C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. Control of T-cell signaling with caged peptide. (A) Cells plated
k
on bilayers displaying IE and ICAM-1 loaded with normal MCC form the
classic immunological synapse, with a central accumulation of TCR
surrounded by a peripheral ring of ICAM-1. Cells stimulated with caged
NVOC-MCC peptide display diffuse TCR and ICAM. (B) A migrating
cell displaying the stereotypical hand-mirror shape and ICAM wedge was
2
irradiated with UV (80 nW/µm , 60 s). Upon UV exposure, the cell rounded
up and formed the classic ICAM ring, indicative of synaptic signaling (signal
onset was within 5 min). (C) On bilayers displaying only the null peptide
MCC-T102E, UV irradiation does not cause any signaling. At 0 min, a
2
crawling cell was irradiated with UV (80 nW/µm , 30 s). Just after
irradiation, the cell retained the hand-mirror morphology. At 15 min, the
cell continues to crawl on the bilayer, indicating no damage or signaling.
Scalebars are 10 µm.
induce activation. These T cells were probably in an internal state
unreceptive to activation, possibly owing to mild antagonism by
MCC-T102E.
Figure 2. UV light restores agonist activity of caged peptide. (A) Cells
loaded with the calcium-sensitive dye Fluo-Lojo strongly flux calcium when
stimulated by bilayers displaying the agonist peptide MCC diluted in a
background of the self-peptide T102E. (B) When plated on bilayers
displaying caged NVOC-MCC peptide in the same dilution, cells do not
flux calcium and adopt a crawling morphology, similar to the response (C)
of cells to bilayers displaying only the self-peptide T102E. (D) Pre-
irradiation of NVOC-MCC loaded bilayers with UV light (15 min, 0.5
NVOC-MCC is an effective reagent for specific activation of
T-cell signaling on supported bilayers. Using a standard epi-
fluorescence microscope, T-cell signaling and immune synapse
formation can be activated in a spatially and temporally controlled
fashion. Future applications of photoreleasable peptide are most
promising in the area of subcellular protein patterning. By com-
bining nanofabricated barriers to diffusion with photolithography
of activating peptide, study of the effects of subcellular juxtaposition
of agonist and nonactivating peptide signals on T-cell activation
will be directly accessible.
2
nW/µm , 97% uncaged) rescues the stimulatory effect of the caged peptide.
Cell adhesion was confirmed with reflection interference contrast micros-
copy; dark regions indicate close adherence to the bilayer. Scalebar is 10
µm.
MCC bilayers exposed to UV light before the addition of cells
behaved similarly to MCC bilayers. Extended illumination with
>450 nm light did not uncage the NVOC, indicating visible light
fluorescence imaging is compatible with the caged peptide. These
data suggest that UV light successfully exposes the original MCC
peptide from NVOC-MCC in situ.
Acknowledgment. We thank D. King of the HHMI Mass
Spectrometry Facility for peptide synthesis and mass spectrometry.
N. Switz, M. B. Forstner, A. Liu, and K. Mossman provided
valuable discussion. A.L.D. is supported by an NSF Graduate
Research Fellowship. M.L.D. is supported by NIH grant AI044931.
Caged peptide also affects immune synapse formation. Cells that
were stimulated with bilayers loaded with 1:25 MCC/T102E
strongly tended to stop and form the characteristic immune synapse
pattern of a strong central accumulation of TCR surrounded by a
ring of ICAM (Figure 3A). In contrast, cells stimulated with bilayers
displaying NVOC-MCC did not form synapses. TCR was diffuse
over the face of these cells, whereas activated cells displayed the
classic central accumulation of TCR. The aggregate behavior is
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
supplementary figures. This material is available free of charge via
the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
k
(1) Krogsgaard, M.; Davis, M. M. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6 (3), 239.
similar to that of cells stimulated with empty IE or MCC-T102E
(
2) Fremont, D. H.; Dai, S. D.; Chiang, H.; Crawford, F.; Marrack, P.; Kappler,
J. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 195 (8), 1043.
k
loaded IE , indicating that cells were not activated by caged peptide.
(
3) Grakoui, A.; Bromley, S. K.; Sumen, C.; Davis, M. M.; Shaw, A. S.;
Allen, P. M.; Dustin, M. L. Science 1999, 285 (5425), 221.
Exposure to UV light was sufficient to activate T cells on bilayers
k
displaying caged MCC-IE . These results are shown for a typical
(4) Doh, J.; Irvine, D. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103 (15), 5700.
(
(
(
5) Krogsgaard, M.; Li, Q. J.; Sumen, C.; Huppa, J. B.; Huse, M.; Davis, M.
cell in Figure 3B. A migrating cell was irradiated with UV light at
M. Nature 2005, 434 (7030), 238.
2
∼
80 nW/µm for 60 s, sufficient to release essentially 100% of the
6) Mossman, K. D.; Campi, G.; Groves, J. T.; Dustin, M. L. Science 2005,
310 (5751), 1191.
caged peptide. Before uncaging, the cell displayed the hand-mirror
morphology and wedge-shaped ICAM distribution of a migrating
cell. After uncaging, the cell stopped, rounded up, and formed the
ring of ICAM characteristic of the immune synapse, indicating
activation of the TCR signaling cascade. A typical cell on a control
bilayer displaying only the null peptide MCC-T102E is shown in
Figure 3C. After irradiation, the cell continues to crawl, unaffected
by the UV exposure. Moreover, the UV light does not appreciably
bleach the Cy5 labeled ICAM, indicating that the caging group is
compatible with standard fluorescence imaging. UV light directed
onto a T cell already crawling on the surface sometimes did not
7) Reay, P. A.; Kantor, R. M.; Davis, M. M. J. Immunol. 1994, 152 (8),
3946.
(8) Davis, M. M.; Boniface, J. J.; Reich, Z.; Lyons, D.; Hampl, J.; Arden,
B.; Chien, Y.-h. Ann. ReV. Immunol. 1998, 16 (1), 523.
(
9) Kaye, J.; Hsu, M.-L.; Sauron, M.-E.; Jameson, S. C.; Gascoigne, N. R.
J.; Hedrick, S. M. Nature 1989, 341 (6244), 746.
(
10) Patchornik, A.; Amit, B.; Woodward, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92
(21), 6333.
(11) Fodor, S. P. A.; Read, J. L.; Pirrung, M. C.; Stryer, L.; Lu, A. T.; Solas,
D. Science 1991, 251 (4995), 767.
(
12) Lawrence, D. S. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9 (6), 570.
(13) Rusiecki, V. K.; Warne, S. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3 (4), 707.
(
14) Marriott, G. Biochemistry 1994, 33 (31), 9092.
JA065304L
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 128, NO. 48, 2006 15355