Intramolecular Carbene Cation Radical Formation
A R T I C L E S
Varian Gemini 2000 NMR spectrometer with the proton solvent as a
reference. Elemental analyses were performed by the Atlantic Mi-
croanalytical Laboratory at Norcross, GA, or at Indiana University using
a Perkin-Elmer Series II CHNS/O Analyzer 2400. Infrared spectra were
recorded either as KBr pellets or in a fluorolube mull on a Nicolet
510P spectrophotometer. Cyclic voltammograms and differential pulse
voltammograms were recorded on a BAS CV-50W voltametric
analyzer. A three-electrode assembly utilizing a glassy carbon working
electrode, a platinum auxiliary electrode, and an SCE reference electrode
was employed without the application of IR compensation. Conductivity
measurements were made using a YSI Model 31A conductance bridge
and a YSI Model 3403 conductivity cell (1 cm-1 cell constant).
Electronic absorption spectra were collected on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda
19 UV/VIS/NIR spectrometer at ambient temperature. Low-temperature
electronic spectral measurements were performed in an Oxford Instru-
ments optical cryostat, which was mounted directly inside the spec-
trometer. Fluorescence measurements were obtained with a Perkin-
Elmer LS 50 B luminescence spectrometer equipped with a Hamatatsu
model R2371 PMT. Quantum yields are given for solutions of matched
optical density at the excitation wavelength and are reported relative
to the fluorescence of phenol. All electron paramagnetic resonance
spectra were recorded at X-band (9.5 GHz) on an ESP 300 Bruker
instrument. Typical EPR conditions: microwave power, 10 mW;
modulation amplitude, 2-20 G; modulation frequency, 100 kHz;
receiver gain, (2-5) × 104. EPR spectra were simulated using SimFonia
(Bruker) for organic radicals and a Monte Carlo method for the copper
signals.35,36 Matrix photolyses were performed directly in the EPR cavity
and the optical dewar with a 150 W Hg source coupled via a liquid
light pipe (Oriel # 77557). Photolyses were run with λ g 455 nm, where
the cutoff wavelength was selected using a series of long wavelength
pass filters (345, 420, and 455 nm). Photolyses at λ ) 457 nm and
λ ) 647 nm were performed with Ar+ and Kr+ ion lasers (Coherent
models I-70 and I-300), respectively, using powers of =300 mW. Solid-
state photolyses were performed with a 1000 W Xe lamp and long
pass filters (295, 345, 420, 455 nm) at 20 °C.
redox switch given the recent interest in radical cations derived
from diaryl diazo compounds.17-20
In addition to the chemical reactivity of diazo compounds
with redox active metals, the geometric and electronic structural
characteristics of metals such as paramagnetism, optical absorp-
tion and emission properties, and radioactivity may enhance the
usefulness of these highly reactive agents for applications in
materials science, medicine, and biochemistry. For example,
transient magnetic materials have been prepared from metal-
diazo coordination polymers whose ground-state paramagnetic
signatures can be photochemically modulated by production of
a ligand-localized diradical that couples to the spin on the metal
center.21,22 The importance of metal-ligand radical intermedi-
ates, however, is not restricted to applications in synthesis3 and
materials,23,24 but extends to DNA degradation agents25-27 and
general bioinorganic chemistry28-31 as well. Here, the emerging
role of metal-ligand radical intermediates for storing redox
equivalents during metalloenzyme activity29,32-34 (e.g., galactose
oxidase) further underscores the importance of fundamental
redox active metal-ligand radical chemistry.
Our interests lie in the function of metal ions in the
determination of the fundamental chemical intermediates pro-
duced upon photolysis of metal-diazo compounds with rel-
evance to materials science and bioinorganic chemistry. Toward
these goals, we have synthesized and structurally characterized
the thermally and photochemically labile 9-diazo-4,5-diazafluo-
rene (1) framework and the corresponding Cu(9-diazo-4,5-
diazafluorene)2(NO3)2 compound (2). Comparison of the photo-
chemical reactivities of 1 and 2 using low-temperature electron
paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and electronic absorption spec-
troscopies reveals that the Cu(II) center strongly influences the
electronic structure of the photogenerated radical intermediates.
Synthetic Methods. All synthetic preparations were performed under
ambient oxygen conditions. Reagents were used as received without
further purification, and all solvents used were spectrochemical grade.
The starting material, 4,5-diazafluorenone-9-hydrazone, was synthesized
from the aqueous oxidation of 1,10-phenathroline followed by the
formation of the hydrazone using hydrazine hydrate, according to
literature procedures.37-39 Caution. Diazo compounds are highly
reactiVe and produce copious amounts of N2 gas upon photo- or thermal
decomposition. Although we did not witness the detonation of solid
samples of these compounds, adequate precautions should be taken
when working with them.
