Asymmetric synthesis of sultams and sulfonamides via diastereoselective reduction of N-sulfonylimines

Article abstract of DOI:10.1080/10426509608037955

The diastereoselective reduction of both cyclic and acyclic camphor sulfonylimines was investigated. With cyclic camphor sulfonylimines 1, reduction using NaBH₄ in methanol afforded the corresponding camphorsultams 2 in 92-95% yield as single d

Full text of DOI:10.1080/10426509608037955

This article was downloaded by: [McMaster University]
On: 12 March 2015, At: 06:25
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered
office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon and
the Related Elements
Publication details, including instructions for authors and
subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gpss20
ASYMMETRIC SYNTHESIS OF
SULTAMS AND SULFONAMIDES VIA
DIASTEREOSELECTIVE REDUCTION OF
N-SULFONYLIMINES
Franklin A. Davis a , Ping Zhou b & Bang-Chi Chen b
a Department of Chemistry , Temple University , Philadelphia,
PA, 19122-2585, USA
b Department of Chemistry , Drexel University , Philadelphia,
PA, 19104, USA
Published online: 24 Sep 2006.
To cite this article: Franklin A. Davis , Ping Zhou & Bang-Chi Chen (1996) ASYMMETRIC
SYNTHESIS OF SULTAMS AND SULFONAMIDES VIA DIASTEREOSELECTIVE REDUCTION OF N-
SULFONYLIMINES, Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon and the Related Elements, 115:1, 85-91, DOI:
10.1080/10426509608037955
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10426509608037955
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever
or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or
arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms

& Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/
terms-and-conditions