C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
511.8), [(CO2)(SiMo11O38)(CO2)(SiMo11O39)H6]4- (calcd m/z )
902.6), and [(CO2)SiMo11CoO38(CO2)H2]2- (calcd m/z ) 919.8)
for 2. These results also suggest the occurrence of a C-O bond
break in the polymeric chains.23
The successful syntheses of 1 and 2 provide a promising route
to capture CO2 by simple inorganic polyoxoanions in aqueous
medium. The linear pattern of the CO2 ligand in 1 and 2 should
become a significant structural and functional model for catalytic
conversion of CO2 into useful chemicals. In particular, most of the
current CO2 reactions depend on organic solvent.24 Thus, 1 and 2
represent a green chemical approach to CO2 coordination chemistry.
Acknowledgment. The authors are thankful for the financial
supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(Grant No. 20671017; 20731002) and the Specialized Research
Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, structural
figures, IR, UV-vis, NMR, XPS, ESI-MS spectra, and crystallographic
data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Falkowski, P.; Scholes, R. J.; Boyle, E.; Canadell, J.; Canfield, D.; Elser,
J.; Gruber, N.; Hibbard, K.; Ho¨gberg, P.; Linder, S.; Mackenzie, F. T.;
Moore, B.; Pedersen, T., III; Rosenthal, Y.; Seitzinger, S.; Smetacek, V.;
Steffen, W. Science 2000, 290, 291–296.
(2) Petersena, G.; Viviani, D.; Magrini-Bair, K.; Kelley, S.; Moens, L.;
Shepherd, P.; DuBois, D. Sci. Total EnViron. 2005, 338, 159–182.
(3) Baines, S. J.; Worden, R. H. Geol. Soc. London, Special Publications 2004,
233, 1–6.
Figure 2. CV curves of 1.0 × 10-3 mol/L 1 and 2 in DMF solution using
(a) 0.1 mol/L Bu4NClO4 and (b) addition of 30% (v/v) pH ) 1.0 H2SO4
aqueous solution as electrolytes (scan rate 50 mV/s vs SCE).
for 1 and 2105 cm-1 for 2), evidently resulting from an axial
Vas(OCO) vibrational mode. The electronic spectra of 1 and 2 display
characteristic bands at 212 nm [pπ (Oterminal) f dπ* (Mo) transitions]
and 562 nm (d-d transitions of Co2+) as shown in Figure S4. Such
bands are very close to the reported values 214 and 565 nm for
(n-Bu4N)4HPMo11CoII(L)O39 (L ) H2O or pyridine) complexes.20
In 13C NMR spectra, the chemical shift (δ) for carbon atoms of
CO2 are 113.86 ppm for 1 and 112.50 ppm for 2 (Figure S5),
appearing in distinct upfield shifts relative to free CO2 at 125.8
ppm.21 Further, the intensities of such resonances clearly increase
when 1 and 2 are prepared using 13CO2 (Figure S5).
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of 1 and 2 indicate a quasi-
reversible one-electron Co3+/Co2+ redox process with ∆Ep of 155
and 156 mV, respectively (Figure 2a). The couloumetric detection
confirmed the electron transfer number of 0.93 and 0.95 for the
reduced processes of 1 and 2, respectively. The Co3+/Co2+ redox
couples disappeared in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF)/H2SO4 (pH
) 1.0) mixed solvent (Figure 2b), suggesting that 1 and 2 are stable
in organic solvent but easily transformed into the absent-Co2+
Keggin-type structures by acidification.22 When the solid samples
of 1 or 2 were dissolved in H2SO4 aqueous solution (pH ) 0.5),
CO2 bubbles could be observed. By the gas chromatographic
analysis (Figure S6), the generated CO2 in 1 and 2 (1, 1.692%; 2,
1.715%) are close to the calculated values (1, 1.815%; 2, 1.816%).
This result strongly demonstrates the existence of CO2 ligands in
the two compounds and indicates the structural decomposition of
1 or 2 in acidic solution. Thus, a quantifiable control of CO2 release
could be performed by the dissolution of 1 or 2 in acidic solution.
