N. Murakami et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 358 (2012) 106–111
111
h)). However, even among anatase TiO samples with well-defined
2
faces, photocatalytic activity decreased with increase in particle
size from 40 nm to 60 nm. These results also indicate that well-
defined faces as well as specific surface area are important factors
for higher photocatalytic activity. Difference in surface area ratio
of {0 0 1} to {1 0 1} for decahedral anatase TiO2 might have an
influence on efficiency of photocatalytic reaction. However, slight
differences in the aspect ratio evaluated from SEM observation
(1.35–1.46) and the integrated intensity ratio of anatase 004 peak to
that of anatase 1 0 1 peak in XRD patterns (0.185–0.220) for decahe-
dral anatase TiO indicate that the difference in surface area ratio of
2
{
0 0 1} to {1 0 1} was not large enough to change the photocatalytic
efficiency.
4. Conclusions
In this paper, we discussed the relationship between photocat-
alytic activity and particle size of decahedral anatase TiO2 with
1 0 1} and {0 0 1} exposed crystal faces. Anatase TiO2 with well-
{
defined faces showed higher activity, and decahedral anatase with
particle width of ca. 40 nm showed excellent activity because of
the optimized balance between efficient separation of redox sites
and large specific surface area. The results of present study indicate
that change in particle size as well as change in surface area ratio of
reduction to oxidation sites of a shape-controlled nanocrystal has
the potential to control reaction properties.
Fig. 5. Initial rates of CO2 generation as photocatalytic activity (rCO2 ) against Wave
of (square) commercial TiO2, (blue open-triangle) particles with rasp of more than
1
.5, (red open-circle) particles with rasp of less than 1.5, (red filled-circle) samples
prepared with stirring, (green open-diamond) sample-n.
tendency with particle width of more than 40 nm. This result
can be explained by a trade-off relationship between particle size
(
crystallinity) and specific surface area (adsorption sites), though
Acknowledgements
photocatalytic activity depends also on other physical and chemi-
cal properties. Higher photocatalytic activity for decahedral anatase
with particle width of ca. 25 nm than that for commercial anatase
indicates that two kinds of exposed crystal faces, i.e., {1 0 1} and
This work was supported by the Knowledge Cluster Initiative,
Grant-in-Aid of Young Scientist (B) (22750139) implemented by
the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
{
0 0 1} exposed crystal faces, induced efficient photocatalytic reac-
(MEXT), and the JST PRESTO program.
tion as a result of separation of redox sites.
Photocatalytic activity of decahedral anatase TiO2 increased
with increase in particle width up to ca. 40 nm. This is because redox
reaction proceeded more efficiently due to longer spatial separa-
tion of redox sites on larger particles. Electron diffusion length of
References
[1] M.R. Hoffmann, S.T. Martin, W. Choi, D.W. Bahnemann, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995)
69–96.
[
2] A. Fujishima, T.N. Rao, D.A. Tryk, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev.
1 (2000) 1–21.
more than a few micrometers in a polycrystalline anatase TiO film
2
[
18] indicates that electrons generated near oxidation sites ({0 0 1}
[3] F. Amano, T. Yasumoto, O.O.P. Mahaney, S. Uchida, T. Shibayama, B. Ohtani,
Chem. Commun. (2009) 2311–2313.
exposed crystal faces) can sufficiently migrate to reduction sites
(
particle size of ca. 40 nm.
[
4] F. Amano, O.O.P. Mahaney, Y. Terada, T. Yasumoto, T. Shibayama, B. Ohtani,
Chem. Mater. 21 (2009) 2601–2603.
{1 0 1} exposed crystal faces) in an anatase TiO2 nanocrystal with
[5] D. Zhang, G. Li, H. Wang, K.M. Chan, J.C. Yu, Cryst. Growth Des. 10 (2010)
130–1137.
6] F. Amano, T. Yasumoto, O.O.P. Mahaney, S. Uchida, T. Shibayama, Top. Catal. 53
2010) 455–461.
1
In contrast, rod-like anatase TiO2 prepared by hydrothermal
treatment of PTA solution with less MPVA showed lower activity
with increase in particle width. This might be due to lower reduc-
tion performance of side-exposed crystal faces ({1 0 0} faces or
zigzag surfaces of {1 0 1} faces). However, our group and other
groups have shown that anatase TiO2 with {1 0 0} faces or zigzag
faces of {1 0 1} faces and moderate {0 0 1} faces shows suffi-
ciently high photocatalytic activity [8,12,16]. Therefore, the lower
photocatalytic activity of rod-like anatase TiO2 is attributable to
not-optimized surface area ratio of reduction to oxidation sites [19].
Further increase in particle size (>ca. 40 nm) of decahe-
dral anatase deteriorated photocatalytic activity because of the
decrease in specific surface area as well as worse-defined faces,
resulting in less efficient separation of redox sites. Actually, anatase
TiO2 prepared under the condition of large MPVA and high pHPTA
with stirring showed a higher photocatalytic activity than that of
anatase TiO2 prepared without stirring because stirring during the
hydrothermal growth process improved surface structure (Fig. 2(b,
f) → Fig. 4(a, e), Fig. 2(c, g) → Fig. 4(c, g), Fig. 2(d, h) → Fig. 4(d,
[
(
[7] W.Q. Fang, X. Gong, H.G. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 (2011) 725–734.
[8] J. Pan, G. Liu, G.Q. Lu, H. Cheng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (2011) 2133–2137.
[
9] J. Li, Y. Yu, Q. Chen, J. Li, D. Xu, Cryst. Growth Des. 10 (2010) 2111–2115.
[
10] T. Tachikawa, S. Yamashita, T. Majima, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011)
7197–7204.
[11] T. Ohno, K. Sarukawa, M. Matsumura, New J. Chem. 26 (2002) 1167–1170.
12] N. Murakami, Y. Kurihara, T. Tsubota, T. Ohno, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009)
062–3069.
[
3
[13] M. Kakihana, M. Tada, M. Shiro, V. Petrykin, M. Osada, Y. Nakamura, Inorg. Chem.
40 (2001) 891–894.
14] K. Tomita, V. Petrykin, M. Kobayashi, M. Shiro, M. Yoshimura, M. Kakihana,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45 (2006) 2378–2381.
15] Y. Gao, H. Luo, S. Mizusugi, M. Nagai, Cryst. Growth Des. 8 (2008) 1804–1807.
[16] J. Li, D. Xu, Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 2301–2303.
[
[
[
[
[
17] J.H. Liao, L.Y. Shi, S. Yuan, Y. Zhao, J.H. Fang, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009)
8778–18783.
1
18] S. Nakade, M. Matsuda, S. Kambe, Y. Saito, T. Kitamura, T. Sakata, Y. Wada, H.
Mori, S. Yanagida, J. Phys. Chem. B 106 (2002) 10004–10010.
19] N. Murakami, S. Katayama, M. Nakamura, T. Tsubota, T. Ohno, J. Phys. Chem. C
115 (2011) 419–424.