350
Q. Gao, J. Wang / Chemical Physics Letters 391 (2004) 349–353
from 75% acetone–water solution in the temperature
range between )20 and 30 °C reaching a purity >99%
when determined by the iodometric titration. Perchloric
acid, thiourea and sodium carbonate were reagent grade
and were used without further purification. Solutions
were all prepared on daily basis by dissolving proper
amounts of reactants in the deionized water (ultrafil-
tered from Milli-Q (Millipore) system). All experiments
presented here were conducted in a continuous flow
stirred tank reactor (CSTR) thermostated through a
circulating water bath. The Plexiglas reactor has a vol-
ume of 28 ml. Solutions of sodium chlorite, thiourea and
perchloric acid were separately transferred to the reactor
by an ISMATIC high precision peristaltic pump (Swit-
zerland). The pH and Pt potential were simultaneously
followed with a glass electrode and a platinum electrode,
respectively, coupled with a HgjHg2SO4jK2SO4 refer-
ence electrode. Signals from the reaction were recorded
by an IBM PC through a Powerlab/4sp (ADInstru-
ments, Australia).
flow mixture into the barium chloride solution where
precipitations took place due to the presence of sulfate
ions. Such an observation is consistent with recent
studies done by Simoyi [8] and by Margerum [15], which
illustrated, respectively, that the oxidation of thiourea
produced oxysulfur(IV) compounds and the reaction of
chlorite and S(IV) was auto-catalyzed by hydrogen ions.
The above investigation, together with existing liter-
ature [6–8,16], suggest that the observed pH oscillations
arise from sulfur(-II) oxidations, where the increase and
decrease in the pH are resulted from S(-II) to S(0) and
from S(0) to S(VI), respectively. To maintain the oscil-
latory cycle, however, proper reaction conditions in-
cluding the background pH value, flow rates, and
[NaClO ]/[SC(NH ) ] ratio must be satisfied. Qualita-
2
2 2
tively, variations in the pH of the reaction solution
could be accounted based on the following three steps:
þ
ꢀ
1. H +ClO +SC(NH2)2 !HOCl+HOSC(NH)(NH2)
2
ꢀ
2ꢀ
+
4
2. H2O + HOCl + ClO + HOSC(NH)(NH2) ! SO
2
2Cl + OC(NH2)2 + 3H
ꢀ
þ
þ
þ
3
. OC(NH2)2 + H2O + 2H ! 2NH + CO2
4
Reactions 1 and 3 shall cause an increase in the pH
þ
via directly consuming H or producing a weaker acid.
To induce the decrease in pH, process 2 produces
3
. Results and discussion
þ
þ
H
via an autocatalytic cycle catalyzed by H . The
Fig. 1 presents a time series of pH oscillations ob-
production of the sulfenyl acid has been found to be
autocatalytic through the formation of dithiobisform-
amidine [6]. The overall stoichiometric reaction can be
expressed as:
tained in the non-buffered chlorite–thiourea reaction.
Here, the system oscillates between pH 2.5 and 2.8, in-
dicating that variations in the concentration of hydro-
gen ions are at the order of 10 3 M. Such a magnitude is
significantly larger than those reported in most of the
sulfur-containing oscillators [12]. Note that keeping the
pH of the reaction mixture below 3.0, a condition close
to the pKa of HClO2 [14], is desired here because Cl(-III)
is found to exhibit stronger oxidation ability under such
an environment. A sharp drop in the pH, a character-
istic of autocatalytic reactions, was found to be ac-
companied by the rapid production of sulfate ions,
which was identified by immediately injecting the out-
ꢀ
ꢀ
2
2ClO þ SCðNH Þ þ 2H O
2
2
2
2ꢀ
ꢀ
þ
¼
SO þ 2Cl þ 2NH þ CO
2
4
4
þ
Despite the production of NH –NH and H CO –
3
2
3
4
HCO pairs, which consequently function as buffers to
ꢀ
3
minimize modulations in the concentration of hydrogen
ions, pH oscillations in the magnitude of 0.01–0.3 have
been recorded over a broad range of reaction condi-
tions. Variations in the reaction behavior with respect
to the change of flow rate are presented in Fig. 2. The
time series presented here were recorded through a
platinum electrode. These Pt potential oscillations are
anti-phased to the corresponding pH oscillations. Such
an anti-phased relationship between the pH oscillations
and oscillations in the Pt potential is the same as ob-
served in a batch reactor [16]. In Fig. 2, the following
2
2
2
.9
.7
.5
sequence could be identified: Period-1 (a) ! Period-2
2
(
(
b) ! Period-4 (c) ! Period-8 (d) ! chaos (e) ! 1
3 n
f) ! 1 (g) ! 1 (h), where the superscript indicates the
0
1000
2000
total number of small peaks per cycle. As the flow rate
is increased from (a) to (h), the system exhibits transi-
tions from period-doubling to homoclinic bifurcations.
When the flow rate is increased further, the system
evolves to a non-oscillatory steady state. A summary of
the bifurcation diagram as a function of the flow rate is
presented in Fig. 3.
time/s
Fig. 1. Time series of pH oscillations in the chlorite–thiourea reaction
ꢀ1
conducted in a CSTR. The flow rate equals 8.93 ꢁ 10ꢀ
3
s and the
reaction temperature is 45 °C. Initial concentrations of the reaction
ꢀ3
ꢀ3
mixture are [NaClO2]0 ¼ 2.0 ꢁ 10
mol/l, [SC(NH2)2]0 ¼ 1.5 ꢁ 10
mol/l, and [HClO4]0 ¼ 6.0 ꢁ 10ꢀ mol/l.
4