OXIDATION OF GLY-GLY BY SODIUM N-CHLORO-P-TOLUENESULFONAMIDE
versa. From the inspection of rate constants and the values of
energy of activation (Table 4), the relative reactivity of these
catalysts during the oxidation of Gly-Gly by CAT in alkaline
medium is in the order: Os(VIII) > Ru(III) > Pt(IV) > Pd(II). This may
be attributed to the d-electronic configuration of the metal ions.
acts as efficient catalysts in the oxidation of Gly-Gly brought
about by CAT in alkaline medium.
0
Acknowledgements
Osmium having d electronic configuration has greater catalytic
efficiency to oxidise the substrate compared to the other metal
ions used in the present study. Thus, the catalytic efficiency
decreases as the number of electrons in the d-orbital increases.
We gratefully acknowledge the UGC-DRS programme of our
Department for the encouragement and highly thankful to
Professor B. S. Sheshadri and Professor N. M. Nanje Gowda for
their helpful discussions.
8
Pd(II) having d electronic configuration is expected to have least
catalytic efficiency among the catalysts used. It is likely that
during the course of the reaction the metal ion momentarily
undergo reduction when the oxidant/oxidant-substrate complex
is attached to the metal ions and after this the metal ion gets back
to its original valence state as shown in Schemes 1–4. Ru(III) and
REFERENCES
5
6
Pt(IV) having d and d electronic configuration, respectively,
exhibit intermediate catalytic efficiency in the present study.
Hence, based on d-electronic configuration of the metal ions, the
reactivity decreases as the number of electrons increases in the
d-orbital as d (Os(VIII)) > d (Ru(III)) > d Pt(IV) > d (Pd(II)).
Consequently, the observed catalytic trend: Os(VIII) > Ru(III) >
Pt(IV) > Pd(II) is based on the d-electronic configuration of the
metal ions.
[1] M. M. Campbell, G. Johnson, Chem. Rev. 1978, 78, 65.
[2] E. Bishop, V. J. Jennings, Talanta 1958, 1, 197.
[
3] J. C. Morris, J. A. Salazar, M. A. Winemann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70,
036.
4] K. K. Banerji, B. Jayaram, D. S. Mahadevappa, J. Sci. Ind. Res. 1987, 46,
5.
2
[
0
5
6
8
6
[5] D. H. Bremner, Synth. Reagents 1985, 6, 9.
[6] G. Agnihotri, Synlett, 2005, 18, 2857.
[
7] S. Akabori, K. Narita, K Toki, H. Hanafusa, Nippon Kagaku Zasshi (J.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. Pure Chem. Sec.) 1954, 75, 782.
8] E. F. Hammel, S. Glasstone, J. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 3741.
9] D. K. Bhat, B. S. Sherigara, B. T. Gowda, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69,
41.
Furthermore, efforts were made to compare the main salient
features of the kinetic data of this paper with the results
[
[
[
64]
reported for the oxidation of glycine (monomer of gly-gly) by
CAT in alkaline medium. Gowda and Mahadevappa have reported
the kinetics of oxidation of several amino acids by CAT in both
[
10] T. A. Iyenger, D. S. Mahadevappa, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Chem. Sci.
1993, 105, 63.
[
[
11] Puttaswamy, N. Vaz, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2003, 76, 73.
12] K. R. Bhat, K. Jyothi, B. T. Gowda, Oxid. Commun. 2002, 25, 117 and
references therein.
[13] F. A. Cotton, G. Wilkinson, C. A. Murillo, M. Bochmann, Advanced
Inorganic Chemistry, 6th edn, John Wiley and Sons Inc:, New York,
1999.
[
64]
acid and alkaline media.
Rate of oxidation of glycine shows
first-order dependence each in [CAT]
fractional-order in [OH ]. But in the present investigation, the
0
and [Glyine]0, and inverse
ꢀ
oxidation of gly-gly exhibits a first-order kinetics in [CAT]
fractional-order in [OH ] for all the four catalysed reactions,
0
and
ꢀ
[
14] W. P. Griffith, The Chemistry of Rare Platinum Metals, InterScience, New
whereas zero and fractional-order in [gly-gly] , and first and
0
York, 1967.
fractional order in [catalyst] for various catalysed reactions
studied. The stoichiometry of the reaction was found to be 1:2 for
[15] G. Akerloff, J. Chem. Soc. 1932, 54, 4125.
