G Model
MOLCAA-9037; No. of Pages7
ARTICLE IN PRESS
L. Nie et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
2
Table 1
Experimental conditions for the as-synthesized catalysts and their physical properties.
2
3
Sample
Sample composition
Pt dispersion (%)
SBET (m /g)
Vpore (cm /g)
dpore (nm)
A
B
C
D
Pt/FTiO2-NS
A + NaOH
Pt/TiO2-NS
C + HF
6.3
53.7
66.9
9.0
92
87
91
93
0.33
0.27
0.27
0.24
14.3
12.1
12.1
9.4
also confirmed that the presence of Cl on Pd/Al O catalyst strongly
inhibited the conversion of methane and removal of Cl resulted
in the similar activity as Cl-free Pd catalysts. They explained that
6 h. To investigate F-poisoning deactivation mechanism, a F-free
Pt/TiO -NS catalyst (sample C) was prepared using F-free TiO -NS
(F was first removed by NaOH solution washing) as the support.
2
3
2
2
−
the observed reduction in the catalytic activity of Pd/Al O3 was
F-free TiO -NS was obtained by washing twice the sample with
2
2
caused by partial blocking of Pd surface active sites by the resid-
ual chlorine during the aforementioned reaction. Gracia et al. [18]
investigated the poisoning effect of Cl of supported Pt catalysts for
CO, methane and ethane oxidation in details by in situ IR and con-
trolled atmosphere EXAFS spectroscopy, and they also proposed
that site blocking is the mechanism of chloride poisoning. How-
ever, fluorine and chlorine are in the same group of periodic table
of elements, they have similar chemical properties. Would the flu-
orine poisoning be happened if supported Pt catalyst is prepared
0.5 M NaOH aqueous solution. Then, the sample C was prepared by
the above impregnation and NaBH -reduction method, similarly
4
to the preparation of A. In order to further confirm the effect of
fluoride poisoning, the sample C was fluorinated again with HF
solution. 0.5 g of sample C was dispersed in 10 mL deionized water,
and 0.5 mL HF solution (with a concentration ca. 40 wt%) was
added, then stirred for 60 min. Finally, the sample was separated
◦
from water and dried in an oven at 80 C for 6 h; it was denoted as
D. The experimental details are shown in Table 1.
−
from F-containing precursors or the supports contain F ion. To
the best of our knowledge, the F-poisoning/deactivation of Pt/TiO2
catalysts has not been reported yet.
2.2. Characterization
In this paper, F-poisoning/deactivation phenomenon is for the
first time reported for a Pt/TiO -NS catalyst during the HCHO
2
Pt/TiO -NS catalysts were analyzed using a D/Max-RB X-ray
2
oxidative decomposition at room temperature, and an efficient
regeneration method of the deactivated catalysts is proposed by
NaOH washing due to the residual fluorine easily removed from
TiO2 surface [25–27]. The mechanism of fluorine poisoning and
regenerated was also discussed.
diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan) with Cu K␣ radiation at a scan
◦
−1
rate (2ꢀ) of 0.05 s . Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM)
images were collected on a JEM-2100F microscope at an acceler-
ating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
measurements were performed on VG ESCALAB250xi with X-ray
monochromatisation. All binding energies (BE) were referenced
to the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV of the surface adventitious carbon.
The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area (SBET) of powders
was evaluated from nitrogen adsorption data recorded by using
a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 nitrogen adsorption apparatus (USA).
2
. Experimental
2.1. Sample preparation
All reagents were of analytical grade and were used with-
◦
All the samples were degassed at 180 C prior to nitrogen adsorp-
out further purification. Anatase TiO2 nanosheets with exposed
0 0 1) facets (FTiO -NS, containing fluoride) were prepared by the
tion measurements. The BET surface area was determined by a
multipoint method using adsorption data in the relative pressure
(
2
hydrothermal method [28,29]. In the typical synthesis, 25 mL of
Ti(OC H ) and 3 mL of hydrofluoric acid solution (with a concen-
(
P/P ) range of 0.05–0.3. The pore size distributions were deter-
0
4
9 4
mined using desorption data by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH)
method. The single-point pore volume was obtained from nitro-
gen adsorption volume at the relative pressure of 0.98. The relation
between the surface area, pore volume and pore width for cylin-
drical pore model was used to estimate the average value of the
latter. Platinum dispersion was measured by H2 chemisorption
on a Micrometrics AutoChem 2920 Pulse Chemisorption System,
using a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) to monitor H2 con-
tration ca. 40 wt %) were mixed in a dried Teflon-line autoclave
having capacity of 100 mL at ambient temperature, followed by
◦
hydrothermal treatment of the mixture at 180 C for 24 h. After
hydrothermal reaction, the white precipitate was collected by cen-
trifuge, washed three times with distilled water and ethanol, and
◦
then dried in an oven at 80 C for 6 h.
A sample of the F-poisoned/deactivated Pt/FTiO -NS catalyst
2
(
denoted as A) was prepared by impregnation of the as-prepared
sumption and assuming a H :Pt = 1:2 stoichiometric ratio. Prior to
2
FTiO -NS with Pt precursor followed by reduction with NaBH4
2
chemisorption, the catalyst was pretreated in flowing argon for 1 h
[
30,31]. In a typical preparation, 1 g of FTiO -NS was added into
2
◦
at 200 C and then it was cooled down to ambient temperature. The
an H PtCl solution (10 mL, 2.56 mmol/L) under magnetic stirring.
2
6
◦
chemisorption data were collected stepwise at 45 C. The platinum
After impregnation for 1 h, 2.5 mL of the mixed solution of NaBH4
solution (0.1 mol/L) and NaOH solution (0.5 mol/L) was quickly
added into the suspension under vigorous stirring for 30 min.
dispersion (D) was calculated from the H chemisorption data using
2
the following equation:
◦
After reduction, the suspension was evaporated at 100 C under
ꢀ
ꢁ
◦
Vs × Fs × M
Ws × Vm
stirring. Finally, the samples were dried at 80 C for 6 h. The
D =
× 100
nominal weight ratio of Pt to TiO2 was fixed to be 0.5 wt%. Then,
one sample of regenerated Pt/TiO -NS catalyst (denoted as B)
2
where Vs is the volume of adsorbed gas (STP, standard temperature
was obtained by washing the A sample with NaOH solution. In a
typical regeneration, 1 g of the sample A was dispersed in 10 mL of
3
and pressure) (cm ), Fs is the stoichiometric factor, which is equal
2
0.5 M NaOH aqueous solution under vigorous shaking for 30 min in
an ultrasonic cleaner and then separated. The above process was
3
◦
(cm /mol).
repeated, and the resulting sample was dried in an oven at 80 C for