Paper
Catalysis Science & Technology
representative for this phase and described by Camacho et al.31 in a rapid consecutive reaction. With decreasing gas phase
The dominant presence of the signals from the trioxide phase oxygen partial pressure, MoO3 becomes gradually reduced to
results from the much lower Raman cross section of the dioxide MoO2 such that the catalyst presents actually a phase mixture of
and strong self-absorption.32 Nevertheless, the coexistence of the MoO3 and MoO2 and possible suboxide phases that were not
trioxide and the dioxide phase at the position of full oxygen detected by methods used in this work. Interestingly, the lattice
conversion is clearly visible in Fig. 7B.
oxygen does hardly attack ethane or carbon monoxide but rather
To confirm the Raman assignments, XRD diffractograms oxidizes selectively the desired product ethylene to carbon
were measured on spheres from regions A, B and C. The results dioxide and water. At very low oxygen partial pressures in the
are shown in Fig. 8 together with a diffractogram of the ‘as gas phase, hydrogen appears as another product. The reduction
prepared’ spheres. The main reflexes were assigned according of MoO3 goes to completion and basically phase pure MoO2 is
to Regalbuto et al.33 and Kumari et al.34
formed upon full conversion of gas phase oxygen. From a
methodical point of view it was shown that spatially resolved
Raman spectroscopy could be coupled with the spatial kinetic
data, revealing the intimate interplay between reaction kinetics
and catalyst dynamics. The combination of kinetic and spectro-
scopic reactor profiles takes in situ catalysis research to a new
level and motivates further improvements and the extension to
other spectroscopic methods.
4 Conclusion
The present work demonstrates for the first time combined
kinetic and spectroscopic reactor profiles measured with high
resolution through a fixed bed tubular reactor under in situ
conditions. Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene on
a nominally MoO3/g-Al2O3 catalyst was chosen as a test reac-
tion. Already a qualitative analysis of the obtained kinetic and
spectroscopic data provides detailed insight into the kinetics of
the reaction and the dynamics of the catalyst which are closely
coupled. Ex situ catalyst characterization by micro-Raman
spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction complements the in situ
data. Fig. 9 summarizes the mechanistic picture that was
derived schematically. In the entrance section of the catalyst
bed where the gas phase oxygen partial pressure is still high
(region A), MoOx is present as MoO3 which functions as a
catalyst for oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene
and water. Also by reaction with gas phase oxygen, CO is formed
Acknowledgements
¨
First and foremost the authors thank Prof. Dr. Robert Schlogl
for supporting this work with scientific input and funds.
Additionally we thank Achim Klein–Hoffmann for shaping the
tips of the Raman sensor, Frank Girgsdies for XRD analysis and
Giesela Lorenz for the BET service. We are also very grateful to
the German Research Foundation for funding the Emmy
Noether Junior Research Group ‘High Temperature Catalysis’.
Finally we acknowledge funding by the Federal Ministry of
Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of the
Cluster of Excellence ‘Unifying Concepts in Catalysis’.
References
1 P. L. Hansen, J. B. Wagner, S. Helveg, J. R. Rostrup-Nielsen,
B. S. Clausen and H. Topsoe, Sience, 2002, 295, 2053–2055.
¨
2 A. C. Sanfiz, T. W. Hansen, D. Teschner, P. Schnorch, F. Girgsdies,
¨
A. Trunschke, R. Schlogl, M. H. Looi and S. B. A. Hamid, J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2010, 114, 1912–1921.
3 F. C. Meunier, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4602–4614.
4 R. L. Puurunen, B. G. Beheydt and B. M. Weckhuysen, J. Catal., 2001,
204, 253–257.
5 U. Bentrup, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4718–4730.
6 A. Brueckner, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4673–4684.
7 J.-D. Grunwaldt, S. Hannemann, C. G. Schroer and A. Baiker, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2006, 110, 8674–8680.
8 Y. Yang, R. S. Disselkamp, J. Szanyi, C. H. F. Peden, C. T. Campbell
and J. G. Goodwin, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2006, 77, 094104.
9 M. G. O’Brien, A. M. Beale, S. D. M. Jacques, M. D. Michiel and
B. M. Weckhuysen, ChemCatChem, 2009, 1, 99–102.
10 A. Urakawa and A. Baiker, Top. Catal., 2009, 52, 1312–1322.
11 J. Sa, D. L. A. Fernandes, F. Aiouache, A. Goguet, C. Hardacre,
D. Lundie, W. Naeem, W. P. Partridge and C. Stere, Analyst, 2010,
135, 2260–2272.
12 J. Touitou, K. Morgan, R. Burch, C. Hardacre and A. Goguet, Catal.
Sci. Technol., 2012, 2, 1811–1813.
13 T. Ressler, R. E. Jentoft, J. Wienold, M. M. Gu¨nter and O. Timpe,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104, 6360–6370.
14 P. A. Spevack and N. S. McIntyre, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96,
9029–9035.
15 F. Cavani and F. Trifiro, Catal. Today, 1995, 24, 307–313.
16 F. Klose, M. Joshi, C. Hamel and A. Seidel-Morgenstern, Appl. Catal.,
A, 2004, 260, 101–110.
Fig. 9 Mechanistic picture of the ODH of ethane over a MoO3 catalyst: The
conversion to ethylene occurs exclusively in the presence of gas phase oxygen (A
and B). Further oxidation of only ethylene, and not ethane or CO, using lattice
oxygen (labeled with *) to CO2 is associated with the reduction of the catalyst to
MoO2 (B and C).
17 J. Haber and E. Lalik, Catal. Today, 1997, 33, 119–137.
c
174 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3, 169--175
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013