◦
2
5
C using a Radiometer PHM82 pH-meter equipped with a
4 E. Yeh, L. J. Cole, E. W. Barr, J. M. Bollinger, D. P. Ballou and C. T.
Walsh, Biochemistry, 2006, 45, 7904–7912.
E. Yeh, L. C. Blasiak, A. Koglin, C. L. Drennan and C. T. Walsh,
GK3401C combined glass electrode. Values of pD were obtained
by adding 0.40 to the observed reading of the pH meter. In
reactions monitored by conventional UV spectroscopy, the pH
was determined at the end of the reaction. In kinetic experiments
involving fast reactions, that were monitored using a stopped-flow
device, the pH was measured for control solutions prepared to be
identical to the solutions used in the stopped-flow experiments.
5
Biochemistry, 2007, 46, 1284–1292.
6 S. J. Klebanoff, J. Leukocyte Biol., 2005, 77, 598–625.
7 F. H. Vaillancourt, E. Yeh, D. A. Vosburg, S. Garneau-Tsodikova and
C. T. Walsh, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 3364–3378.
8
X. L. Armesto, M. Canle, M. V. Garc ´ı a and J. A. Santaballa, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 1998, 27, 453–460.
9 M. P. Snyder and D. W. Margerum, Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 2545–2550.
0 K. Kumar, R. A. Day and D. W. Margerum, Inorg. Chem., 1986, 25,
1
1
1
4
344–4350.
Kinetic studies
1 B. S. Yiin, D. M. Walker and D. W. Margerum, Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26,
3435–3441.
2 J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, P. Calvo, J. Crugeiras and A. Rios, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 2000, 2109–2114.
◦
All reactions were carried out in water at 25 C and I = 0.5
NaClO ). Kinetic experiments always employed at least a 10-fold
(
4
excess of nucleophile over substrate, with iodide ion concentrations
in the range 0.5–5 mM. Reactions with half-times of less than
13 P. Calvo, J. Crugeiras, A. Rios and M. A. Rios, J. Org. Chem., 2007,
2, 3171–3178.
7
1
1
4 P. Calvo, J. Crugeiras and A. Rios, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 5381–5389.
5 J. M. Antelo, E. Arce, J. Campos and M. Parajo, Int. J. Chem. Kinet.,
1996, 28, 391–396.
1
5 s were studied by using the DX17MV stopped-flow device
from Applied Photophysics. An aqueous solution of the substrate
and a buffered solution of the nucleophile were mixed in a ratio
16 J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, J. Crugeiras, C. Miraz and M. Parajo, Gazz.
Chim. Ital., 1997, 127, 355–360.
-
5
of 1 : 1 to give a final reaction mixture containing 2 ¥ 10
M
1
1
7 J. R. Keeffe and A. J. Kresge, Tech. Chem. (N. Y.), 1986, 6, 747–790.
8 I. Weil and J. C. Morris, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1949, 71, 3123–3126.
substrate. The reactions were monitored by following the increase
-
in absorbance at 287 nm due to the appearance of I
3
. The slower
19 J. M. Antelo, F. Arce, J. Franco, M. Sanchez and A. Varela, Bull. Soc.
Chim. Belg., 1989, 98, 85–89.
reactions of 3 were monitored at 270 nm using a conventional
UV spectrophotometer and were initiated by making a 100-fold
dilution of a solution of substrate into the reaction mixture to give
2
2
2
0 W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, 94, 4731–4732.
1 W. P. Jencks, Acc. Chem. Res., 1976, 9, 425–432.
2 C. W. Davies, Ion Association, Butterworth & Co., London, 1962.
-
5
a final concentration of 2 ¥ 10 M. First-order rate constants,
23 W. P. Jencks, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1981, 10, 345–375.
24 E. T. Gray, Jr., D. W. Margerum and R. P. Huffman, ACS Symp. Ser.,
-
1
k
obsd (s ), were determined from the fit of the absorbance data to
1
979, 82, 264–277.
5 The pK for 2-H is estimated from pK
the assumption that the introduction of a chlorine atom at nitrogen
causes the same 9-unit decrease on this pK as for chlorine substitution
a single-exponential function and were reproducible to ±5%.
+
2
a
a
= 5.8 for CF
3
CH
2
NH
3
with
a
Acknowledgements
+
+
at CH
3
NH
3
(pK
a
= 10.9) to give CH
3
NH
2
Cl (pK = 1.6).
a
2
6 P. M. Laughton and R. E. Robertson, in Solute–Solvent Interactions,
ed. J. F. Coetzee and C. D. Ritchie, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1969,
pp. 399–538.
This research was supported by a grant from the Ministerio de
Ciencia y Tecnolog ´ı a (BQU2001-2912).
2
2
7 R. P. Bell, The Proton in Chemistry, Chapman and Hall, London, 1973.
8 The value of 80% was determined from an analysis of the effect of
References
successive chlorine substitution on the pK
of pK = 4.60, 2.65 and 1.03 for acetic acid, chloroacetic acid and
dichloroacetic acid, respectively (ref. 29).
a
of acetic acid using values
a
1
C. L. Hawkins, D. I. Pattison and M. J. Davies, Amino Acids, 2003, 25,
59–274.
2
29 J. C. Fishbein, H. Baum, M. M. Cox and W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem.
2
3
D. I. Pattison and M. J. Davies, Curr. Med. Chem., 2006, 13, 3271–3290.
Soc., 1987, 109, 5790–5800.
30 W. P. Jencks, Chem. Rev., 1972, 72, 705–718.
C. Bergt, X. Fu, N. P. Huq, J. Kao and J. W. Heinecke, J. Biol. Chem.,
2
004, 279, 7856–7866.
31 W. Gottardi and M. Nagl, Arch. Pharm., 2002, 335, 411–421.
4
142 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 4137–4142
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010