The electrospray ion mass spectra in the negative mode for 1
and 2 present several peaks in the region m/z ) 200-1000 (Figure
S7). These peaks at m/z ) 456.2 and 512.6 for 1 and 512.1, 901.8,
and 921.3 for 2 indicated the presence of CO2-bearing ion clusters
[(PMo11CoO39)2(CO2)(Him)H]8- (calcd m/z ) 456.7; Him )
protonated imidazole) and [(PMo11CoO39)2(CO2)H3]7- (calcd m/z
) 512.2) for 1 and [(SiMo11CoO39)2(CO2)H5]7- (calcd m/z )
(4) Wells, S. L.; DeSimone, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 518–527.
(5) Yin, X.; Moss, J. R. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1999, 181, 27–59.
(6) Gibson, D. H. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 2063–2096.
(7) Contreras, L.; Paneque, M.; Sellin, M.; Carmona, E.; Pedro, J.; Gutie´rrez-
Puebla, E.; Monge, A.; Ruiz, C. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 109–115.
(8) Castro-Rodriguez, I.; Nakai, H.; Zakharov, L. N.; Rheingold, A. L.; Meyer,
K. Science 2004, 305, 1757–1759.
(9) Lee, C. H.; Laitar, D. S.; Mueller, P.; Sadighi, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 13802–13803.
(10) Hill, C. L. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 1–2.
(11) Long, D.; Burkholder, E.; Cronin, L. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 105–121.
(12) Yamase, T. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 307–326.
(13) Lisnard, L.; Mialane, P.; Dolbecq, A.; Marrot, J.; Clemente-Juan, J. M.;
Coronado, E.; Keita, B.; de Oliveira, P.; Nadjo, L.; Se´cheresse, F.
Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13, 3525–3536.
(14) Manos, M. J.; Keramidas, A. D.; Woollins, J. D.; Z. Slawin, A. M.; Kabanos,
T. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001, 3419–3420.
(15) Bergwerff, J. A.; van de Water, L. G. A.; Visser, T.; de Peinder, P.; Leliveld,
B. R. G.; de Jong, K. P.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11,
4591–4601.
(16) Experimental details are available as Supporting Information. Complex 1
can be prepared typically by the following procedure: Co(CH3COO)2 ·4H2O
(0.4 mmol), Na2MoO4 · 2H2O (4.4 mmol), Na2HPO4 · 12H2O (0.4 mmol),
and C3H4N2 (1.8 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of distilled water. After
the pH was adjusted to 3.5 by 4 mol · L-1 HCl, an excess of CO2 was
bubbled through the stirred red mixture for 4 h. The resulting filtrate was
transferred into a beaker of 50 mL. Evaporation of the solvent at room
temperature generates the crystals of 1 (yield 33% based on Mo).
(17) Data collection were performed at 293(2) K on a Bruker SMART APEX(II)
diffractometer with a charge-coupled device (CCD) area detector, with
graphite-monochromated Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.710 73). Molecular
structures were solved by direct methods and refined on F2 by full-matrix
least-squares techniques. For 1: Orthorhombic, Fmmm, a ) 13.055(1), b
) 21.179(2) Å, c ) 21.966(2) Å, V ) 6073.4(9) Å3, Z ) 4, R1 ) 0.0466
and wR2 ) 0.1097 for all data. For 2: Orthorhombic, Fmmm, a ) 13.039(1)
Å, b ) 21.333(2) Å, c ) 21.889(2) Å, V ) 6088.7(9) Å3, Z ) 4, R1 )
0.0621 and wR2 ) 0.1383 for all data. CCDC number (1, 669695; 2,
669696).
(18) Zhang, G.; Chen, Z.; He, T.; Ke, H.; Ma, Y.; Shao, K.; Yang, W.; Yao, J.
J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 6944–6948.
(19) Bessel, C. A.; Rolison, D. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 1148–1157.
(20) Combs-Walker, L. A.; Hill, C. L. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 4016–4026.
(21) Schlo¨rer, N. E.; Berger, S. Organometallics 2001, 20, 1703–1704.
(22) Sadakane, M.; Steckhan, E. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 219–238.
(23) Castro-Rodriguez, I.; Meyer, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11242–
11243.
(24) Sakakura, T.; Choi, J. C.; Yasuda, H. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 2365–2387.
JA801560T
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 33, 2008 10839