7
19
2
0
The optical rotation of the synthetic lactone 12(6S) ([α]
+38.2, c 1.07, MeOH) is closer to that of
+39.5, c 1.15, MeOH) than the corresponding value of the synthetic 12(6R)
+34.7, c 1.32, MeOH), however this evidence is not conclusive. Fortunately, differences between
the H NMR spectra of 12(6S) and 12(6R) are clearly observable, with the former being completely
D
2
0
the natural sample ([α]
D
2
0
(
[α]
D
1
1
2,13
overlapped with that of the authentic sample.
These results were further confirmed by taking NMR
spectra of mixed samples of 12(6S) and 12(6R) with the natural sample, respectively. Therefore, the
natural lactone was unambiguously assigned to be 12(6S).14 Accordingly, the C acyl moiety existing in
9
the quillajasaponins is determined to be the 3-(S), 5-(S)-dihydroxy-6-(S)-methyl-octanoic acid.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the State Science and Technology Committee of China.
References
1
. (a) Morein, B. Nature 1988, 332, 287. (b) Rouhi, A. M. C&EN 1995, September 11, 28. (c) Livingston, P. O.; Ragupathi, G.
Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 1997, 45, 10. (d) Sjölander, A.; Cox, J. C. Advanced Drug Delivery Review 1998, 34, 321.
. (a) Kensil, C. R.; Soltysik, S.; Wheeler, D. A.; Wu, J. Y. In Saponins Used in Traditional and Modern Medicine; Waller,
G. R.; Yamasaki, K., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York and London, 1995; p.165. (b) van Settern, D. C.; van de Werken, G.
In Saponins Used in Traditional and Modern Medicine; Waller, G. R.; Yamasaki, K., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York and
London, 1995; p.185.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
. Higuchi, R.; Komori, T. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 2357.
. Kusumi, T.; Ohtani, I.; Inouye, Y.; Kakisawa, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 4731.
. Oka, T.; Murai, A. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 1.
. Gao, Y.; Hanson, R. M.; Klunder, J. M.; Ko, S. Y.; Masamune, H.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5765.
. Ma, P.; Martin, V. S.; Masamune, S.; Sharpless, K. B.; Viti, S. M. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1378.
. (a) Roush, W. R.; Ando, K.; Powers, D. B.; Palkowitz, A. D.; Halterman, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6339. (b)
Roush, W. R.; Palkowitz, A. D.; Ando, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6348.
9
. Here we assumed that the stereochemistries at C-5 and C-6 of the resulting homoallylic alcohol (8) were controlled by Roush
reagents based on mechanistic grounds, regardless of the β-chirality occurring in the aldehyde substrate (7).
8
1
1
0. Sharpless, K. B.; Akashi, K.; Oshima, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 29, 2503.
1. Oxidation of 6-methyl-1,3,5-octanetriol, prepared from 8(6S), in the presence of NMO and RuCl
the desired δ lactone 12(6S).
2
3 3
(PPh )
,10 did not lead to
20
1
12. Compound 12(6S): [α]
D
+38.2 (c 1.07, MeOH); H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
): 4.22 (1H, m, H-3), 4.11 (1H, ddd, J=12.1,
3
.0, 4.1 Hz, H-5), 2.90 (1H, ddd, J=17.0, 5.9, 1.2 Hz, H-2eq), 2.42 (1H, dd, J=17.0, 8.1 Hz, H-2ax), 2.15 (1H, m, H-4eq),
0
13
1
.50–1.72 (3H, m, H-6, H-4ax, H-7), 1.26 (1H, m, H-7 ), 0.95 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz), 0.92 (3H, t, J=7.4 Hz); C NMR (CDCl
3
):
1
70.87, 80.33, 64.15, 39.66, 38.78, 34.88, 24.85, 13.86, 11.52; HRMS (m/z): calcd for C : 172.1100, found: 172.1102.
9 16 3
H O
20
1
Compound 12(6R): [α]
D
+34.7 (c 1.32, MeOH); H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
): 4.25 (1H, m, H-3), 4.10 (1H, ddd, J=12.0,
5
.7, 2.9 Hz, H-5), 2.92 (1H, ddd, J=17.1, 5.9, 1.4 Hz, H-2eq), 2.45 (1H, dd, J=17.1, 8.2 Hz, H-2ax), 2.19 (1H, m, H-4eq), 1.78
0
13
(1H, m, H-7), 1.52–1.68 (2H, m, H-6, H-4ax), 1.26 (1H, m, H-7 ), 0.93 (6H, m); C NMR (CDCl
3
): 171.60, 80.95, 64.87,
3
9 16 3
9.62, 38.74, 33.90, 24.74, 14.01, 11.41; HRMS (m/z): calcd for C H O : 172.1100, found: 172.1120.
1
1
1
3. In the H NMR spectra of 12(6S) and 12(6R), the differences between the signals for the protons adjacent to the stereogenic
center C-6 are observable: (i) the signal for H-5 of 12(6S) shows ddd peak with J=3.0, 4.1, 12.1 Hz, while that for 12(6R)
shows ddd peak with J=2.9, 5.7, 12.0 Hz; (ii) the signal for one of the H-7 of 12(6S) appears at 1.57 ppm, while that for
1
2(6R) moves downfield to 1.78 ppm.
4. The stereochemistry at C-5 (S) of 12, generated by Roush crotylation, was consistent with that established by the
spectroscopic methods. This result confirmed the previous assumed stereochemistry produced by Roush crotylation.
8
,9