of the reaction product of XeF2
with UO HPO ·4H O takes an intermediate position between
2
4
2
2
+
those for UO2 hydrogen phosphate and fluoride, it is reasonable
to suppose the formation of uranyl phosphate-fluoride complexes.
1
–
In turn, the complexation of the F anion with uranyl leads to
induced xenon difluoride decomposition.
1
Because the solid-phase reaction of XeF with UO HPO ·4H O
2
2
4
2
1
was carried out in a sealed quartz cell and the lifetime of O
18 C. Schweitzer and R. Schmidt, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 1685.
19 P. Groz, J. Kiss, A. Reverz and T. Siros, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1966, 28,
2
monomole in a gas phase was 72 min,18 the rise in CL intensity
9
09.
in the region of 580–709 nm can be explained by the accumula-
tion of singlet oxygen dimole in the bulk. Really, after depres-
surization and blowing the reactor with air, luminescence in the
2
0 J. M. Schreyer and C. F. Baes, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1954, 76, 354.
1
region of ( O ) emission was not detected.
2
2
2
+
Therefore, UO hydrogen phosphate is both the initiator of
2
the solid-phase decomposition of xenon difluoride due to accepting
Received: 17th February 2016; Com. 16/4849
–
406 –