6
952 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 114, No. 20, 2010
Pai et al.
proceed spontaneously and the adsorbed oxygen generated in
the process is driven away by a gas phase CO or adsorbed CO.
Thus, in LF(0.6)GC, the carbonate formation assists the reduc-
(4) Yan, L.; Zhang, X.; Ren, T.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X; Suo, J. Chem.
Commun. 2002, 8, 860–862.
(
5) Centi, G.; Galli, A.; Montanari, B.; Perathoner, S.; Vaccari, A.
Catal. Today 1997, 35, 113–120.
2
tion of preadsorbed N O, while in the case of LTO, the absence
(6) Debbagh Bouttarbouch, M. N.; Garcia Cortes, J. M.; Soussi El
Begrani, M; Salinas Martinez de Lecea, C.; Perez-Ramirez, J. Appl. Catal.,
B 2004, 54, 115–123.
of carbonate makes the reaction progress sluggishly. The
proposed mechanism is essentially a redox phenomenon, where
the surface is initially reduced by CO and then the reduced
(
7) Delahay, G.; Mauvezin, M.; Guzman-Vargas, A.; Coq, B. Catal.
Commun. 2002, 3, 385–389.
surface is oxidized by dissociative N
catalytic activity data exactly corroborate the in situ FTIR results
where we find that for the CO + N O reaction, the LF(0.6)GC
sample shows the highest activity. However, on LTOGC, CO
cannot activate the surface for any dissociative chemisorptions
2
O chemisorption. The
(8) Doi, K.; Wu, Y. Y.; Takeda, R.; Matsunami, A.; Arai, N.; Tagawa,
T.; Goto, S. Appl. Catal., B 2001, 35, 43–51.
(
9) Yan, L.; Ren, T.; Wang, X.; Gao, Q.; Ji, D.; Suo, J. Catal. Commun.
2
2
003, 4, 505–509.
(10) Haber, J.; Machej, T.; Janas, J.; Nattich, M. Catal. Today 2004,
9
0, 15–19.
(11) Armor, J. N.; Braymer, T. A.; Farris, T. S.; Li, Y.; Petrocelli, F. P.;
2
of N O. This incapability is probably due to a stoichiometric
Weist, E. L.; Kannan, S.; Swamy, C. S. Appl. Catal., B 1996, 7, 397–406.
surface resulting in weak physisorption of CO, and poor lattice
oxygen diffusion does not lead to any carbonate formation.
Furthermore, a stoichiometric oxygen excess titanate will not
(
12) Winter, E. R. S. J. Catal. 1974, 34, 431–439.
(13) Satsuma, A.; Maeshima, H.; Watanabe, K.; Suzuki, K.; Hattori, T.
Catal. Today 2000, 63, 347–353.
(
14) Wang, J.; Yasuda, H.; Inumaru, K.; Misono, M. Bull. Chem. Soc.
in any way facilitate dissociative chemisorptions of N
is no vacancy in the surface to accommodate another oxygen
atom. Thus, the reduction of N O with CO over LTOGC
proceeds via an associative mechanism (Scheme 3).
2
O, as there
Jpn. 1995, 684, 1226–1231.
(15) Chellam, U.; Xu, Z. P.; Zeng, H. C. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 650–
58.
6
2
(
16) Yan, L.; Ren, T.; Wang, X.; Ji, D.; Suo, J. Appl. Catal., B 2003,
4
5, 85–90.
(
17) Dacquin, J. P.; Dujardin, C.; Granger, P. J. Catal. 2008, 253, 37–
4
. Conclusion
49.
(
18) Abu-Zied, B. M.; Schwieger, W.; Unger, A. Appl. Catal., B 2008,
4, 277–288.
(19) Cheng, H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, A.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, T. Appl.
Catal., B 2009, 89, 391–397.
20) Pomonis, P.; Vatts, D.; Lycourghiotis, A.; Kordulis, C. J. Chem.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work of its
8
kind on the crystalline iron-substituted lanthanum titanates,
La 7-δ, using in situ FTIR spectroscopy to investi-
gate the surface species and to predict the most probable
mechanism involved in the vapor phase catalytic reduction of
2
Ti2(1-x)Fe2xO
(
Soc. Faraday Trans. 1985, 1, 81–2043.
(21) Ladavos, A. K.; Pomonis, P. J. Appl. Catal., B 1993, 2, 27–47.
(
(
22) Christopher, J.; Swamy, C. S. J. Mol. Catal. 1990, 62, 69–78.
23) Nitadory, T.; Kurihara, S.; Misono, M. J. Catal. 1986, 98, 221–
N
2
O by CO in conjunction with catalytic activity under similar
conditions. The present study concludes that the catalytic
properties of La Ti , unsubstituted phase, were considerably
enhanced by partially substituting Fe at the B-site in place of
2
28.
24) Nakamura, T.; Misono, M.; Yonedo, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982,
55, 394.
(25) Belapurkar, A. D.; Gupta, N. M.; Phatak, G. M; Iyer, R. M. J.
Mol. Catal. 1994, 87, 287–295.
26) Garrone, E.; Zecchina, A.; Stone, F. S. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday
Trans. 1988, 1, 84, 2843–2854.
