Role of Migrating OH Radicals
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 106, No. 45, 2002 11819
the TiO2 suspension, dried under air, and then heated at 400 °C
for 30 min. The dip-coating procedure was repeated several
times until the thickness of the TiO2 film was approximately
∼
1 µm. One side of the TiO2-coated glass plate was cautiously
wiped out. Black carbon soot film (∼2 µm thickness) was
directly flame-deposited on the TiO2-coated glass plate by
burning n-hexane. The apparent UV absorption coefficient (ꢀλ)
of the hexane-soot film was estimated by measuring the
absorbance (or transmittance) of a soot-coated glass plate as a
function of the thickness of the soot film. The ꢀλ value of soot
4
-1
was determined to be approximately 2 × 10 cm at 350 nm.
Photolysis and Analysis of Soot. The soot photolysis
experiments were carried out under ambient air. When we
needed to monitor the CO2 generation from the photodegrading
soot on TiO2, a closed circulation reactor was used. It consisted
3
of a Teflon reactor (volume 21 cm ) with a quartz window (area
7
2
cm ) and a magnetically driven circulation pump (Takatsuki
2
Figure 1. Decrease of soot mass on TiO film as a function of UV
Co., SPP-3EBS) connected to the reactor. The air circulation
irradiation time. Two different modes of illumination (front vs back)
are compared for their degradation efficiencies. The initial soot thickness
was ∼2.2 µm.
3
-1
rate was about 200 cm min . Light illumination was carried
out using a 200-W mercury lamp. The soot-deposited TiO2 film/
glass was irradiated through a Pyrex glass cover to transmit
light with λ > 300 nm only. The light was incident on either
the soot-coated side (front irradiation) or the uncoated glass side
that initiated soot degradation. After more than 30 h of back
irradiation, the soot layer was completely oxidized, with the
black color of the soot-coated TiO2 film turning into white. The
cross-sectional SEM images of the soot layer on TiO2 film
(Figure 2) exhibit the progressive degradation of soot as the
irradiation time increases. The image shows that the soot layer
of ∼2 µm thickness completely disappeared after 32 h irradia-
tion, which corresponds to a soot oxidation rate of ∼65 nm/h.
The hexane soot layer shows very porous structure and has been
(back irradiation). The distance between the sample and the lamp
was 22 cm. The light flux onto the sample surface was measured
2
to be 1.5 mW/cm (300 nm < λ < 400 nm) using a power
meter (Newport 1815-C with a 818-UV silicon diode detector).
All the photolysis experiments were performed under air in a
lamp-housing box (35 cm × 30 cm × 35 cm) where the
temperature was maintained at 43-45 °C during irradiation.
When the effect of oxygen was investigated, the photolysis was
carried out under pure oxygen or helium atmospheres. A set of
duplicate or triplicate samples was tested under each experi-
mental condition. For the control experiment, the soot layer
deposited directly on a glass plate without TiO2 coating was
irradiated to compare its direct photodegradation with the
photocatalytic degradation of soot on TiO2. The loss of soot
mass due to photodegradation was monitored by weighing the
soot-coated glass plate before and after UV irradiation.
2
11
reported to have a B.E.T. surface area of 46 m /g, which is
very similar to that of P25 TiO2 used in this study. An
1
2
ellipsometric study by Remillard et al. reported that solid
stearic acid films (one or two layers with ∼30 Å thickness) on
TiO2 degraded with a removal rate of ∼22 nm/h under UV
illumination in air. Considering that the stearic acid films should
be much denser than the porous soot film, the photocatalytic
removal rates of the two different films are quite comparable
even though their thickness differs by a factor of 1000. Although
the oxidants should be produced on the surface of the TiO2 film,
a strict two-dimensional surface reaction at the soot/TiO2
interface cannot account for the complete degradation of the
soot bulk layer. This implies that the active oxidants generated
on the TiO2 surface desorbed and migrated into the bulk of the
soot layer. We believe that the migrating photooxidants played
a similar role in the photocatalytic degradation of stearic acid
The CO2 generated in the UV-illuminated reactor was
quantified using an on-line connected gas chromatograph (GC
Hewlett-Packard 6890) that was equipped with a flame ioniza-
tion detector (FID), a Porapak column, a CO2 methanizer (HP
G2747A), and a gas sampling valve. Images of the soot layer
on TiO2 film were obtained before and at regular time intervals
during UV illumination by using SEM (Hitach, S-2460N). The
cross-section of the soot/TiO2 film was imaged to measure the
soot thickness. The samples were coated in gold using a sputter
coater before SEM analysis. Raman spectroscopic analysis
1
2
layers on TiO2 films.
The oxidation of soot produced CO2 as shown in Figure 3.
The rates of CO2 production (or the soot oxidation rates) were
much higher under oxygen than air or helium, indicating that
the presence of O2 was essential for the soot oxidation. Under
the helium atmosphere, the CO2 generation proceeded until the
steady state was reached at about 30 min, which implied that
the trace oxygen that was adsorbed or trapped in the pore of
soot layer was depleted and further oxidation was inhibited. In
accordance with the mass monitoring experiment of Figure 1,
the soot layer directly deposited on the glass plate without TiO2
did not emit any CO2 at all under air and UV irradiation. The
CO2 production rates (Figure 3) decelerated gradually over time,
which seemed to be ascribed to depleting water vapor (or
adsorbed water) concentration in a close circulation reactor. The
presence of water vapor was essential for the efficient photo-
oxidation of soot (vide infra: Figure 8). In Figure 4, the rates
of CO2 production from three soot samples having different
thickness are compared between the front and back irradiation
(using a Renishaw system 3000 with an excitation wavelength
of 632.8 nm) of the flame-deposited black carbon soot showed
the presence of graphitic carbons.
Results and Discussion
Photocatalytic Degradation of Soot on TiO2. Figure 1
compares the time-dependent profiles of soot degradation
between the front and back irradiation modes under air. Direct
photolytic degradation of soot without TiO2 was not observed
at all. The soot degraded slower under the front irradiation than
the back irradiation. This is due to the fact that the soot layer
blocked some fraction of incident UV in the front irradiation
mode with fewer photons reaching the underlying TiO2 surface.
On the other hand, the back irradiation provided unattenuated
light intensity onto the TiO2 film and generated more oxidants