Experimental Section
Physical Measurements. Samples were prepared using volumetric
glassware and standard Schlenk and drybox techniques. Solvents were
degassed either by purging with N2 for >1 h or by several freeze-
1
pump thaw cycles. H NMR spectra were collected on a 300 MHz
(17) Ishiguro, K.; Ikeda, M.; Sawaki, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3057-3066.
(18) Bally, T.; Carra, C.; Matzinger, S.; Truttmann, L.; Gerson, F.; Schmidlin,
R.; Platz, M. S.; Admasu, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7011-7019.
(19) Stoub, D. G.; Goodman, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11110-11111.
(20) Bally, T.; Matzinger, S.; Truttman, L.; Platz, M. S.; Admasu, A.; Gerson,
F.; Arnold, A.; Schmidlin, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7007-7008.
(21) Koga, N.; Ishimaru, Y.; Iwamura, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996,
35, 755-757.
Synthesis of 9-Diazo-4,5-diazafluorene (1). 4,5-Diazafluorenone-
9-hydrazone (1.0 g, 5.1 mmol) was oxidized using a basic solution (10
drops of saturated KOH in water) of yellow HgO (1.2 g, 5.5 mmol) in
benzene (200 mL). The solution was stirred overnight at room
temperature and then filtered through glass wool or filter paper to
remove the insoluble Hg waste. The resulting orange solution was
concentrated to a solid and then recrystallized from a mixture of
dichloromethane and pentane at -20 °C. Yield: 52-65%. Anal. Calcd
for C11H6N4: C, 67.71; H, 2.97; N, 24.28. Found: C, 67.73; H, 3.11;
N, 24.32. EI MS m/z: 194.1 (M+), 166.1 (M+ - N2). 1H NMR
(CDCl3): δ ppm 8.72 (dd, 2H, J ) 1.5, 4.7 Hz), 7.91 (dd, 2H, J ) 1.5,
8.0 Hz), 7.39 (dd, 2H, J ) 4.7, 8.0 Hz). Selected IR data (KBr, cm-1):
3040 (w), 2060 (vs), 1718 (w), 1593 (w), 1560 (w), 1545 (w), 1410
(22) Sano, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Koga, N.; Matsuda, K.; Iwamura, H.; Rabu, P.;
Drillon, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8246-8252.
(23) Fujita, W.; Awaga, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3601-3602.
(24) Sakane, A.; Kumada, H.; Karasawa, S.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H. Inorg. Chem.
2000, 39, 2891-2896.
(25) Maurer, T. D.; Kraft, B. J.; Lato, S. M.; Ellington, A. D.; Zaleski, J. M.
Chem. Commun. 2000, 69-70.
(26) Kraft, B. J.; Zaleski, J. M. New J. Chem. 2001, 25, 1281-1289.
(27) Eppley, H. J.; Lato, S. A.; Ellington, A. D.; Zaleski, J. M. Chem. Commun.
1999, 2405-2406.
(28) Itoh, S.; Kumei, H.; Nagatomo, S.; Kitagawa, T.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2165-2175.
(29) Himo, F.; Eriksson, L. A.; Maseras, F.; Siegbahn, P. E. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 8031-8036.
(30) Kimura, S.; Bill, E.; Bothe, E.; Weyhermueller, T.; Wieghardt, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6025-6039.
(31) Penkert, F. N.; Weyhermueller, T.; Bill, E.; Hildebrandt, P.; Lecomte, S.;
Wieghardt, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9663-9673.
(32) Halfen, J. A.; Jazdzewski, B. A.; Mahapatra, S.; Berreau, L. M.; Wilkinson,
E. C.; Que, L. J.; Tolman, W. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8217-
8227.
(35) Neese, F. QCPE Bull. 1995, 15, 5.
(36) Gaffney, B. J.; Silverstone, H. J. In Biological Magnetic Resonance; Reuben,
J., Berliner, J., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1993; Vol. 13, p 1.
(37) Abdel-Wahab; A. A. M.; Ismail, M. T.; Mohamed, O. S.; Durr, H.; Ma, Y.
M. Liebigs Ann./Recl. 1997, 1611-1618.
(33) Wachter, R. M.; Branchaud, B. P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1384, 43-
54.
(38) Arduengo, A. J., III; Dias, H. V. R.; Harlow, R. L.; Kline, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 5530-5534.
(34) Gerfen, G. J.; Bellew, B. F.; Griffin, R. G.; Singel, D. J.; Ekberg, C. A.;
Whittaker, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16739-16748.
(39) Mlochowski, J.; Szulc, Z. Pol. J. Chem. 1983, 57, 33-39.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 2, 2002 273