27) Carabineiro, S. A. C.; van Noort, W. D.; Nieuwenhuys, B. E. Catal.
Lett. 2002, 84, 135.
2
2 7
O
(
3
+
4+
2 7-δ
Ti . Among all, samples with the composition La Ti0.8Fe1.2O
[
LF(0.6)GC], prepared by a gel combustion route, have shown
(
2
maximum activity for the CO + N O reaction. The catalytic
(
activity data exactly corroborate the in situ FTIR results recorded
under similar conditions. The anionic vacancies/defects or pores
generated in Fe-substituted samples provide additional surface
(
28) de Rossi, S.; Ferraris, G.; Mancini, R. Appl. Catal. 1988, 38, 359–
64.
(29) P e´ rez-Ram ´ı rez, J.; Kondratenko, E. V.; Debbagh, M. N. J. Catal.
005, 233, 442–452.
3
active sites for chemisorption of CO and N
also are active sites for dissociative chemisorptions of N
CO binds to two surface oxygen-forming carbonates at the same
time, reducing the cation, and this process is also facilitated in
the iron-substituted sample due to the presence of more reducible
2
O adsorption and
O. The
2
2
(
(
30) Dandekar, A.; Vannice, M. A. Appl. Catal., B 1999, 22, 179–200.
31) Sadhankar, R. R.; Ye, J.; Lynch, D. T. J. Catal. 1994, 146, 511–
522.
(32) Sadhankar, R. S.; Lynch, D. T. J. Catal. 1994, 149, 278–291.
3+
(33) Granger, P.; Malfoy, P.; Esteves, P.; Leclerq, L.; Leclerq, G. J.
Catal. 1999, 187, 321–331.
2 2 7
cation Fe . Pristine lanthanum titanate, La Ti O , lacks such
sites on the stoichiometric surface, leading to physisorption of
reactants; therefore, no carbonate formation was observed.
Investigations by in situ FTIR reveal that both the position and
the intensity of product CO
with the enhanced intensities of the carbonate species and also
the reduced intensity of the adsorbed N O on the LF(0.6)GC
sample. The proposed mechanism is essentially a redox
phenomenon, where the surface is initially reduced by CO, and
then, the reduced surface is oxidized by dissociative N
chemisorption as against an associative mechanism observed
in unsubstituted sample, La Ti
(
34) McCabe, R.; Wong, C. H. J. Catal. 1990, 121, 422–431.
(35) Tanaka, K.; Blyholder, G. J. Phys. Chem. 1972, 76, 1807–1814.
36) Pacultov a´ , K.; Obalov a´ , L.; Kovanda, F.; Jir a´ tov a´ , K. Catal. Today
008, 137, 385–389.
(
2
2
band correlate exceptionally well
(
37) Pai, M. R.; Wani, B. N.; Gupta, N. M. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 2002,
21, 1187–1190.
(38) Pai, M. R.; Wani, B. N.; Shreedhar, B.; Singh, S.; Gupta, N. M. J.
Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 246, 128–135.
2
(39) Pai, M. R.; Banerjee, A. M.; Bharadwaj, S. R.; Kulshreshtha, S. K.
J. Mater. Res. 2007, 22, 1787–1796.
(40) Kartha, K.; Pai, M. R.; Banerjee, A. M.; Pai, R. V.; Meena, S. S.;
Bharadwaj, S. R. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. Communicated.
2
O
(
41) Kamble, V. S.; Gupta, N. M.; Kartha, V. B.; Iyer, R. M. J. Chem.
Soc. Faraday Trans. I 1993, 89, 1143–1150.
42) Hollins, P. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1992, 16, 51–94.
2
2 7
O .
(
Acknowledgment. We thank Prof. Dr. T. Mukherjee, Direc-
tor, Chemistry Group, and Dr. D. Das, Head, Chemistry
Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India, for
their kind support and encouragement.
(43) Mguig, B.; Calatayud, M.; Minot, C. J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM
004, 709, 73–78.
2
1
1
(
44) Boccuzzi, F.; Chiorino, A.; Subora, S. T.; Haruta, M. J. Phys. Chem.
996, 100, 3625–3631.
45) Matsumura, Y.; Hashimoto, K.; Moffat, J. B. Catal. Lett. 1992,
3, 283–288.
46) Chen-Bin, W.; Chih-Wei, T.; Hsin-Chi, T.; Ming-Chih, K.; Shu-
(
(
References and Notes
Hua, C. Catal. Lett. 2006, 107, 223–230.
(47) Daniells, S. T.; Overweg, A. R.; Makkee, M.; Moulijn, J. A. J.
Catal. 2005, 230, 52–65.
(48) Hussain, G.; Sheppard, N. Spectrochim. Acta 1991, 47A, 1525–
1530.
(
(
(
1) Theimens, M. H.; Trogler, W. C. Science 1991, 251, 932–934.
2) Roy, P. K.; Pirngruber, G. D. J. Catal. 2004, 227, 164–174.
3) Kapteijn, F.; Mirasol, J. R; Moulijn, J. A. Appl. Catal., B 1996, 9,
2
5–64.