Page 5 of 7
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
mL∙g−1∙h−1 as shown in Fig. 3(a), it can be seen that the 100%
conversion of HCHO over 3D-CeO2@CN could be obtained at
as low as 130 oC. Furthermore, the converted amount of HCHO
based on the mass of CeO2 and reaction time, namely HCHO
reaction rate, was calculated. From Fig. 3(b), we can see that
the reaction rate for 3D-CeO2@CN at 170 oC is about 5.5 times
that of bulk nano CeO2. This highlights again the superiority of
the composite for the catalytic activity improvement. For the
reference, the performances of some representative metal oxide
catalysts are listed in Table 1. We can see that 3D-CeO2@CN is
among the best non-noble metal catalyst comprehensively
considering the total HCHO conversion temperature as well as
the reaction rate. According to the previous characterization,
the boosted activity for 3D-CeO2@CN could be due to more
oxygen vacancies, abundant active surface oxygen and higher
reducibility of the CeO2 quantum dots. In addition, the CN
surface is responsible to stabilize CeO2 quantum dots and
particularly the hierarchical 3D structure could facilitate the
2016, 37, 102-122.
2. X. F. Tang, J. L. Chen, Y. G. Li, Y. Li, Y. D. Xu and W. J. Shen,
Chem. Eng. J., 2006, 118, 119-125.
3. S. J. Park, I. Bae, I. S. Nam, B. K. Cho, S. M. Jung and J. H. Lee,
Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 195, 392-402.
4. C. B. Zhang, H. He and K. Tanaka, Catal. Commun., 2005, 6,
211-214.
5. B. C. Liu, Y. Liu, C. Y. Li, W. T. Hu, P. Jing, Q. Wang and J.
Zhang, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2012, 127, 47-58.
6. B. B. Chen, C. A. Shi, M. Crocker, Y. Wang and A. M. Zhu, Appl.
Catal. B-Environ., 2013, 132, 245-255.
7. B. B. Chen, X. B. Zhu, M. Crocker, Y. Wang and C. Shi, Appl .
Catal. B-Environ., 2014, 154, 73-81.
8. Z. J. Liu, J. Yu, X. Y. Li, L. X. Zhang, D. Luo, X. H. Liu, X. W.
Liu, S. B. Liu, H. B. Feng, G. L. Wu, P. Z. Guo, H. L. Li, Z. H.
Wang and X. S. Zhao, Carbon, 2018, 127, 636-642.
9. X. Y. Li, X. L. Pan, L. Yu, P. J. Ren, X. Wu, L. T. Sun, F. Jiao
and X. H. Bao, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5.
DOI: 10.1039/C8TA00076J
10. X. Y. Li, P. Li, X. L. Pan, H. Ma and X. H. Bao, Appl Catal B-
Environ, 2017, 210, 116-120.
mass transfer, which synergistically contributes to the improved 11. Y. Sekine, Atmos Environ, 2002, 36, 5543-5547.
12. H. M. Chen, J. H. He, C. B. Zhang and H. He, J. Phys. Chem. C,
2007, 111, 18033-18038.
catalytic performance.
13. S. P. Rong, P. Y. Zhang, Y. J. Yang, L. Zhu, J. L. Wang and F.
Liu, Acs Catal., 2017, 7, 1057-1067.
14. J. Zhou, L. F. Qin, W. Xiao, C. Zeng, N. Li, T. Lv and H. Zhu,
Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2017, 207, 233-243.
15. B. Y. Bai, H. Arandiyan and J. H. Li, Appl. Catal. B-Environ.,
2013, 142, 677-683.
16. Y. Wang, A. M. Zhu, B. B. Chen, M. Crocker and C. Shi, Catal.
Commun., 2013, 36, 52-57.
17. X. F. Tang, Y. G. Li, X. M. Huang, Y. D. Xu, H. Q. Zhu, J. G.
Wang and W. J. Shen, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2006, 62, 265-
273.
18. Y. C. Huang, H. B. Li, M. S. Balogun, H. Yang, Y. X. Tong, X.
H. Lu and H. B. Ji, Rsc Adv., 2015, 5, 7729-7733.
19. R. Spinicci, M. Faticanti, P. Marini, S. De Rossi and P. Porta, J.
Mol. Catal. a-Chem., 2003, 197, 147-155.
20. S. Jones, Y. Y. Ji and M. Crocker, Catal. Lett., 2016, 146, 909-
917.
Conclusions
A novel method to prepare CeO2 quantum dots anchored on
three-dimensionally hierarchical nitrogen-doped porous carbon
has been demonstrated. Benefiting from the unique features of
smaller particles, higher specific surface area, unique
hierarchical pore structure, abundant oxygen vacancies and
enhanced redox properties, the composite showed superior
activity towards HCHO oxidation reaction with a reaction rate
o
of 5.5 times that of bulk CeO2 at reaction temperature of 170 C
and GHSV of 100,000 mL∙g−1∙h−1, manifesting itself potent
candidate for the noble metal replacement. This study also
points to a reliable strategy of constructing other 3D structured
composite for application in catalysis and beyond.
21. A. Trovarelli and J. Llorca, Acs Catal., 2017, 7, 4716-4735.
22. T. Montini, M. Melchionna, M. Monai and P. Fornasiero, Chem.
Rev., 2016, 116, 5987-6041.
23. P. Knauth, G. F. Harrington, S. R. Bishop, H. Saltsburg and H.
L.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Tuller, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2016, 99, 2415-2421.
24. Y. C. Huang, B. Long, M. N. Tang, Z. B. Rui, M. S. Balogun, Y.
X. Tong and H. B. Ji, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2016, 181, 779-
787.
25. J. J. Sheng, C. T. Li, L. K. Zhao, X. Y. Du, L. Gao and G. M.
Zeng, Fuel, 2017, 197, 397-406.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the financial support from Chinese
Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M600519), Natural
Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China
(ZR2016BB03) and the Taishan Scholars Advantageous and
Distinctive Discipline Program of Shandong Province, China.
The National Natural Foundation of China (21703113 and
21707015), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the
Central Universities (DUT16RC(4)01). The Australian
Research Council (ARC) is acknowledged for supporting this
research work under the ACR Laureate Fellowship program
(ProjectFL170100101).
26. J. Y. Liu, Acs Catal., 2017, 7, 34-59.
27. X. F. Yang, A. Q. Wang, B. T. Qiao, J. Li, J. Y. Liu and T.
Zhang, Accounts Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 1740-1748.
28. T. Zhang, Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. S., 2015, 249.
29. B. T. Qiao, A. Q. Wang, X. F. Yang, L. F. Allard, Z. Jiang, Y. T.
Cui, J. Y. Liu, J. Li and T. Zhang, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3, 634-641.
30. Q. Fu, S. J. Fiore, H. Saltsburg, X. M. Qi and M. Flytzani-
Stephanopoulos, Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. S., 2002, 224, U567-
U567.
31. C. W. Sun, H. Li and L. Q. Chen, Energ. Environ. Sci., 2012, 5,
8475-8505.
32. L. L. Geng, J. L. Song, Y. H. Zhou, Y. Xie, J. H. Huang, W. X.
Zhang, L. M. Peng and G. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52,
13495-13498.
Notes and references
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2018, 00, 1-3 | 5
Please do not adjust margins