X. Florenza et al. / Electrochimica Acta 142 (2014) 276–288
277
Fe(OOCR)2 + hꢀ→ Fe2+ + CO + R
+
•
(6)
hydroxylated derivatives up to complete combustion to CO , inor-
ganic ions and water. EAOPs are promising and environmentally
2
2
The aim of this paper is to gain a better knowledge on the decol-
orization and mineralization processes of azo dyes during their
EAOP treatments. To do this, the AO-H O , EF and PEF degrada-
friendly technologies that are very effective for organics degrada-
tion and easily usable and scalable [6–10]. Although some papers
have been recently published dealing with the decolorization and
removal of several azo dyes by these methods [11–15], much
deeper information about the influence of operating parameters
and generated products on the degradation processes of a high
number of these pollutants is needed to clarify the possible viability
of EAOPs for wastewater remediation.
2
2
tions of an azo dye widely used in the textile industry like Acid
2
−
Red 1 (AR1, C18H13N O S
8 2
, see characteristics in Table 1) were
comparatively studied at pH 3.0 using Pt/air-diffusion and BDD/air-
3
−
3
−3
diffusion cells. Solutions with 236 mg dm
AR1 (100 mg dm
of dissolved organic carbon (DOC)) were checked, since it corre-
sponds to typical azo dye contents found in industrial effluents
[34]. The influence of current density (j) on the decolorization effi-
ciency and mineralization degree and rate was examined to better
explain the role of generated oxidizing agents and/or UVA radia-
tion in all the EAOPs tested. Aromatic intermediates were identified
by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Generated
carboxylic acids and released inorganic ions were identified and
quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A
reaction sequence for AR1 mineralization involving all the products
detected is proposed. Finally, the relationship between decoloriza-
tion, mineralization and products formed is discussed.
The most typical EAOP is anodic oxidation (AO), where adsorbed
•
hydroxyl radical (M( OH)) is generated from water discharge by
reaction (1) at an anode (M) with high O -overpotential by applying
2
a high current [6,13,16–20].
M + H O → M( OH) + H + e−
•
+
(1)
2
The non-active boron-doped diamond (BDD) anode is currently
considered the best anodic material for AO since it generates very
•
high amounts of reactive physisorbed BDD( OH) radicals as a result
•
of its very weak BDD- OH interaction and great O -overpotential
2
[
21]. These properties confer BDD the ability of being more effective
to remove aromatics including azo dyes than other common anodes
such as Pt [22,23] and PbO2 [24,25].
2. Experimental
Carbonaceous cathodes like graphite [26], carbon or graphite
felts [12,26–30], activated carbon fiber [31], carbon sponge [32],
carbon-polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) gas (O2 or air) diffusion
2
.1. Chemicals
Reagent grade Acid Red 1 was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich
[
11,15,33–36], carbon nanotubes [37,38] and BDD [14,39,40] have
and used as received. Analytical grade anhydrous sodium sulfate
and iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate were purchased from Fluka and
Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. The solution pH was initially adjusted
with analytical grade sulfuric acid supplied by Across Organics.
Sodium perchlorate and perchloric acid, used in some trials, were
analytical grade purchased from Merck. Carboxylic acids, other
chemicals and solvents used in chromatographic techniques were
of HPLC, LC-MS and analytical grade purchased from Sigma-Aldrich,
Lancaster, Merck and Panreac. All solutions were prepared with
high-purity water obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q system with
shown a high efficiency for H O2 electrogeneration from the two-
electron reduction of injected O2 from reaction (2):
2
+
−
O (g) + H + 2e → H O
(2)
2
2
2
In an undivided cell for AO, the use of a carbon-PTFE air-diffusion
cathode minimizes the possible cathodic reduction of organic pol-
lutants [15,23]. In this EAOP, so-called AO with electrogenerated
H O (AO-H O ), other weaker reactive oxygen species (ROS) than
2
2
2
2
•
•
)
OH can be produced at the anode, like hydroperoxyl radical (HO2
from H O oxidation by reaction (3):
2
2
◦
resistivity > 18 Mꢁ cm at 25 C.
M + H O → M(HO •) + H+ + e−
(3)
2
2
2
2.2. Electrolytic system
Cathodes with ability for H O electrogeneration have also been
2
2
extensively used in indirect EAOPs based on Fenton’s reaction
Electrolytic experiments were performed in an open and undi-
chemistry [7–9]. The most common method is electro-Fenton (EF)
3
•
vided two-electrode cell of 150 cm capacity with an external jacket
allowing circulation of thermostated water regulated by a Selecta
Digiterm 3000524 thermostat. The anode was a BDD thin film sup-
plied by Adamant Technologies (La-Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland)
or a Pt sheet of 99.99% purity supplied by SEMPSA (Barcelona,
Spain). The cathode was a carbon-PTFE air-diffusion electrode from
E-TEK (Somerset, NJ, USA), mounted as described elsewhere [46],
[
11,12,15,26–30,32,35,36], where OH is produced in the bulk from
the reaction between generated H O and low amounts of added
2
2
2+
Fe ion by Fenton’s reaction (4) with optimum pH 2.8:
Fe2 + H O + H → Fe + OH + H O
+
+
3+
•
(4)
2
2
2
Reaction (4) is catalytic and can be propagated from Fe2+ regen-
eration, pre-eminently by Fe3+ reduction at the cathode [27,32].
allowing H O generation from air injection at a flow rate of 300
2
2
When an undivided cell is used in EF, organic molecules are
3
−1
2
•
cm min . All electrodes had a geometric area of 3 cm and were
separated about 1 cm. The assays were made at constant j by con-
necting the electrodes to an Amel 2053 potentiostat-galvanostat
and the potential difference of the cell was directly measured with
a Demestres 601BR digital multimeter. To remove the impurities of
the BDD anode surface and activate the air-diffusion cathode before
the degradation trials, they were polarized in 100 cm of a 0.05 mol
dm Na SO4 solution at 100 mA cm for 180 min.
All experiments were carried out with 100 cm of solutions
containing 236 mg dm AR1 in 0.05 mol dm Na SO4 as back-
mainly destroyed by the combined action of M( OH) formed at the
•
anode from reaction (1) and OH produced in the bulk from reac-
tion (4), along with a slower destruction by other weaker ROS such
•
as H O and HO [7]. Unfortunately, the EF treatment of aromatics
2
2
2
with an air-diffusion cathode does not allow total mineralization
of aromatic solutions due to the formation of Fe(III)-carboxylate
3
•
complexes that are only slowly removed by BDD( OH) [7,41]. This
−
3
−2
2
problem can be solved performing the photoelectro-Fenton (PEF)
process, in which the solution treated by EF is irradiated with UVA
light [15,31,33,42–45] and the degradation process is enhanced by:
3
−
3
−3
2
−
3
2+
2
+
3+
ground electrolyte at pH 3.0. In EF and PEF, 0.5 mmol dm Fe
(
i) the photoreduction of Fe(OH) , the pre-eminent Fe species at
were added to the solution as catalyst. The solution pH and the Fe2+
concentration were chosen since they have been found optimal for
similar treatments of other aromatics [11,15,33–36]. The solution
2+
•
pH near 3, to regenerate Fe producing more OH from reaction (5)
and (ii) the photolysis of generated Fe(III)-carboxylate complexes
by the general reaction (6):
◦
was maintained at 35.0 C, which is the maximum temperature
Fe(OH)2 + hꢀ→ Fe2+ + OH
+
•
(5)
that our system can be thermostated without significant water