Paper
RSC Advances
and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand, and
the Cooperative Research Program of Institute for Catalysis,
Hokkaido University. One of the authors (K. G. V.) acknowl-
edges Vidyasirimedhi Institute of Science and Technology
(VISTEC) for the scholarship to his PhD study.
Notes and references
Fig. 7 Photographs of the suspensions of SBA-15–anatase-600 and
ST-01 in aqueous solutions of acetic acid (A) and the suspensions after
the centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 15 min (B). The concentrations of
SBA-15–anatase-600 and ST-01 in the water is 1.5 g L . The
suspension was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min.
1
R. J. White, R. Luque, V. L. Budarin, J. H. Clark and
D. J. Macquarrie, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 481.
K. Ariga, A. Vinu, Y. Yamauchi, Q. Ji and J. P. Hill, Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn., 2011, 25, 1.
ꢁ1
2
3
4
M. Ogawa, J. Photochem. Photobiol., C, 2002, 3, 129.
X. Qian, K. Fuku, Y. Kuwahara, T. Kamegawa, K. Mori and
H. Yamashita, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 1528.
the mesopores suppressed the charge recombination resulted
the high reaction efficiency. The light harvesting to the anatase
nanoparticles is thought to be enhanced by the multiple light
reections in the pore channels. The light scattering may be
difficult to be avoided due to the surface roughness of the SBA-
52
5 Y. Kuwahara and H. Yamashita, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21,
407.
6
7
2
K. Mori, H. Yamashita and M. Anpo, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 3165.
K. G. Vibulyaseak, S. B. Deepracha and M. Ogawa, J. Solid
State Chem., 2019, 270, 162.
X. Wang, W. Lian, X. Fu, J. M. Basset and F. Lefebvre, J.
Catal., 2006, 238, 13.
15 particles seen in the SEM image (Fig. 2(B)). Irrespective of the
negative aspects, the hybrid was photocatalytically active
comparable to P25, suggesting the high potential of the formed
anatase particles and positive roles of the pores to concentrate
substrates from the solution. In addition, the SBA-15–anatase
samples was easily collected from the suspension by centrifu-
gation as shown in Fig. 7(B) (SBA-15–anatase-600 was used),
compared with the anatase nanoparticle (ST-01), which still
remained in the supernatant.
8
9
S. Zheng, L. Gao, Q. H. Zhang and J. K. Guo, J. Mater. Chem.,
2
000, 10, 723.
0 J. Strunk, W. C. Vining and A. T. Bell, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010,
14, 16937.
1 M. Bandyopadhyay, A. Birkner, M. W. E. Van den Berg,
K. V. Klementiev, W. Schmidt, W. Gr u¨ nert and H. Gies,
Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 3820.
1
1
1
4
Conclusions
12 R. Singh, R. Bapat, L. Qin, H. Feng and V. Polshettiwar, ACS
Catal., 2016, 6, 2770.
The photocatalytic activity of the well-dened anatase particle (5
nm) prepared in mesoporous silica, SBA-15 with the pore size of
1
3 C. Jiang, K. Y. Lee, C. M. Parlett, M. K. Bayazit, C. C. Lau,
Q. Ruan, S. J. Moniz, A. F. Lee and J. Tang, Appl. Catal., A,
6
nm was examined by using the photocatalytic decomposition
of acetic acid as a model reaction. The crystallization of the
anatase particle in the mesoporous silica was examined by
heating from 200 to 600 C, where the mesoporous structure of
2016, 521, 133.
ꢀ
14 R. van Grieken, J. Aguado, M. J. L ´o pez-Mu n˜ oz and
J. Marug ´a n, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2002, 148, 315.
the mesoporous titania–silica hybrids was retained and the size
15 C. L. Peza-Ledesma, L. Escamilla-Perea, R. Nava, B. Pawelec
of the anatase particle (5 nm) was within the BJH pore diameter
and J. L. G. Fierro, Appl. Catal., A, 2010, 375, 37.
16 T. Shindo, N. Koizumi, K. Hatakeyama and T. Ikeuchi, Int. J.
Soc. Mater. Eng. Resour., 2011, 18, 11.
17 M. Besançon, L. Michelin, L. Josien, L. Vidal, K. Assaker,
M. Bonne, B. Lebeau and J. L. Blin, New J. Chem., 2016, 40,
(
6 nm) of the mesoporous silica. The photocatalytic activity of
ꢀ
the titania–silica hybrid heated lower than 300 C was low (3–14
mmol h of carbon-dioxide production), while the titania–silica
hybrid heated over 400 C gave the high reaction efficiency (45–
5
ꢁ
1
ꢀ
ꢁ1
5 mmol h of carbon-dioxide production), where the reaction
4
386.
efficiency better than the commercial titania nanoparticles (10–
ꢁ
1
1
1
2
2
8 J. Yang, J. Zhang, L. Zhu, S. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Tang, Y. Zhu
and Y. Li, J. Hazard. Mater., 2006, 137, 952.
9 D. R. Sahu, L. Y. Hong, S. C. Wang and J. L. Huang,
Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2009, 117, 640.
0 C. Liu, X. Lin, Y. Li, P. Xu, M. Li and F. Chen, Mater. Res.
Bull., 2016, 75, 25.
53 mmol h of carbon-dioxide production). Further study on
the photocatalytic activities of the titania–silica hybrid as well as
the anatase particles isolated from the template are being done
in our laboratory.
Conflicts of interest
1 M. Bonne, S. Pronier, Y. Batonneau, F. Can, X. Courtois,
S. Royer, P. Mar ´e cot and D. Duprez, J. Mater. Chem., 2010,
There are no conicts to declare.
20, 9205.
2
2 D. Zhao, Q. Huo, J. Feng, B. F. Chmelka and G. D. Stucky, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 6024.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Research Chair Grant 2017 23 K. Vibulyaseak, S. Bureekaew and M. Ogawa, Langmuir, 2017,
grant number FDA-CO-2560-5655) from the National Science 33, 13598.
(
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 32350–32356 | 32355