Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
nides18 often for heteroarene synthesis.19 We speculated that
imidoyl radicals could potentially be generated by a single-
electron oxidation and deprotonation of electron-rich imines,
given that proton-coupled electron-transfer is a known strategy
to activate strong C−H bonds.20 Imines are commonly
activated through a single electron reduction event;21 however,
we postulated if we tune the arene toward an oxidation event,
the imidoyl C−H would be primed for deprotonation. For
example, when considering an analogous system, upon
oxidation of toluene (Ep/2 = 2.36 V vs SCE)22 the resulting
radical cation is an extremely strong π-acid (pKa of −6;
Scheme 1C).23 We aimed to translate this reactivity to imines
via oxidation of the arene activating group followed by
deprotonation of an acidified imidoyl C−H to form imidoyl
radicals.
We first explored the oxidation potential of imines by
condensing adamantylamine on a variety of aldehyde activating
groups. We found 2,4,6-trimethoxybenzaldehyde to be a viable
activating group. Initial conditions gave desired product in a
19% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Switching to a more oxidizing
photocatalyst, [Ir(dF-CF3-ppy)2(dtbbpy)PF6] (PC B; Ir-
(III)*/Ir(II) = 1.21 V vs SCE) leads to an increase in yield
to 46% (entry 2). Trifluorotoluene and 1,2-dichloroethane as
solvents give similar yields, yet DCE is preferred due to
improved photocatalyst solubility. Stoichiometric amount of
TMG as base is tolerated (entry 3); indeed, the reaction works
even in its absence (entry 7; we assume the imine nitrogen is
sufficiently basic to perform the deprotonation), but a
substoichiometric amount is optimal (20 mol %). Further-
more, diluting the reaction results in higher yield of product
(entries 5 and 6 vs optimal conditions). To our delight,
switching to coupling partner 4 provides high yields and
enables access to unnatural γ-quaternary amino acids.
With optimized conditions in hand, we examined the
reaction scope of primary amines (Scheme 2) with adamantyl-
amine-derived substrates affording products in 92% (5) and
75% (6) yields. Acyclic α-3° amines afford the desired product
in high yields (7−9). Small drug molecule phenantramine (10)
and fluorinated derivative (11) demonstrate high reactivity. A
variety of functional groups are well-tolerated forming products
bearing Boc-protected amines (12, 18), ethers (17), esters (13,
14), and protected alcohols (9). A slightly more strained
[2.2.2]-bicycle proceeds in a 57% yield (14). Products bearing
various ring sizes are formed well (12, 13, 15, 16) with more
strained oxetane- and azetidine-derived amines providing
coupling product in 58% (17) and 63% (18) yield.24
We then turned our attention to expanding this method-
ology to a range of electron-deficient olefin coupling partners.
Using the Karady−Beckwith chiral Dha substrate,25 the
reaction proceeds in high diastereoselectivity and 70% yield
(19). Simple acrylates participate in moderate yields (3, 20,
21) and introduction of substitution at the α-carbon leads to
an improved yield (22−26). We hypothesize that substitution
decreases undesired oligomerization of the resulting radical
upon addition into the acrylate, as well as diminishes any group
transfer byproducts.26 Exocyclic acrylates and enones are
coupled in 52% (27) and 70% with 28 isolated as a single
isomer. Vinyl sulfones and methacrylonitrile also form the
desired products (29−30).
We next turned our attention to mechanistic interrogation to
determine the mode of C−N activation and alkyl radical
formation (Scheme 3). In situ LED NMR monitoring suggests
the reaction is first order in the imine and acrylate coupling
partner (Scheme 3B). Based on these findings, we propose that
upon condensation of the primary amine onto the aldehyde
activating group, the redox-active imine successfully quenches
the excited state of the PC B, as evident by Stern−Volmer
quenching studies (Scheme 3C). A proton transfer event forms
the key imidoyl radical intermediate. A subsequent β-scission
liberates the alkyl radical which couples to electron-deficient
olefins. A final reduction and protonation leads to desired
product formation and regenerates the ground state of PC B.
The remaining crucial mechanistic detail to elucidate was
determining the route from imine to imidoyl radical. Spin
density plotting of the imine radical-cation reveals an
appreciable amount of spin density on both the imine nitrogen
and arene carbon (C1; Scheme 3D). This led us to envision
two potential routes to imidoyl radical formation: (1) a
nitrogen radical-cation acting as a hydrogen atom transfer
(HAT) reagent or (2) oxidation of the arene and subsequent
deprotonation of an acidified imidoyl hydrogen. To test the
feasibility of a potential HAT pathway, we conducted a
competition experiment between 34 and 35 (Scheme 3E). The
oxidation of imine 35 (Ep/2 = +1.86 V vs SCE) is well outside
the range of the iridium excited state, yet when comparing
imidoyl C−H bond strength, it is similar to that of 34.
a
Table 1. Optimization and Control Studies
b
entry
deviation
yield (%)
1
2
3
2 equiv 2, 2 equiv K3PO4, PhCF3 (0.1 M), PC A
2 equiv 2, 2 equiv K3PO4, PhCF3 (0.1 M)
1 equiv TMG
19
46
72
54
68
60
40
0
4
2 equiv acrylate
5
0.10 M DCE
6
0.20 M DCE
7
no TMG
8
no 427 nm LEDs
9
no photocatalyst, 427 nm LEDs
no photocatalyst, 75 °C
coupling partner 4
0
10
11
12
0
91
c
coupling partner 4, PC C
55
ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6 (3 mol %), 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine (TMG,
B
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX