S.-R. Zhu et al.
Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 121 (2018) 163–171
2. Experimental
2.5. Photocatalytic experiments
2
.1. Materials
The photocatalytic activity of the photocatalyst was measured by
photodegradation of Rhodamine B (RhB), tetracycline hydrochloride
(TC) and ciprofloxacin (CIP). 40 mg of sample was dispersed into
aqueous solution in a photochemical reactor containing 200 mL RhB
(20 mg/L), TC (10 mg/L) or CIP (10 mg/L). A 500 W Xe lamp using an
BILON photochemical reactor (Shanghai BILON Instrument
Corporation) was provided as a visible light source. The pH value was
not adjusted when the reaction was operated. Experiments were carried
out at 25 °C with a circulating water system to prevent thermal catalytic
effects. Prior to the irradiation, the solution was ultrasonicated for
Bismuth nitrate pentahydrate (Bi(NO
3
)
3
·5H
2
O), acetic acid (HAc),
·H O, 25–28%),
KBr, elemental sulfur (S), ammonium hydroxide (NH
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Sinopharm and
Aldrichand used without further purification.
3
2
2
2 3
.2. Synthesis of Bi S nanoparticles
Elemental sulfur (0.0116 g) was dissolved in 120 mL of DMSO at
40 °C, then, 0.1188 g of Bi(NO ·5H O was incorporated into this
OH aqueous solu-
5
min and stirred continuously magnetically for 30 min in the dark to
1
3
)
3
2
get a saturated pollutants absorption onto the photocatalyst surface. At
certain time intervals, 6 mL of suspensions were collected and cen-
trifuged to remove the products. The pollutants concentration of the
absorbance at the wavelength of 553 nm (RhB), 357 nm (TC) and
solution. After stirred for 30 min, 3.0 mL of the NH
4
tion was added to the reaction mixture which turned from transparent
to a light brown color. The formed colloid was held at 140 °C for 15 min
and then cooled to room temperature naturally. All the synthesis pro-
cess occurred under constant magnetic stirring.
272 nm (CIP) were analyzed by a TU-1901 spectrometer (Beijing
Purkinje General Instrument). The blank experiment was also treated
under the same processes, but no photocatalyst was mixed. The pho-
todegradation efficiency was evaluated by dividing C/C
0
, where C is the
2
.3. Preparation of BiOBr/Bi
2
S
3
nanocomposite
2 3
·5H O and a specified amount of Bi S
remained dye concentration and C is the starting dye concentration.
0
Typically, 0.243 g Bi(NO
3
)
3
2
2.6. Active species trapping experiments
nanoparticles was dissolved in 0.75 mL acetic acid (HAc), and the re-
sulting solution was added to 7.5 mL de-ionized water containing
0
room temperature, the suspension was transferred into a Teflon-lined
stainless steel autoclave (20 mL capacity) and heated at 120 °C for 6 h.
The resulting precipitate was filtrated, washed thoroughly with distilled
water to remove any possible ionic species in the product, and then
To explore the photocatalytic mechanism of the photocatalytic re-
action, radicals trapping experiments are further conducted to detect
the reactive active species generated during the irradiation of BiOBr/
.060 g KBr with ultrasonication for 10 min. After stirring for 20 min at
Bi
2 3
S -15 photocatalyst. 1 mM of hydroxyl radicals (∙OH) scavenger
+
(
isopropyl alcohol, IPA) [14], a holes (h ) scavenger (triethanolamine,
−
TEOA) [42] and a superoxide radicals (∙O
2
) scavenger (benzoquinone,
dried at 70 °C overnight. BiOBr/Bi
varying the Bi nanoparticles mass percent to 5.0% (BiOBr/Bi
0.0% (BiOBr/Bi -10), 15.0% (BiOBr/Bi -15) and 20.0% (BiOBr/
Bi -20). For comparison, pure BiOBr nanosheets were synthesized
under the same conditions in the absence of Bi nanoparticles. To
further understand BiOBr/Bi system, we use Bi nanoparticles as
O under the above same
2
S
3
-x system were prepared by
BQ) [43] were added to the RhB solution. Otherwise, the method was
similar to the described above-mentioned experiment of photo-
degradation of dye.
S
2 3
2 3
S -5),
1
2
S
3
2 3
S
2 3
S
2 3
S
2.7. Photoelectrochemical measurements
2
S
3
2 3
S
3
+
Bi sources of BiOBr instead of Bi(NO
conditions, and noted as BiOBr-B.
3 3 2
) ·5H
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were analyzed
on an electrochemical analyzer (CHI660E, Chenhua, Shanghai, China)
using a standard three-electrode system with the samples as the
working electrodes, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the re-
ference electrode, and a Pt wire as the counter electrode, respectively.
ITO and Ni film was used as the current collector of working electrode
for measuring photocurrent response and EIS, respectively. For the
fabrication of the working electrodes, 80 wt% of active materials, 10 wt
% of acetylene black (conductive agent) and 10 wt% of vinylidene
fluoride (binder)were dispersed in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone to form
homogeneous slurry. Then the slurry was dotted on the Ni film and
dried for 24 h at room temperature. EIS was performed from 0.01 Hz to
100 kHz at an open circuit potential of 0.3 V and alternating current
(AC) voltage amplitude of 5 mV. The electrodes were immersed in
2
.4. Characterization
The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the products were
investigated by a Bruker D8 advance X-ray diffractometer equipped
with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The FT-IR spectrum experiments
were performed on a Nicolet 6700 F T-IR spectrometer in the range of
−1
4
00–4000 cm . The morphology of the as-prepared samples was car-
ried out by Hitachi S-4800 field-emission scanning electron micro-
graphs (FESEM) at an acceleration voltage of 10.0 kV.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was measured with SII TG/DTA
7
300 instrument at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. UV–Vis diffuse re-
flectance spectra were recorded by a Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 UV/Vis/
NIR spectrometer using BaSO as reference in the wavelength of
00–800 nm. The chemical component and dispersive state was oper-
0.2 M of Na
lamp [44].
2 4
SO aqueous solution and illuminated by using a 500 W Xe
4
2
ated at Energy Dispersive Spectrometer using EDAX analyzer. X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were recorded on a
Thermo Fisher Scientific corporation Escalab 250Xi instrument. All
binding energies were calibrated using the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV.
Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the obtained samples were detected
at room temperature with a Hitachi F-4600 fluorescence spectrometer.
3. Results and discussion
The X-ray diffraction data of BiOBr samples prepared via hydro-
thermal method are shown in Fig. 1a. The peaks with 2θ values at 10.7°,
21.6°, 25.0°, 31.6°, 32.2°, 39.2°, 46.3°, 56.2°, 57.2° were respectively
indexed to (001), (002), (011), (012), (110), (112), (020), (114) and
(112) crystal planes of tetragonal BiOBr (JCPDS 73–2061) [45,46]. The
broad and superimposed signals in the diffractogram corresponding to
N
2
adsorption–desorption
isotherms
were
evaluated
with
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and pore size distributions measure-
ments using an ASAP 2020 apparatus. Transmission electron micro-
scopy (TEM) images were determined at a FEI corporation TF20.
Raman spectra was recorded on a Renishaw inVia-reflex micro-Raman
spectrometer with laser excitation of 785 nm.
the Bi
order, which is consistent with a previous report [26]. For BiOBr/Bi
15 photocatalyst, no typical diffraction peaks of Bi nanoparticles
were observed, indicating that the very low-range crystalline order of
2 3
S nanostructures account for the very low-range crystalline
2 3
S -
2 3
S
164