P. Diao et al. / Journal of Catalysis 250 (2007) 247–253
251
Pt electrodes. The high activity of AuNPs/ITO suggests that
the ITO substrate participates in the reaction and plays a key
role either in stabilizing the gold oxides [21] or in lowering
the activation energy of CO electrooxidation. Therefore, it is
likely that the oxidation of CO occurs preferentially at the Au–
ITO interface rather than at sites far from the ITO substrate.
This also can explain the fact that no electrocatalytic activity is
observed on bare gold electrode, because there is no Au–ITO
interface.
3
.3. Effect of particle size on the activity of gold/support
system toward CO electrooxidation
It should be pointed out that, in this work, the high activ-
ity of ITO-supported AuNPs toward CO electrooxidation has
been obtained on relatively large (13 nm) particles, which are
believed to be far less active in solid–gas reaction systems
Fig. 5. Normalized cyclic voltammograms of AuNPs/Pt and AuNPs/ITO in
.5 M KOH saturated with CO. The AuNPs/Pt and the AuNPs/ITO electrodes
0
[
3,5,14]. As we know that in solid–gas systems, the adsorption
are the same as those used in Fig. 2b, respectively. The currents are normalized
by dividing by the corresponding charges under the reduction peaks in Fig. 2b
and activation of oxygen on AuNPs/support system is a crucial
factor in the low-temperature oxidation of CO [18,19]. It has
been proposed that, compared with the large AuNPs, the small
AuNPs (<10 nm) more readily activate oxygen (form oxidic
gold species) at their surfaces [12,14,18,19] or at the AuNPs–
support interfaces [7–11], and thus are more active toward CO
oxidation. In an electrochemical system, gold oxides can be
easily formed by applying a positive potential to the electrode;
for example, a positive scan over 0.4 V in 0.5 M KOH can gen-
erate a layer of gold oxides on the surface of AuNPs regardless
of the support and the particle size (see Figs. 2b and 4b). Thus,
particle size has little effect on the formation of gold oxides in
electrochemical system. In other words, unlike in the solid–gas
reaction systems, the size of the gold particles is no longer the
dominant factor for CO oxidation in electrochemical systems,
due to the ease of formation of gold oxide on various-sized
AuNPs. This is why such large AuNPs exhibit high catalytic
activity for CO electrooxidation. To provide further support for
this point, we prepared gold submicroparticles (AuSMPs) on
ITO electrodes and investigated their electrocatalytic activity
toward CO oxidation.
−
1
after corrected for double-layer charging current. Scan rate 100 mV s
.
Fig. 2b, the area under the reduction peak (after correction for
the double-layer charging current) reflects the amount of charge
needed to reduce the surface gold oxides. In other words, the re-
duction peak area (or reduction charge) reflects the true surface
amount of oxidic gold species. For each AuNPs modified elec-
trode used in this work, the CV response in 0.5 M KOH was
first recorded to obtain the amount of gold oxides (represented
by the reduction charge) on the AuNP surface. To eliminate
the influence of particle density, the CV curves obtained in
CO-saturated solution were normalized by dividing by the cor-
responding charge under the reduction peaks in 0.5 M KOH.
Moreover, for all samples, the potential window was fixed in
the range −0.4–0.7 V to rule out the influence of the potential
on the amount of gold oxides. The normalized CV curves on
AuNPs/Pt and AuNPs/ITO, shown in Fig. 5, demonstrate that
the catalytic oxidation current is more than 4 times greater in
AuNPs/ITO than in AuNPs/Pt.
Before ascribing this activity difference to the support ef-
fect, we need to know the average amount of gold oxides per
particle on the ITO and Pt substrates. The total charge for the
reduction of gold oxides on particle-modified electrodes is ca.
Fig. 6 shows SEM images of AuSMPs prepared on ITO
substrates by electrochemical reduction of HAuCl4 at 0 V for
different durations. The particle size distributions for each de-
position time, shown in Fig. 7, demonstrate that the average
particle size increased from ca. 150 to 525 nm as the deposition
time was increased from 15 to 1800 s. These ITO-supported
AuSMPs are too large to be catalytically active for CO oxida-
tion in solid–gas reaction systems; however, they exhibit high
activity toward CO electrooxidation in the alkali solution, as
can be seen in Fig. 8. Similar to the CV curves obtained at
AuNPs-modified electrodes (Fig. 5), the currents in Fig. 8 are
also normalized by dividing by the corresponding gold oxide
reduction charge obtained at the same electrode in 0.5 M KOH
without CO. The current peaks for catalytic oxidation of CO
can be seen in the negative scan given in Fig. 8, providing solid
evidence that high catalytic activity is not confined to small
(<10 nm) AuNPs in the electrochemical system. Fig. 8 also
shows that the catalytic oxidation current decreases when the
−5
−5
4
(
.2 × 10 C for AuNPs/Pt and 2.4 × 10 C for AuNPs/ITO
see Fig. 2b). Therefore, on the basis of particle density on the
two substrates, the average reduction charge per particle is ca.
−16
−16
C on the
5
.2 × 10
C on the Pt substrate and 6.3 × 10
ITO substrate. These two values closely agree, suggesting that
the amount of gold oxides on each gold particle is similar no
matter which substrate is used. Then it can be concluded that
the great difference in reactivity toward CO oxidation between
AuNPs/ITO and AuNPs/Pt arises not from the amount of gold
oxides, but rather from the different nature of the substrate.
This means that even in electrochemical systems, the substrate
has a great effect on the catalytic activity of AuNPs. We be-
lieve that the difference in activity arises from the different
routes through which gold oxides react with CO on ITO and