Full Papers
Halenda) method. Prior to data collection, each sample (�500 mg)
Experimental Section
Material Preparation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
°
was outgassed under vacuum at 200 C for 2 h.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Synthesis of the Stoichiometric Hap Support
Scanning electron micrographs were recorded on a JEOL JSM
7500F operating at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. Prior to analysis,
a thin chromium coating was performed on the samples in order to
reduce potential charging effect.
Stoichiometric hydroxyapatite, with a Ca/P molar ratio of 1.67, was
prepared by a co-precipitation technique.[26] 150 mL of an aqueous
solution of Ca(NO3)2 ·4H2O (0.0835 mole, Riedel-de Haën, purity
�98%) was added dropwise to 500 mL of a NH4H2PO4 solution
(0.05 mole, Fluka; purity �99%) under stirring at pH 10 (by properly
adding ammonia (25%; Scharlau) to the reaction media) under
reflux to give a white precipitate. The maturation duration was 1 h
under constant stirring. After filtration, washing with hot deionized
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
Thermogravimetric Analysis(TGA)
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out using a TA
Balance instrument, model: SDT 2960 DSC-TGA X, under a flow of
20% O2 in helium (100 mL.minÀ 1), goÀin1g from room temperature to
°
water and drying (80 C for 18 h) a calcination step was performed
in dry air (400 C for 4 h, 2 C.minÀ 1) to get the Hap support.
°
°
°
°
600 C with a heating rate of 5 C.min
.
Synthesis of the Catalysts (10wt% of TM)
Infrared Spectroscopy (IR)
CuHap: In a typical experiment 1.76 g of Cu(NO3)2 ·3H2O (Sigma
Aldrich, purity�99%), was dissolved in 50 mL of deionized water
and the apatitic support (4.0 g) was then added. The pH of the Cu
(II) nitrate aqueous solution (50 mL) was 4.0. This pH turned out to
be 4.6 when the Hap support (solid) was added to the Cu(II)
FTIR (Fourier transform infrared) spectra were recorded at room
temperature, under vacuum, in a spectral range spanning from 200
to 4000 cmÀ 1, while using a Nicolet 460 spectrometer. These spectra
were an average of 256 scans with a spectral resolution of 4 cmÀ 1
.
Thin, disk-shaped pellets of the catalysts were prepared by
compressing 30 mg of an intimate mixture, composed of 1 mg of
powdered sample combined with 100 mg of dried KBr. A spectrum
of an empty cell was first recorded. This spectrum served as a
background spectrum, which would be subsequently subtracted
from that of the samples analyzed.
°
solution (50 mL). Rotary evaporation (Büchi Rotavapor R-114; 60 C;
20 rpm; 70 mbar) was used to remove water. After 30 min of
evaporation (volume of the solution: 35 mL) the pH decreased to
4.3 to keep stable after further evaporation of the solution. The
recovered powder was dried and calcined in similar conditions to
those relative to the Hap support. MnHap: the synthesis was carried
in a similar way as for CuHap using Mn(NO3)2 ·4H2O (Sigma Aldrich
purity �97%) as Mn(II) precursor. The CuMn2Hap, CuMnHap and
Cu2MnHap samples (Cu/Mn molar ratio: 0.5; 1; 2) were synthesized
by dissolving the suitable Cu(II) and Mn(II) precursors in 50 mL of
deionized water and subsequently treated in a similar manner to
before. The weight percentages of Cu and Mn were 3.66% and
6.34%, 5.36% and 4.64%, 6.98% and 3.02% for CuMn2Hap,
CuMnHap, and Cu2MnHap, respectively.
X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
XPS measurements were carried out on an AXIS Ultra DLD Kratos
spectrometer, that employs a monochromatic AlÀ Kα source (hν=
1486.6 eV), operating at 120 W. The X-ray photoelectron spectra
were recorded at ambient temperature, while using an ultra-high
vacuum system (base pressure: 10À 9 mbar). All binding energies
were calibrated with respect to adventitious carbon C 1s peak BE
located at 284.8 eV. Data processing was performed using CasaXPS
software. The average oxidation state (AOS) of Mn was calculated,
based on the magnitude of the Mn 3 s multiplet splitting. XPS
spectra of Cu 2p core level were recorded twice: at the beginning
and at the end of XPS analysis. XPS quantification of Cu was
performed according to the method described in the work of Ye
et al.[15]
Characterization
X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
XRD studies were carried out using a Bruker AXS D8 Advance
powder diffractometer equipped with a LynxEye Super Speed
detector and a CuÀ Kα radiation (λ=1.5418 Å), operating in the
°
°
°
10 �2θ�55 range with a step of 0.02 and a count time of 5 s.
The identification of the crystalline phases present in a sample was
accomplished by comparing the registered patterns with the ICDD
PDF-4 database cards, processed on EVA software. Furthermore, the
mean crystallite size of the Hap supported Cu and/or Mn oxide
catalysts, was determined by the Scherrer equation corrected from
the line broadening of the apparatus using LaB6 as an internal
reference.
Temperature Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR) Coupled with
Mass Spectrometry (MS)
The H2-TPR experiments were carried out on a Micromeritics
Autochem II (2920) instrument, equipped with a U-shaped quartz
reactor. Temperature-programmed reduction experiments were
performed on the fresh (200 mg) and used catalysts (100 mg)
°
previously cleaned in Ar at 150 C for 1 h. After cooling down the
samples were flushed with 5 vol% H2/Ar gaseous mixture
°
°
°
N2 Physisorption Analysis
(50 mL.minÀ 1) from 25 C to 800 C (10 C.minÀ 1). The monitoring of
hydrogen consumption was performed by a thermal conductivity
detector (TCD). A cold trap, composed of isopropanol and liquid
nitrogen, was used to remove water from the gas before the
detector. The quantification of the amount of H2 consumed was
accomplished by integration of the H2-TPR profiles. The H2-TPR
analysis was coupled with mass spectrometry (MS), able to identify,
through the study of m/z signals, the various produced gaseous
molecules at the exit of the reactor.
Nitrogen absorption-desorption measurements were conducted
with a Micromeritics Tristar II Surface Areas and Porosity apparatus.
The specific surface areas were calculated according to the BET
(Brunauer, Emmet and Teller) method, based on the evaluation of
the quantity of physisorbed N2, whereas, pore volume and size
distribution were determined by the BJH (Barrett, Joyner and
ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 1–12
9
© 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
��
These are not the final page numbers!