[
16] F. Feigl, Spot Tests in Organic Analysis, 7th edn, Elsevier, Amsterdam,
966. 132, 195.
1
both glycine and gly-gly. It was also found that the E ¼ 108 and
a
[17] A. I. Vogel, Text Book of Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th edn, ELBS and
Longman, London, 1989. 1332, 1286.
ꢀ1
[64]
6
2.0 kJ mol for gly-gly (Table 4) and glycine,
respectively,
revealed that the reaction is faster in glycine compared to gly-gly.
This can be attributed to the involvement of different oxidising
[18] Puttaswamy, R. V. Jagadeesh, Appl. Catal. A: General 2005, 292, 259.
[19] F. F. Hardy, J. P. Johnston, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. II 1973, 742.
[20] B. G. Pryde, F. G. Soper, J. Chem. Soc. 1962, 1582.
ꢀ
species TsNHCl and HOCl in the oxidation of glycine, and TsNCl
in the case of gly-gly. The facts presented above compel us to
conclude that the present study in many respects differ from the
[21] B. G. Pryde, F. G. Soper, J. Chem. Soc. 1931, 1510.
[22] T. Higuchi, K. Ikeda, A. Hussain, J. Chem. Soc. B 1967, 546.
[23] T. Higuchi, K. Ikeda, A. Hussain, J. Chem. Soc. A 1968, 1031 and
references therein.
[
64]
reported studies that is the kinetics of oxidation of glycine by
CAT in alkaline medium.
[24] H. S. Singh, R. K. Singh, S. M. Singh, A. K. Slsodla, J. Phys. Chem. 1977,
8
1(11), 1044.
25] D. C. Bilehal, R. M. Kulkarni, S. T. Nandibewoor, Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79,
926.
[26] R. T. Mahesh, M. B. Bellaki, S. T. Nandibewoor, Cat. Lett. 2004, 97(1–2),
1.
[
1
CONCLUSIONS
9
[
[
27] A. M. Balado, B. C. Galan, F. J. P. Martin, Anal. Quim. 1992, 88, 170.
28] P. S. Radhakrishnamurthy, H. P. Panda, Bull. Soc. Kinet. Ind. 1980, 2(1),
The kinetic patterns of Ru(III)/Os(VIII)/Pd(II)/Pt(IV)-catalysed
oxidation of Gly-Gly by CAT in NaOH medium were found to
be different and the catalytic efficiency of these platinum group
metal ions increases in the order: Os(VIII) > Ru(III) > Pt(IV) > Pd(II).
This trend may be attributed to different d-electronic configur-
ation of the catalysts. Further, the rates of oxidation of Gly-Gly for
all the catalysed reactions have been compared with uncatalysed
reaction and found that the catalysed reactions are 7- to 24-fold
faster. Catalytic constants and activation parameters with
reference to each catalyst have been computed. Based on the
observed experimental results, detailed mechanistic interpret-
ation and the related kinetic modelling have been worked out for
each catalyst. It can be concluded that Ru(III)/Os(VIII)/Pd(II)/Pt(IV)
6.
[
29] D. L. Kamble, S. T. Nadibewoor, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1998, 11, 171.
[30] C. P. Kathari, R. M. Mulla, S. T. Nandibewoor, Oxid. Commun. 2005,
8(3), 579.
[
2
31] S. A. Chimatdar, T. Basavaraj, S. T. Nandibewoor, Inorg. React. Mech-
anism 2002, 4(3–4), 209.
32] M. Ardon, J. Chem. Soc. 1957, 1811.
[
[33] N. Kambo, S. K. Upadhyay, Indian J. Chem. 2004, 43A, 1210.
[34] C. J. Collins, N. S. Bowmann, Isotope Effects in Chemical Reactions, Van
Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1970, 267.
[
[
[
35] K. B. Wiberg, Chem. Rev. 1955, 55, 713.
36] K. B. Wiberg, Physical Organic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1964.
37] K. J. Laidler, Chemical Kinetics, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.
219–222.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2008, 21 844–858
Copyright ß 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/poc